The International Mineralogical Association's approved amphibole nomenclature has been revised to simplify it, make it more consistent with divisions generally at 50%, define prefixes and modifiers more precisely, and include new amphibole species discovered and named since 1978, when the previous scheme was approved. The same reference axes form the basis of the new scheme and most names are little changed, but compound species names like tremolitic hornblende (now magnesiohornblende) are abolished, as are crossite (now glaucophane or ferroglaucophane or magnesioriebeckite or riebeckite), tirodite (now manganocummingtonite), and dannemorite (now manganogrunerite). The 50% rule has been broken only to retain tremolite and actinolite as in the 1978 scheme; the sodic-calcic amphibole range has therefore been expanded. Alkali amphiboles are now sodic amphiboles. The use of hyphens is defined. New amphibole names approved since 1978 include nyboite, leakeite, kornite, ungarettiite, sadanagaite, and cannilloite. All abandoned names are listed. The formulae and source of the amphibole end-member names are listed and procedures outlined to calculate Fe (super 3+) and Fe (super 2+) where not determined by analysis.

Nomenclature of amphiboles Report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names;Nomenclature of amphiboles Report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names

/pdf/nomenclature-of-amphiboles-report-of-the-subcommittee-on-2t3q4lqqz2.pdf

Nomenclature of amphiboles; report of the subcommittee on amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names

Amphibole thermodynamics are approximated with the symmetric formalism (regular solution model for within-site non-ideality and a reciprocal solution model for cross-site-terms) in order to formulate improved thermometers for amphibole-plagioclase assemblages. This approximation provides a convenient framework with which to account for composition-dependence of the ideal (mixing-on-sites) equilibrium constants for the equilibria:
 For A and B all possible within-site and cross-site interactions among the species □−K−Na−Ca−Mg−Fe2+−Fe3+−Al−Si on the A, M4, M1, M3, M2 and T1 amphibole crystallographic sites were examined. Of the 36 possible interaction energy terms, application of the symmetric formalism results in a dramatic simplification to eight independent parameters. Plagioclase nonideality is modelled using Darken's quadratic formalism. We have supplemented an experimental data set of 92 amphibole-plagioclase pairs with 215 natural pairs from igneous and metamorphic rocks in which the pressure and temperature of equilibration are well constrained. Regression of the combined dataset yields values for the eight interaction parameters as well as for apparent enthalpy, entropy and volume changes for each reaction. These parameters are used to formulate two new thermometers, which perform well (±40°C) in the range 400–1000°C and 1–15 kbar over a broad range of bulk compositions, including tschermakitic amphiboles from garnet amphibolites which caused problems for the simple thermometer of Blundy and Holland (1990). For silica-saturated rocks both thermometers may be applied: in silica-undersaturated rocks or magmas thermometer B alone can be applied. An improved procedure for estimation of ferric iron in calcic amphiboles is presented in the appendix.

Non-ideal interactions in calcic amphiboles and their bearing on amphibole-plagioclase thermometry

Several methods for absolute structure refinement were tested using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data collected using Cu Kα radiation for 23 crystals with no element heavier than oxygen: conventional refinement using an inversion twin model, estimation using intensity quotients in SHELXL2012, estimation using Bayesian methods in PLATON, estimation using restraints consisting of numerical intensity differences in CRYSTALS and estimation using differences and quotients in TOPAS-Academic where both quantities were coded in terms of other structural parameters and implemented as restraints. The conventional refinement approach yielded accurate values of the Flack parameter, but with standard uncertainties ranging from 0.15 to 0.77. The other methods also yielded accurate values of the Flack parameter, but with much higher precision. Absolute structure was established in all cases, even for a hydrocarbon. The procedures in which restraints are coded explicitly in terms of other structural parameters enable the Flack parameter to correlate with these other parameters, so that it is determined along with those parameters during refinement.

/pdf/use-of-intensity-quotients-and-differences-in-absolute-516yn7uin6.pdf

Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement

Publisher Summary The chapter presents a procedure that is applicable to single isomorphous replacement (SIR) data without anomalous scattering information as well as to pure single-wavelength anomalous scattering (SAS) data alone, and it does not require the presence of noncrystallographic symmetry. Test results shows that it is very effective; not only can it remove the phase ambiguity but it will also refine the phases at the same time. In actual application to SIR data, the method has even produced results that appear to be superior to those obtained from the multiple isomorphous replacement method. One of the situations in which the phase ambiguity problem occurs is when the isomorphous replacement method is applied to a noncentrosymmetric structure using only one isomorphous data set. The method demonstrates a remarkable effectiveness for overcoming the phase ambiguity problem that has the major obstacle in the use of SIR or SAS data alone for macromolecular studies. The computer programs used in the studies has been assembled into a program package.

Resolution of phase ambiguity in macromolecular crystallography.

A new classification and nomenclature scheme for the amphibole-supergroup minerals is described, based on the general formula AB 2 C 5 T 8 O 22 W 2 , where A = □, Na, K, Ca, Pb, Li; B = Na, Ca, Mn 2+ , Fe 2+ , Mg, Li; C = Mg, Fe 2+ , Mn 2+ , Al, Fe 3+ , Mn 3+ , Ti 4+ , Li; T = Si, Al, Ti 4+ , Be; W = (OH), F, Cl, O 2− . Distinct arrangements of formal charges at the sites (or groups of sites) in the amphibole structure warrant distinct root names , and are, by implication, distinct species; for a specific root name, different homovalent cations (e.g., Mg vs. Fe 2+ ) or anions (e.g., OH vs. F) are indicated by prefixes (e.g., ferro-, fluoro-). The classification is based on the A, B, and C groups of cations and the W group of anions, as these groups show the maximum compositional variability in the amphibole structure. The amphibole supergroup is divided into two groups according to the dominant W species: W (OH,F,Cl)-dominant amphiboles and W O-dominant amphiboles (oxo-amphiboles). Amphiboles with (OH, F, Cl) dominant at W are divided into eight subgroups according to the dominant charge-arrangements and type of B-group cations: magnesium-iron-manganese amphiboles, calcium amphiboles, sodium-calcium amphiboles, sodium amphiboles, lithium amphiboles, sodium-(magnesium-iron-manganese) amphiboles, lithium-(magnesium-iron-manganese) amphiboles and lithium-calcium amphiboles. Within each of these subgroups, the A- and C-group cations are used to assign specific names to specific compositional ranges and root compositions. Root names are assigned to distinct arrangements of formal charges at the sites, and prefixes are assigned to describe homovalent variation in the dominant ion of the root composition. For amphiboles with O dominant at W, distinct root-compositions are currently known for four (calcium and sodium) amphiboles, and homovalent variation in the dominant cation is handled as for the W (OH,F,Cl)-dominant amphiboles. With this classification, we attempt to recognize the concerns of each constituent community interested in amphiboles and incorporate these into this classification scheme. Where such concerns conflict, we have attempted to act in accord with the more important concerns of each community.

Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup

Knowledge of the partitioning behavior of trace elements between solid and liquid is a prerequisite for modern igneous and mantle petrology. Most of the mathematical models simulating melt generation, migration and evolution within the mantle and/or the crust require the availability of reliable solid/liquid partition coefficients for the mineral phases involved in the process.

Calcic amphiboles are extremely important for the understanding of lithospheric processes because of both their common occurrence in a variety of igneous and metamorphic rocks types and their capability of hosting a large number of geochemically important trace elements. A series of studies on the partitioning behavior of trace elements between calcic amphibole and silicate melt have therefore been carried out at different pressures, temperatures and system compositions during the last 15 years. However, due to the complex crystal chemistry of amphiboles, only few studies focused on the role of crystal structure and composition on amphibole-liquid partition coefficients (Amph/LD). In this chapter, present knowledge of the solid/ liquid trace element partitioning between calcic amphiboles and silicate melt is summarized and the role played by the crystal structure and melt composition on Amph/LD variations is highlighted in addition to the effects of pressure and temperature. The dataset used in this chapter includes only the results of experimental studies performed under well constrained P - T conditions for which trace element determinations were carried out with highly sensitive in situ microanalytical techniques.

The available dataset considered in this work are listed in Table 1⇓. Although far less common than the calcic amphiboles, potassic-richterites are potentially important in the generation of potassic magmatic rocks and in re-enrichment processes occurring in the subcontinental mantle lithosphere sampled as xenoliths in kimberlites. A comprehensive experimental study of trace element partitioning between synthetic potassic richterites and silicate melts has …

Trace-Element Partitioning Between Amphibole and Silicate Melt

[1] A new set of partitioning data for rare earth elements (REE: La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Dy, Er, and Yb), Y, Th, U, and Pb has been obtained for 25 calcic amphiboles (pargasites and kaersutites) crystallized from alkali-basaltic and basanitic bulk rock compositions at pressure P = 1.4 GPa, and temperature T between 950° and 1075°C. The variations of amphibole/liquid partition coefficients and of their ratios relevant to petrogenetic studies are discussed with reference to the major element composition of the amphiboles and of the coexisting melt, and to the crystal chemical mechanisms for trace element incorporation. Our results support the conclusions that REE and actinides are incorporated into the M4 cavity in calcic amphiboles and distributed between the two available sites within that cavity and that Pb is incorporated into the A site. In our sample population, REE patterns are systematically enriched in heavy REE (HREE), as expected from the presence of significant cummingtonite component. No significant fractionation is observed between Th and U. The major factor controlling the amount of trace element incorporation is the SiO2 content of the melt. The major implication of this study is that HREE can become compatible in amphibole in systems with SiO2 content greater than ∼50 wt %, whereas LREE always remain incompatible. We use the new DREEamph/l values to calculate the effects of amphibole crystallization during melt migration in the upper mantle by reactive porous flow as well as fractional crystallization of amphibole during melt migration in veined systems. We show that both processes will lead to residual liquids and solids with extremely variable LaN/YbN ratios.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2000GC000064

Partitioning of rare earth elements, Y, Th, U, and Pb between pargasite, kaersutite, and basanite to trachyte melts: Implications for percolated and veined mantle

Site populations in minerals; terminology and presentation of results of crystal-structure refinement

This chapter provides an introduction to the crystal structure, crystal chemistry and chemical composition of the amphiboles. It is not an exhaustive treatment; it is intended as an introduction to the material discussed in the following chapters. More extensive discussion of many points is given in Hawthorne (1981, 1983a), although all later developments are discussed in some detail here. Published crystal-structure refinements are listed in Appendix I.

The general chemical formula of the amphiboles can be written as

\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \[A\ B\_{2}\ C\_{5}\ T\_{8}\ O\_{22}\ W_{2}\] \end{document} 

where





Minor elements such as Zn, Ni2+, Co2+, V3+, Sc, Cr3+ and Zr are also observed as C cations. In a mineral group as chemically complicated as the amphiboles, there are many problems connected with (1) the measurement of chemical composition, and (2) calculation of the chemical formula.

### Chemical composition

The chemical composition of an amphibole is most commonly produced by electron microprobe analysis (EMPA). Instrumentation is very reliable and data reduction (including matrix corrections) are accurate. The main source of error is almost certainly errors in standards, a problem that can be dealt with in a simple but tedious fashion by cross-analyzing all standards. A more serious problem involves the components that cannot be analyzed (or analyzed accurately) by EMPA. Of particular relevance with regard to amphiboles are FeO vs. Fe2O3, Li2O and H2O, all of which occur commonly as highly variable constituents in amphiboles. We will focus on microbeam methods of …

Roberta Oberti

Papers

Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup

Trace-Element Partitioning Between Amphibole and Silicate Melt

Partitioning of rare earth elements, Y, Th, U, and Pb between pargasite, kaersutite, and basanite to trachyte melts: Implications for percolated and veined mantle

Site populations in minerals; terminology and presentation of results of crystal-structure refinement

Amphiboles: Crystal Chemistry