Tanya Rose

TL;DR: The results of this study indicate that important treatment outcomes for people living with aphasia most frequently link to the activity/participation and body function components of the ICF.

TL;DR: Formatting characteristics considered to be barriers and facilitators to reading printed education materials (PEMs) support many of the recommendations found within the literature for developing best practice PEMs and accessible information for other patient groups.

TL;DR: A preliminary investigation has found that aphasia‐friendly material does assist people with aphasIA to comprehend health information and a greater understanding of people withaphasia's reactions to aphasic‐friendly materials and also the social impact of providing aphasian‐friendly information is required.

TL;DR: An overview of the ROMA process is provided and the WAB-R, GHQ-12, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies.

TL;DR: Survey results revealed that the provision of intensive speech-language pathology intervention for people with aphasia is most common in the inpatient rehabilitation setting, and the widespread use of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures (AusTOMs) was an indication that the ICF framework informs outcome measurement in aphasic patients.