scispace - formally typeset
X

Xiangke Chen

Researcher at Ohio State University

Publications -  11
Citations -  908

Xiangke Chen is an academic researcher from Ohio State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Aqueous solution & Ion. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 11 publications receiving 825 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Interfacial water structure associated with phospholipid membranes studied by phase-sensitive vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopy.

TL;DR: Phase-sensitive vibrational sum frequency generation is employed to investigate the water structure at phospholipid/water interfaces and zwitterionic DPPC and DPPE reveal weaker water orienting capability relative to net negative DPPA, DPPG, and DPPS.
Journal ArticleDOI

Shedding light on water structure at air-aqueous interfaces: ions, lipids, and hydration.

TL;DR: An account is given of the current state of understanding of aqueous salt, acid, and lipid/water surfaces, interfacial depth, and molecular organization within the air-solution interfacial region, and vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopic studies of aQueous surfaces are interpreted.
Journal ArticleDOI

Na(+) and Ca(2+) effect on the hydration and orientation of the phosphate group of DPPC at air-water and air-hydrated silica interfaces

TL;DR: Findings show that extrapolation of results obtained from model membranes from liquid surfaces to solid supports may not be warranted since there are differences in headgroup organization on the two subphases.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reorganization and caging of DPPC, DPPE, DPPG, and DPPS monolayers caused by dimethylsulfoxide observed using Brewster angle microscopy.

TL;DR: The D MSO-induced condensing and caging effect is the molecular mechanism that may account for the enhanced permeability of membranes upon exposure to DMSO.
Journal ArticleDOI

Direct comparison of phase-sensitive vibrational sum frequency generation with maximum entropy method: case study of water.

TL;DR: It is shown that both methods lead to the same complex spectrum and the strengths and weaknesses of each of these methods are discussed, analyzing possible sources of experimental and analytical errors.