The EPR effect for macromolecular drug delivery to solid tumors: Improvement of tumor uptake, lowering of systemic toxicity, and distinct tumor imaging in vivo

Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks.

This article reviews developments in the technology for ethanol production from lignocellulosic materials by “enzymatic” processes. Several methods of pretreatment of lignocelluloses are discussed, where the crystalline structure of lignocelluloses is opened up, making them more accessible to the cellulase enzymes. The characteristics of these enzymes and important factors in enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulose and hemicellulose to cellobiose, glucose, and other sugars are discussed. Different strategies are then described for enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation, including separate enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), non-isothermal simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (NSSF), simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF), and consolidated bioprocessing (CBP). Furthermore, the by-products in ethanol from lignocellulosic materials, wastewater treatment, commercial status, and energy production and integration are reviewed.

/pdf/acid-based-hydrolysis-processes-for-ethanol-from-5bj47066uh.pdf

Acid-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: a review.

Among different conversion processes for biomass, biological anaerobic digestion is one of the most economic ways to produce biogas from various biomass substrates In addition to hydrolysis of polymeric substances, the activity and performance of the methanogenic bacteria is of paramount importance during methanogenesis The aim of this paper is primarily to review the recent literature about the occurrence of both acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of particulate biomass to methane (not wastewater treatment), while this review does not cover the activity of the acetate oxidizing bacteria Both acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens are essential for the last step of methanogenesis, but the reports about their roles during this phase of the process are very limited Despite, some conclusions can still be drawn At low concentrations of acetate, normally filamentous Methanosaeta species dominate, eg, often observed in sewage sludge Apparently, high concentrations of toxic ionic agents, like ammonia, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and volatile fatty acids (VFA), inhibit preferably Methanosaetaceae and especially allow the growth of Methanosarcina species consisting of irregular cell clumps, eg, in cattle manure Thermophilic conditions can favour rod like or coccoid hydrogenotrophic methanogens Thermophilic Methanosarcina species were also observed, but not thermophilic Methanosaetae Other environmental factors could favour hydrogentrophic bacteria, eg, short or low retention times in a biomass reactor However, no general rules regarding process parameters could be derivated at the moment, which favours hydrogenotrophic methanogens Presumably, it depends only on the hydrogen concentration, which is generally not mentioned in the literature

The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review

Microbial alkaline proteases: From a bioindustrial viewpoint

The effects of micro-aeration on the phylogenetic diversity of microorganisms in a thermophilic anaerobic municipal solid-waste digester.

Influence of Ni2+ and Co2+ on methanogenic activity and the amounts of coenzymes involved in methanogenesis

Repeated gene manipulations can be performed in yeast by excision of an introduced marker. Cassette modules containing a marker flanked by two direct repeat sequences of hisG or loxP have often been used for marker recycling, but these leave one copy of the repeats in the chromosome after excision. Genomic copies of a repeat can cause increased mistargeting of constructs containing the same repeats or unexpected chromosomal rearrangements via intra- or interchromosomal recombinations. Here, we describe a novel marker recycling procedure that leaves no scar in the genome, which we have designated seamless gene deletion. A 40 base sequence derived from an adjacent region to the targeted locus was placed in an integrating construct to generate direct repeats after integration. Seamless HIS3 deletion was achieved via a PCR fragment that consisted of a URA3 marker attached to a 40 base repeat-generating sequence flanked by HIS3 targeting sequences at both ends. Transformation of the designed construct resulted in his3 disruption and the generation of 40 base direct repeats on both sides of URA3 in the targeted locus. The resulting his3::URA3 disruptants were plated on 5-fluoroorotic acid medium to select for URA3 loss. All the selected colonies had lost URA3 precisely by recombination between the repeats, resulting in his3 deletion without any extraneous sequences left behind in the chromosome.

Shigeru Morimura

Papers

The effects of micro-aeration on the phylogenetic diversity of microorganisms in a thermophilic anaerobic municipal solid-waste digester.

Influence of Ni2+ and Co2+ on methanogenic activity and the amounts of coenzymes involved in methanogenesis

PCR-mediated seamless gene deletion and marker recycling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Synthesis of chitosan-caffeic acid derivatives and evaluation of their antioxidant activities.

Microbial community analysis of mesophilic anaerobic protein degradation process using bovine serum albumin (BSA)-fed continuous cultivation