Example of AoB PLANTS format
Recent searches

Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format Example of AoB PLANTS format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

AoB PLANTS — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Plant Science #80 of 445 down down by 25 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 284 Published Papers | 1259 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 21/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.2
SJR: 1.713
SNIP: 2.207
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 0.617
SNIP: 0.924
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.3
SJR: 0.633
SNIP: 1.433
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Frontiers Media

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.2
SJR: 1.752
SNIP: 1.821

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.182

4% from 2018

Impact factor for AoB PLANTS from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.182
2018 2.27
2017 2.821
2016 2.238
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.4

16% from 2019

CiteRatio for AoB PLANTS from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.4
2019 3.8
2018 5.3
2017 4.8
2016 4.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 4% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 16% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.998

8% from 2019

SJR for AoB PLANTS from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.998
2019 0.926
2018 1.103
2017 1.28
2016 1.273
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.106

9% from 2019

SNIP for AoB PLANTS from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.106
2019 1.012
2018 1.338
2017 1.361
2016 1.115
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
AoB PLANTS

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Oxford University Press

AoB PLANTS

AoB PLANTS is an open-access, online journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of environmental and evolutionary plant biology. Published by Oxford University Press, this non-profit journal provides a fast-track pathway for publishing high-quality research i...... Read More

Plant science

Plant Science

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
21 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
2041-2851
i
Acceptance Rate
Not provided
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tun-neling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge im-balance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515–4532, 1982.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/AOBPLA/PLS052
Nitric oxide in plants: an assessment of the current state of knowledge
01 Jan 2013 - Aob Plants

Abstract:

Background and aims After a series of seminal works during the last decade of the 20th century, nitric oxide (NO) is now firmly placed in the pantheon of plant signals. Nitric oxide acts in plant–microbe interactions, responses to abiotic stress, stomatal regulation and a range of developmental processes. By considering the ... Background and aims After a series of seminal works during the last decade of the 20th century, nitric oxide (NO) is now firmly placed in the pantheon of plant signals. Nitric oxide acts in plant–microbe interactions, responses to abiotic stress, stomatal regulation and a range of developmental processes. By considering the recent advances in plant NO biology, this review will highlight certain key aspects that require further attention. read more read less
View PDF
433 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/AOBPLA/PLS014
Hydrogen peroxide—a central hub for information flow in plant cells
Veselin Petrov1, Frank Van Breusegem1
01 Jan 2012 - Aob Plants

Abstract:

BACKGROUND Hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) was initially recognized as a toxic reactive oxygen species, able to cause damage to a variety of cellular structures. However, it became clear in the last decade that H(2)O(2) can also act as a potent signalling molecule, involved in a plethora of physiological functions. SCOPE In the ... BACKGROUND Hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) was initially recognized as a toxic reactive oxygen species, able to cause damage to a variety of cellular structures. However, it became clear in the last decade that H(2)O(2) can also act as a potent signalling molecule, involved in a plethora of physiological functions. SCOPE In the present review, we offer a brief summary of H(2)O(2) signalling events and focus on the mechanisms of its perception and signal transduction, the factors that act downstream, as well as H(2)O(2) interference with other information transfer mechanisms. CONCLUSION The significant scientific effort in the last 10 years to determine the position of H(2)O(2) in signal transduction networks in plants demonstrated that it is essential for both the communication with external biotic and abiotic stimuli and the control of developmentally regulated processes. In addition, H(2)O(2) complements, synergizes or antagonizes many cellular regulatory circuits by active interaction with other signals and plant hormones during growth, development and stress responses. Therefore, further understanding of H(2)O(2) signal transduction is not only of fundamental, but also of practical importance, since this knowledge may contribute to improve agricultural practices and reduce stress-induced damage to crops. read more read less
View PDF
335 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/AOBPLA/PLU001
Phragmites australis management in the United States: 40 years of methods and outcomes
01 Jan 2014 - Aob Plants

Abstract:

Studies on invasive plant management are often short in duration and limited in the methods tested, and lack an adequate description of plant communities that replace the invader following removal. Here we present a com- prehensive review of management studies on a single species, in an effort to elucidate future directions f... Studies on invasive plant management are often short in duration and limited in the methods tested, and lack an adequate description of plant communities that replace the invader following removal. Here we present a com- prehensive review of management studies on a single species, in an effort to elucidate future directions for research in invasive plant management. We reviewed the literature on Phragmites management in North America in an effort to synthesize our understanding of management efforts, identify gaps in knowledge and improve the efficacy of man- agement. Additionally, we assessed recent ecological findings concerning Phragmites mechanisms of invasion and integrated these findings into our recommendations for more effective management. Our overall goal is to examine whether or not current management approaches can be improved and whether they promote reestablishment of native plant communities. We found: (i) little information on community-level recovery of vegetation following removal of Phragmites; and (ii) most management approaches focus on the removal of Phragmites from individual stands or groups of stands over a relatively small area. With a few exceptions, recovery studies did not monitor vege- tation for substantial durations, thus limiting adequate evaluation of the recovery trajectory. We also found that none of the recovery studies were conducted in a landscape context, even though it is now well documented that land-use patterns on adjacent habitats influence the structure and function of wetlands, including the expansion of Phragmites. We suggest that Phragmites management needs to shift to watershed-scale efforts in coastal regions, or larger man- agement units inland. In addition, management efforts should focus on restoring native plant communities, rather than simply eradicating Phragmites stands. Wetlands and watersheds should be prioritized to identify ecosystems that would benefit most from Phragmites management and those where the negative impact of management would be minimal. read more read less

Topics:

Phragmites (59%)59% related to the paper
View PDF
213 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/AOBPLA/PLU027
Prosopis: a global assessment of the biogeography, benefits, impacts and management of one of the world's worst woody invasive plant taxa.
Ross T. Shackleton1, David C. Le Maitre1, Nick M. Pasiecznik, David M. Richardson1
01 Jan 2014 - Aob Plants

Abstract:

Invasive species cause ecological, economic and social impacts and are key drivers of global change. This is the case for the genus Prosopis (mesquite; Fabaceae) where several taxa are among the world's most damaging invasive species. Many contentious issues ('conflicts of interest') surround these taxa, and management interv... Invasive species cause ecological, economic and social impacts and are key drivers of global change. This is the case for the genus Prosopis (mesquite; Fabaceae) where several taxa are among the world's most damaging invasive species. Many contentious issues ('conflicts of interest') surround these taxa, and management interventions have not yet sustainably reduced the negative impacts. There is an urgent need to better understand the factors that drive invasions and shape management actions, and to compare the effectiveness of different management approaches. This paper presents a global review of Prosopis, focusing on its distribution, impacts, benefits and approaches to management. Prosopis was found to occur in a 129 countries globally and many more countries are climatically suitable. All areas with naturalized or invasive Prosopis species at present are suitable for more taxa and many Asian and Mediterranean countries with no records of Prosopis are bioclimatically suitable. Several Prosopis species have substantial impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and local and regional economies in their native and even more so in their invasive ranges; others provide multiple benefits to local communities. Management efforts are underway in only a small part of the invaded range. Countries where more research has been done are more likely to implement formal management than those where little published research is available. Management strategies differ among countries; developed nations use mainly mechanical and chemical control whereas developing nations tend to apply control through utilization approaches. A range of countries are also using biological control. Key gaps in knowledge and promising options for management are highlighted. read more read less

Topics:

Ecosystem services (51%)51% related to the paper, Introduced species (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
180 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/AOBPLA/PLU078
Introduced and invasive cactus species: a global review
Ana Novoa1, Johannes J. Le Roux1, Mark P. Robertson2, John R. U. Wilson1, David M. Richardson1
01 Jan 2015 - Aob Plants

Abstract:

Understanding which species are introduced and become invasive, and why, are central questions in invasion science. Comparative studies on model taxa have provided important insights, but much more needs to be done to unravel the context dependencies of these findings. The cactus family (Cactaceae), one of the most popular ho... Understanding which species are introduced and become invasive, and why, are central questions in invasion science. Comparative studies on model taxa have provided important insights, but much more needs to be done to unravel the context dependencies of these findings. The cactus family (Cactaceae), one of the most popular horticultural plant groups, is an interesting case study. Hundreds of cactus species have been introduced outside their native ranges; a few of them are among the most damaging invasive plant species in the world. We reviewed the drivers of introductions and invasions in the family and seek insights that can be used to minimize future risks. We compiled a list of species in the family and determined which have been recorded as invasive. We also mapped current global distributions and modelled the potential global distributions based on distribution data of known invasive taxa. Finally, we identified whether invasiveness is phylogenetically clustered for cacti and whether particular traits are correlated with invasiveness. Only 57 of the 1922 cactus species recognized in this treatment have been recorded as invasive. There are three invasion hotspots: South Africa (35 invasive species recorded), Australia (26 species) and Spain (24 species). However, there are large areas of the world with climates suitable for cacti that are at risk of future invasion-in particular, parts of China, eastern Asia and central Africa. The invasive taxa represent an interesting subset of the total species pool. There is a significant phylogenetic signal: invasive species occur in 2 of the 3 major phylogenetic clades and in 13 of the 130 genera. This phylogenetic signal is not driven by human preference, i.e. horticultural trade, but all invasive species are from 5 of the 12 cactus growth forms. Finally, invasive species tend to have significantly larger native ranges than non-invasive species, and none of the invasive species are of conservation concern in their native range. These results suggest fairly robust correlates of invasiveness that can be used for proactive management and risk assessments. read more read less

Topics:

Introduced species (63%)63% related to the paper, Invasive species (54%)54% related to the paper, Range (biology) (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
170 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for AoB PLANTS.

It automatically formats your research paper to Oxford University Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

AoB PLANTS format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write AoB PLANTS in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the AoB PLANTS guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the AoB PLANTS guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the AoB PLANTS guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in AoB PLANTS?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the AoB PLANTS citation style.

4. Can I use the AoB PLANTS templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for AoB PLANTS.

5. Can I use a manuscript in AoB PLANTS that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper AoB PLANTS that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in AoB PLANTS?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in AoB PLANTS.

7. Where can I find the template for the AoB PLANTS?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per AoB PLANTS's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the AoB PLANTS's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. AoB PLANTS an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's AoB PLANTS is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like AoB PLANTS?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like AoB PLANTS?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using AoB PLANTS?

After writing your paper autoformatting in AoB PLANTS, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is AoB PLANTS's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for AoB PLANTS?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for AoB PLANTS. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In AoB PLANTS?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for AoB PLANTS are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the AoB PLANTS?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per AoB PLANTS's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download AoB PLANTS in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in AoB PLANTS Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to AoB PLANTS formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template