scispace - formally typeset
S

Stephen Weng

Researcher at University of Nottingham

Publications -  49
Citations -  2468

Stephen Weng is an academic researcher from University of Nottingham. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Overweight. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 49 publications receiving 1753 citations. Previous affiliations of Stephen Weng include National Institute for Health Research.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors assessed whether machine-learning can improve cardiovascular risk prediction and found that machine learning offers an opportunity to improve accuracy by exploiting complex interactions between risk factors, which can increase the number of patients who could benefit from preventive treatment, while avoiding unnecessary treatment of others.
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic review and meta-analyses of risk factors for childhood overweight identifiable during infancy

TL;DR: Several risk factors for both overweight and obesity in childhood are identifiable during infancy and future research needs to focus on whether it is clinically feasible for healthcare professionals to identify infants at greatest risk.
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions that aim to reduce the risk, either directly or indirectly, of overweight and obesity in infancy and early childhood

TL;DR: Interventions that aim to improve diet and parental responsiveness to infant cues showed most promise in terms of self‐reported behavioural change despite the known risk factors, there were very few intervention studies for pregnant women that continue during infancy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimating overweight risk in childhood from predictors during infancy.

TL;DR: Using a prediction algorithm to identify at-risk infants could reduce levels of child overweight and obesity by enabling health professionals to target prevention more effectively and evaluate the clinical validity, feasibility, and acceptability of communicating this risk.