Travis B. Paveglio

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide guiding principles to bridge diverse fire science efforts to advance an integrated agenda of wildfire research that can help overcome disciplinary silos and provide insight on how to build fire-resilient communities.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors characterize the primary social and ecological dimensions of wildfire risk pathology, paying particular attention to the governance system around wildfire risk, and suggest strategies to mitigate the pathology through innovative planning approaches, analytical tools, and policies.

TL;DR: In this paper, a comparison of local social context and community characteristics across cases can identify community archetypes that approach wildfire planning and mitigation in consistently different ways, including local communication networks, reasons for place attachment or community identity, distrust of government, and actions undertaken to address issues of forest health and esthetics.

TL;DR: The knowledge and preliminary case study evidence needed to begin systematically documenting the differing levels and types of adaptive capacity WUI communities have for addressing collective problems such as wildland fire hazard are laid out.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the possibilities for addressing this gap through an analysis of wildfire resilience among wildland-urban interface communities in the western region of the United States, and reengage important but overlooked components of social-ecological system resilience by situating rural communities within their stateto national-level institutional contexts.