scispace - formally typeset
T

Tomas Philipson

Researcher at University of Chicago

Publications -  59
Citations -  2708

Tomas Philipson is an academic researcher from University of Chicago. The author has contributed to research in topics: Incentive & Economic surplus. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 59 publications receiving 2596 citations. Previous affiliations of Tomas Philipson include University of Illinois at Chicago & National Bureau of Economic Research.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

The Quantity and Quality of Life and the Evolution of World Inequality

TL;DR: It is shown that mortality from infectious, respiratory, and digestive diseases, congenital, perinatal, and “ill-defined” conditions, mostly concentrated before age 20 and between ages 20 and 50, is responsible for most of the reduction in life expectancy inequality.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Quantity and Quality of Life and the Evolution of World Inequality

TL;DR: In this article, the authors derived valuation formulas for infra-marginal changes in longevity and computed a "full" growth rate that incorporates the gains in health experienced by 96 countries for the period between 1960 and 2000.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Empirical Examination of Information Barriers to Trade in Insurance

TL;DR: The authors used direct evidence to evaluate whether asymmetric information is a barrier to trade in the largest market for private insurance in the world: life insurance, and found that sellers may know their costs of production better than consumers in this market, as in those for most other products.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Rise in Old-Age Longevity and the Market for Long-Term Care

TL;DR: The evidence provides support for the predictions concerning the response in output growth to aging and the contraction of output due to the aging of males, and argues that the direct effect of aging is to lower the demand for market care by incresing the supply of home production.
ReportDOI

Nonprofit Production and Competition

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that previous analysis of nonprofits has not separated profit-deviating preferences from the state-defined regulatory status of nonprofit production, and they argue that this separation is crucial in providing predictions about the underlying forces which allow the coexistence of nonprofit and for-profit production in an industry, as well as predictions about such fundamental matters as the share of nonprofit activity.