S
Stefan Linquist
Researcher at University of Guelph
Publications - 46
Citations - 752
Stefan Linquist is an academic researcher from University of Guelph. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Ecology (disciplines). The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 43 publications receiving 594 citations. Previous affiliations of Stefan Linquist include University of Pittsburgh & University of Sydney.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Past, Present, and Future Approaches Using Computer Vision for Animal Re-Identification from Camera Trap Data
TL;DR: It is expected that this methodology will allow ecologists with camera/video trap data to re-identify individuals that exit and re-enter the camera frame and could stand to revolutionize the analysis of camera trap data and, ultimately, the approach to animal ecology.
Journal ArticleDOI
Distinguishing between “Function” and “Effect” in Genome Biology
TL;DR: It is decided that although all genomic structures have effects, only some of them should be said to have functions, and that genomicists in particular should pay greater attention to parsing biological effects.
Journal ArticleDOI
The vernacular concept of innateness
Paul E. Griffiths,Paul E. Griffiths,Edouard Machery,Edouard Machery,Stefan Linquist,Stefan Linquist +5 more
TL;DR: This paper examined the response of biologically naive participants to a series of realistic scenarios concerning the development of birdsong and found that these analyses are subject to compelling counterexamples, undermining the appeal of these analyses.
Journal ArticleDOI
Philosophical issues in ecology: Recent trends and future directions
Mark Colyvan,Stefan Linquist,William Grey,Paul E. Griffiths,Jay Odenbaugh,Hugh P. Possingham +5 more
TL;DR: The aim of this work is to prompt further exchange between ecology and philosophy of science and to help set the agenda for future work in the philosophy of ecology.
Journal ArticleDOI
Exploring the folkbiological conception of human nature
TL;DR: This paper examines biologically naive subjects' judgments about whether traits of an animal are ‘innate’, ‘in its DNA’ or ‘part of its nature’ and reports further studies that extend and refine the account of this aspect of folkbiology.