scispace - formally typeset
T

Thomas A. DiPrete

Researcher at Columbia University

Publications -  108
Citations -  11538

Thomas A. DiPrete is an academic researcher from Columbia University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Educational attainment & Standard of living. The author has an hindex of 47, co-authored 107 publications receiving 10406 citations. Previous affiliations of Thomas A. DiPrete include University of Wisconsin-Madison & University of Chicago.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments

TL;DR: Cumulative advantage is a general mechanism for inequality across any temporal process (e.g., life course, family generations) in which a favorable relative position becomes a resource that produces further relative gains as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Growing Female Advantage in College Completion: The Role of Family Background and Academic Achievement:

TL;DR: In a few short decades, the gender gap in college completion has reversed from favoring men to favoring women as mentioned in this paper, which is the first to assess broadly the causes of the growing female empowerment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gender inequalities in education.

TL;DR: The authors reviewed the empirical research and theoretical perspectives on gender inequalities in educational performance and attainment from early childhood to young adulthood and recommended three directions for future research: (a) interdisciplinary efforts to understand gender differences in cognitive development and noncognitive abilities in early childhood, (b) research on the structure and practices of schooling, and (c) analyses of how gender differences might amplify other kinds of inequalities, such as racial, ethnic, class, or nativity inequalities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments

TL;DR: The Rosenbaum bounds approach as mentioned in this paper allows the analyst to determine how strongly an unmeasured confounding variable must affect selection into treatment in order to undermine the conclusions about causal effects from a matching analysis.