Richard P. Eibach

TL;DR: In this paper, a model of intersectional invisibility is developed and evidence from historical narratives, cultural representations, interest-group politics, and anti-discrimination legal frameworks is used to illustrate its utility.

TL;DR: It is concluded that on-line judgments of an action's self-concept compatibility affect the perspective used for image construction and the role of causal attributions in defining the self across time is considered.

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that the visual perspective people use to picture themselves engaging in a potential future action affects their self-perceptions and subsequent behavior, causing subjects who were instructed to picture voting from the third-person perspective to be significantly more likely to vote in the election.

TL;DR: Evidence is provided that hierarchies are indeed appealing because of their structure: Preference for hierarchy was higher among individuals high in Personal Need for Structure and a control threat increased preference for hierarchy even among participants low in Personal need for Structure.

TL;DR: Five studies manipulated the memory perspective of individuals used to visually recall autobiographical events and examined its effects on assessments of personal change, revealing a crucial moderator: Third-person recall produces judgments of greater self-change when people are inclined to look for evidence of change, but lesser self- change when they are inclinedto look for Evidence of continuity.