W
Wieland Müller
Researcher at University of Vienna
Publications - 140
Citations - 3158
Wieland Müller is an academic researcher from University of Vienna. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cournot competition & Duopoly. The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 138 publications receiving 3013 citations. Previous affiliations of Wieland Müller include Humboldt State University & Tilburg University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Plaque Ulceration and Lumen Thrombus Are the Main Sources of Cerebral Microemboli in High-grade Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
Matthias Sitzer,Wieland Müller,Mario Siebler,Waldemar Hort,H. W. Kniemeyer,Lutz Jäncke,H. Steinmetz +6 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conducted a prospective investigation of 40 consecutive asymptomatic or recently symptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for 70% to 95% internal Carotid artery stenosis.
Journal ArticleDOI
Who is (more) rational
TL;DR: This article found a high level of consistency in the individual-level decisions and considerable heterogeneity in subjects' consistency scores in a large-scale field experiment with over 2,000 Dutch households.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Relevance of Equal Splits in Ultimatum Games
TL;DR: A slightly altered version of the mini ultimatum game of G. E. Bolton and R. Zwick is presented, finding a significant change in behavior: Fair offers occur less often when equal splits are replaced by nearly equal splits.
Journal ArticleDOI
Stackelberg Beats Cournot — On Collusion and Efficiency in Experimental Markets
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare Stackelberg and Cournot duopoly markets with quantity competition, and find that both of them yield higher outputs than Cournot markets and, thus, higher efficiency.
Journal ArticleDOI
Workaholics and Dropouts in Organizations
Wieland Müller,Andrew Schotter +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors report the results of experiments designed to test the theory of the optimal composition of prizes in contests and find that the behavior of subjects is consistent with that predicted by the theory, but such aggregate results mask an unexpected compositional effect on the individual level.