T
Thomas K. Flesch
Researcher at University of Alberta
Publications - 93
Citations - 4063
Thomas K. Flesch is an academic researcher from University of Alberta. The author has contributed to research in topics: Feedlot & Greenhouse gas. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 89 publications receiving 3637 citations. Previous affiliations of Thomas K. Flesch include Purdue University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Backward-Time Lagrangian Stochastic Dispersion Models and Their Application to Estimate Gaseous Emissions
TL;DR: In this article, a backward Lagrangian stochastic model is proposed to calculate an ensemble of fluid element (particle) trajectories that are distinguished by each passing through an observation point.
Journal ArticleDOI
Deducing Ground-to-Air Emissions from Observed Trace Gas Concentrations: A Field Trial
TL;DR: In this article, the gas emission rate from an artificial 36m2 surface area source was inferred from line-average concentration (CL) measured by an open-path laser situated up to 100 m downwind.
Journal ArticleDOI
Estimating gas emissions from a farm with an inverse-dispersion technique
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used an inverse-dispersion technique to diagnose gas emissions from a swine farm using a backward Lagrangian stochastic (bLS) model, which takes as input the average wind velocity and direction, surface roughness, and atmospheric stability.
Journal ArticleDOI
Determining ammonia emissions from a cattle feedlot with an inverse dispersion technique
TL;DR: In this article, an inverse-dispersion technique is used to calculate ammonia (NH3) gas emissions from a cattle feedlot, which relies on a simple backward Lagrangian stochastic dispersion model to relate atmospheric NH3 concentration to the emission rate.
Journal ArticleDOI
Fugitive methane emissions from an agricultural biodigester
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors measured fugitive methane emissions from a Canadian biodigester and found that during normal operations, the average fugitive emission rate corresponded to 3.1% of the CH 4 gas production rate.