An improved method for the preparation of graphene oxide (GO) is described. Currently, Hummers’ method (KMnO4, NaNO3, H2SO4) is the most common method used for preparing graphene oxide. We have found that excluding the NaNO3, increasing the amount of KMnO4, and performing the reaction in a 9:1 mixture of H2SO4/H3PO4 improves the efficiency of the oxidation process. This improved method provides a greater amount of hydrophilic oxidized graphene material as compared to Hummers’ method or Hummers’ method with additional KMnO4. Moreover, even though the GO produced by our method is more oxidized than that prepared by Hummers’ method, when both are reduced in the same chamber with hydrazine, chemically converted graphene (CCG) produced from this new method is equivalent in its electrical conductivity. In contrast to Hummers’ method, the new method does not generate toxic gas and the temperature is easily controlled. This improved synthesis of GO may be important for large-scale production of GO as well as the ...

https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id=54ca19b4cf57d79a768b4618&assetKey=AS%3A273691751976961%401442264606356

Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide

The reduction of graphene oxide

Approaches, Derivatives and Applications Vasilios Georgakilas,† Michal Otyepka,‡ Athanasios B. Bourlinos,‡ Vimlesh Chandra, Namdong Kim, K. Christian Kemp, Pavel Hobza,‡,§,⊥ Radek Zboril,*,‡ and Kwang S. Kim* †Institute of Materials Science, NCSR “Demokritos”, Ag. Paraskevi Attikis, 15310 Athens, Greece ‡Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic Center for Superfunctional Materials, Department of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology, San 31, Hyojadong, Namgu, Pohang 790-784, Korea Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Flemingovo naḿ. 2, 166 10 Prague 6, Czech Republic

Functionalization of Graphene: Covalent and Non-Covalent Approaches, Derivatives and Applications

Over the past few decades, researchers have established artificial enzymes as highly stable and low-cost alternatives to natural enzymes in a wide range of applications. A variety of materials including cyclodextrins, metal complexes, porphyrins, polymers, dendrimers and biomolecules have been extensively explored to mimic the structures and functions of naturally occurring enzymes. Recently, some nanomaterials have been found to exhibit unexpected enzyme-like activities, and great advances have been made in this area due to the tremendous progress in nano-research and the unique characteristics of nanomaterials. To highlight the progress in the field of nanomaterial-based artificial enzymes (nanozymes), this review discusses various nanomaterials that have been explored to mimic different kinds of enzymes. We cover their kinetics, mechanisms and applications in numerous fields, from biosensing and immunoassays, to stem cell growth and pollutant removal. We also summarize several approaches to tune the activities of nanozymes. Finally, we make comparisons between nanozymes and other catalytic materials (other artificial enzymes, natural enzymes, organic catalysts and nanomaterial-based catalysts) and address the current challenges and future directions (302 references).

Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): next-generation artificial enzymes

Metal Oxides and Oxysalts as Anode Materials for Li Ion Batteries

Evaluation of the structure-activity relationship of carbon nanomaterials as antioxidants.

The catalytic behaviors, kinetics, and mechanisms are the basic criteria to determine if a nanomaterial with intrinsic activity is a nanozyme. Michaelis–Menten model is usually used to analyze the kinetics parameters including affinity constant, reaction velocity, and catalytic efficiency for natural enzymes. Nanozymes follow similar kinetics and mechanisms as natural enzymes. However, the active sites and detailed physiochemical processes responsible for the catalysis in nanomaterials may be different, regarding the features including composition, crystal structure, defects, electron transfer, substrate adsorption, and product dissociation. There may be common nature for the catalysis of nanozymes and natural enzymes.

Kinetics and Mechanisms for Nanozymes

DFT calculations consistently suggest that a lanthanide will sit on either the 6/6 bond inside C60 having a divalent state or the hexagonal center having a trivalent state. Some lanthanides can stay only above the 6/6 bond inside C60 to form stabilized structures, despite the greatly reduced metal–cage coordination numbers. The preference for C–C bonds by a divalent metal has been confirmed by revisiting the structures of Yb@C2v(3)-C80, Yb@Cs(6)-C82 and Yb@C2v(9)-C82, for which the calculations suggest that the Yb atoms are indeed situated above the C–C bonds, close to the reported structures obtained by single crystal XRD experiments. The result will guide the characterization of structures and electronic structures of endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs), especially C60 mono-EMFs, in the future.

Xingfa Gao

Papers

Evaluation of the structure-activity relationship of carbon nanomaterials as antioxidants.

Kinetics and Mechanisms for Nanozymes

Divalent metals can reside on bonds in fullerenes

Isolated aromatic patches as a rule to select metallofullerene multiple adducts with high chemical stabilities

Preparation and spectra of13C-enriched fullerene