scispace - formally typeset
R

Roman Kislov

Researcher at University of Manchester

Publications -  58
Citations -  1124

Roman Kislov is an academic researcher from University of Manchester. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 44 publications receiving 808 citations. Previous affiliations of Roman Kislov include Manchester Metropolitan University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science

TL;DR: A shift of perspective from ‘theories’ as products to “theorising” as a process can enable empirical researchers to capitalise on the two-way relationships between empirical data and different levels of theory and contribute to the advancement of knowledge.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rethinking capacity building for knowledge mobilisation: developing multilevel capabilities in healthcare organisations

TL;DR: This conceptual paper uses empirical and theoretical literature on organisational learning and dynamic capabilities to enhance the understanding of intentional capacity building for knowledge mobilisation in healthcare organisations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: lessons from the theory of communities of practice

TL;DR: The CoP approach can complement traditional 'stage-of-change' theories used in the field of implementation research and provide a basis for designing theory-informed interventions and evaluations and suggest ways of crossing multiple boundaries to enable knowledge transfer and organisational learning.
Journal ArticleDOI

The NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Greater Manchester: Combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy.

TL;DR: This paper outlines the GM CLAHRC approach to designing and evaluating a large-scale, evidence- and theory-informed, context-sensitive implementation programme and presents an argument for adopting an integrative, co-production approach to planning and evaluating the implementation of research into practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

The ‘dark side’ of knowledge brokering

TL;DR: The ‘dark side’ of knowledge brokering is explored, reflecting on its inherent challenges, which are categorized as tensions between different aspects ofBrokering; (1) tensions betweenDifferent aspects of brokered; (2) tension between different types and sources of knowledge; and (3) tensions resulting from the ‘in-between’ position of brokers.