In this paper, we address the subspace clustering problem. Given a set of data samples (vectors) approximately drawn from a union of multiple subspaces, our goal is to cluster the samples into their respective subspaces and remove possible outliers as well. To this end, we propose a novel objective function named Low-Rank Representation (LRR), which seeks the lowest rank representation among all the candidates that can represent the data samples as linear combinations of the bases in a given dictionary. It is shown that the convex program associated with LRR solves the subspace clustering problem in the following sense: When the data is clean, we prove that LRR exactly recovers the true subspace structures; when the data are contaminated by outliers, we prove that under certain conditions LRR can exactly recover the row space of the original data and detect the outlier as well; for data corrupted by arbitrary sparse errors, LRR can also approximately recover the row space with theoretical guarantees. Since the subspace membership is provably determined by the row space, these further imply that LRR can perform robust subspace clustering and error correction in an efficient and effective way.

Robust Recovery of Subspace Structures by Low-Rank Representation

Many real-world problems deal with collections of high-dimensional data, such as images, videos, text, and web documents, DNA microarray data, and more. Often, such high-dimensional data lie close to low-dimensional structures corresponding to several classes or categories to which the data belong. In this paper, we propose and study an algorithm, called sparse subspace clustering, to cluster data points that lie in a union of low-dimensional subspaces. The key idea is that, among the infinitely many possible representations of a data point in terms of other points, a sparse representation corresponds to selecting a few points from the same subspace. This motivates solving a sparse optimization program whose solution is used in a spectral clustering framework to infer the clustering of the data into subspaces. Since solving the sparse optimization program is in general NP-hard, we consider a convex relaxation and show that, under appropriate conditions on the arrangement of the subspaces and the distribution of the data, the proposed minimization program succeeds in recovering the desired sparse representations. The proposed algorithm is efficient and can handle data points near the intersections of subspaces. Another key advantage of the proposed algorithm with respect to the state of the art is that it can deal directly with data nuisances, such as noise, sparse outlying entries, and missing entries, by incorporating the model of the data into the sparse optimization program. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm through experiments on synthetic data as well as the two real-world problems of motion segmentation and face clustering.

/pdf/sparse-subspace-clustering-algorithm-theory-and-applications-3fjsiby0gs.pdf

Sparse Subspace Clustering: Algorithm, Theory, and Applications

Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) consists in the concurrent construction of a model of the environment (the map ), and the estimation of the state of the robot moving within it. The SLAM community has made astonishing progress over the last 30 years, enabling large-scale real-world applications and witnessing a steady transition of this technology to industry. We survey the current state of SLAM and consider future directions. We start by presenting what is now the de-facto standard formulation for SLAM. We then review related work, covering a broad set of topics including robustness and scalability in long-term mapping, metric and semantic representations for mapping, theoretical performance guarantees, active SLAM and exploration, and other new frontiers. This paper simultaneously serves as a position paper and tutorial to those who are users of SLAM. By looking at the published research with a critical eye, we delineate open challenges and new research issues, that still deserve careful scientific investigation. The paper also contains the authors’ take on two questions that often animate discussions during robotics conferences: Do robots need SLAM? and Is SLAM solved?

/pdf/past-present-and-future-of-simultaneous-localization-and-27i1pn9khc.pdf

Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age

Techniques from sparse signal representation are beginning to see significant impact in computer vision, often on nontraditional applications where the goal is not just to obtain a compact high-fidelity representation of the observed signal, but also to extract semantic information. The choice of dictionary plays a key role in bridging this gap: unconventional dictionaries consisting of, or learned from, the training samples themselves provide the key to obtaining state-of-the-art results and to attaching semantic meaning to sparse signal representations. Understanding the good performance of such unconventional dictionaries in turn demands new algorithmic and analytical techniques. This review paper highlights a few representative examples of how the interaction between sparse signal representation and computer vision can enrich both fields, and raises a number of open questions for further study.

/pdf/sparse-representation-for-computer-vision-and-pattern-3c3yhkwhwq.pdf

Sparse Representation for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM)consists in the concurrent construction of a model of the environment (the map), and the estimation of the state of the robot moving within it. The SLAM community has made astonishing progress over the last 30 years, enabling large-scale real-world applications, and witnessing a steady transition of this technology to industry. We survey the current state of SLAM. We start by presenting what is now the de-facto standard formulation for SLAM. We then review related work, covering a broad set of topics including robustness and scalability in long-term mapping, metric and semantic representations for mapping, theoretical performance guarantees, active SLAM and exploration, and other new frontiers. This paper simultaneously serves as a position paper and tutorial to those who are users of SLAM. By looking at the published research with a critical eye, we delineate open challenges and new research issues, that still deserve careful scientific investigation. The paper also contains the authors' take on two questions that often animate discussions during robotics conferences: Do robots need SLAM? and Is SLAM solved?

/pdf/past-present-and-future-of-simultaneous-localization-and-dhljw0akg5.pdf

Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Age

Over the past few years, several methods for segmenting a scene containing multiple rigidly moving objects have been proposed. However, most existing methods have been tested on a handful of sequences only, and each method has been often tested on a different set of sequences. Therefore, the comparison of different methods has been fairly limited. In this paper, we compare four 3D motion segmentation algorithms for affine cameras on a benchmark of 155 motion sequences of checkerboard, traffic, and articulated scenes.

/pdf/a-benchmark-for-the-comparison-of-3-d-motion-segmentation-4ogr2fq5ko.pdf

A Benchmark for the Comparison of 3-D Motion Segmentation Algorithms

In this paper, we study the problem of segmenting tracked feature point trajectories of multiple moving objects in an image sequence. Using the affine camera model, this problem can be cast as the problem of segmenting samples drawn from multiple linear subspaces. In practice, due to limitations of the tracker, occlusions, and the presence of nonrigid objects in the scene, the obtained motion trajectories may contain grossly mistracked features, missing entries, or corrupted entries. In this paper, we develop a robust subspace separation scheme that deals with these practical issues in a unified mathematical framework. Our methods draw strong connections between lossy compression, rank minimization, and sparse representation. We test our methods extensively on the Hopkins155 motion segmentation database and other motion sequences with outliers and missing data. We compare the performance of our methods to state-of-the-art motion segmentation methods based on expectation-maximization and spectral clustering. For data without outliers or missing information, the results of our methods are on par with the state-of-the-art results and, in many cases, exceed them. In addition, our methods give surprisingly good performance in the presence of the three types of pathological trajectories mentioned above. All code and results are publicly available at http://perception.csl.uiuc.edu/coding/motion/.

Motion Segmentation in the Presence of Outlying, Incomplete, or Corrupted Trajectories

We examine the problem of segmenting tracked feature point trajectories of multiple moving objects in an image sequence. Using the affine camera model, this motion segmentation problem can be cast as the problem of segmenting samples drawn from a union of linear subspaces. Due to limitations of the tracker, occlusions and the presence of nonrigid objects in the scene, the obtained motion trajectories may contain grossly mistracked features, missing entries, or not correspond to any valid motion model. In this paper, we develop a robust subspace separation scheme that can deal with all of these practical issues in a unified framework. Our methods draw strong connections between lossy compression, rank minimization, and sparse representation. We test our methods extensively and compare their performance to several extant methods with experiments on the Hopkins 155 database. Our results are on par with state-of-the-art results, and in many cases exceed them. All MATLAB code and segmentation results are publicly available for peer evaluation at http://perception.csl.uiuc.edu/coding/motion/.

/pdf/motion-segmentation-via-robust-subspace-separation-in-the-23grm0rgsm.pdf

Motion segmentation via robust subspace separation in the presence of outlying, incomplete, or corrupted trajectories

We consider the problem of segmenting multiple rigid-body motions from point correspondences in multiple affine views. We cast this problem as a subspace clustering problem in which point trajectories associated with each motion live in a linear subspace of dimension two, three or four. Our algorithm involves projecting all point trajectories onto a 5-dimensional subspace using the SVD, the PowerFactorization method, or RANSAC, and fitting multiple linear subspaces representing different rigid-body motions to the points in ?5 using GPCA. Unlike previous work, our approach does not restrict the motion subspaces to be four-dimensional and independent. Instead, it deals gracefully with all the spectrum of possible affine motions: from two-dimensional and partially dependent to four-dimensional and fully independent. Our algorithm can handle the case of missing data, meaning that point tracks do not have to be visible in all images, by using the PowerFactorization method to project the data. In addition, our method can handle outlying trajectories by using RANSAC to perform the projection. We compare our approach to other methods on a database of 167 motion sequences with full motions, independent motions, degenerate motions, partially dependent motions, missing data, outliers, etc. On motion sequences with complete data our method achieves a misclassification error of less that 5% for two motions and 29% for three motions.

/pdf/multiframe-motion-segmentation-with-missing-data-using-1w87j4myuw.pdf

Multiframe Motion Segmentation with Missing Data Using PowerFactorization and GPCA

Pose graph optimization is the non-convex optimization problem underlying pose-based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM). If robot orientations were known, pose graph optimization would be a linear least-squares problem, whose solution can be computed efficiently and reliably. Since rotations are the actual reason why SLAM is a difficult problem, in this work we survey techniques for 3D rotation estimation. Rotation estimation has a rich history in three scientific communities: robotics, computer vision, and control theory. We review relevant contributions across these communities, assess their practical use in the SLAM domain, and benchmark their performance on representative SLAM problems (Fig. 1). We show that the use of rotation estimation to bootstrap iterative pose graph solvers entails significant boost in convergence speed and robustness.

/pdf/initialization-techniques-for-3d-slam-a-survey-on-rotation-3m98pinbbw.pdf

Roberto Tron

Papers

A Benchmark for the Comparison of 3-D Motion Segmentation Algorithms

Motion Segmentation in the Presence of Outlying, Incomplete, or Corrupted Trajectories

Motion segmentation via robust subspace separation in the presence of outlying, incomplete, or corrupted trajectories

Multiframe Motion Segmentation with Missing Data Using PowerFactorization and GPCA

Initialization techniques for 3D SLAM: A survey on rotation estimation and its use in pose graph optimization