Example of Philosophical Explorations format
Recent searches

Example of Philosophical Explorations format Example of Philosophical Explorations format Example of Philosophical Explorations format Example of Philosophical Explorations format Example of Philosophical Explorations format Example of Philosophical Explorations format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Philosophical Explorations format Example of Philosophical Explorations format Example of Philosophical Explorations format Example of Philosophical Explorations format Example of Philosophical Explorations format Example of Philosophical Explorations format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Philosophical Explorations — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Philosophy #80 of 644 up up by 31 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 98 Published Papers | 152 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 05/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.302
SNIP: 0.743
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.8
SJR: 0.699
SNIP: 1.341
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.4
SJR: 0.388
SNIP: 1.091
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.2
SJR: 0.288
SNIP: 0.637

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.6

33% from 2019

CiteRatio for Philosophical Explorations from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.6
2019 1.2
2018 1.0
2017 1.1
2016 1.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.68

6% from 2019

SJR for Philosophical Explorations from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.68
2019 0.639
2018 0.309
2017 1.168
2016 0.629
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.254

23% from 2019

SNIP for Philosophical Explorations from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.254
2019 1.017
2018 0.531
2017 0.788
2016 0.889
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 33% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 23% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Philosophical Explorations

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Philosophical Explorations

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Philosophical Explorations formatting guidelines as mentioned in Taylor and Francis author instructions. The current version was created on 05 Jul 2020 and has been used by 613 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Philosophy

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
05 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1386-9795
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.117
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13869790500492466
The emotional basis of moral judgments
Jesse J. Prinz1

Abstract:

Recent work in cognitive science provides overwhelming evidence for a link between emotion and moral judgment. I review findings from psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and research on psychopathology and conclude that emotions are not merely correlated with moral judgments but they are also, in some sense, both necessary an... Recent work in cognitive science provides overwhelming evidence for a link between emotion and moral judgment. I review findings from psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and research on psychopathology and conclude that emotions are not merely correlated with moral judgments but they are also, in some sense, both necessary and sufficient. I then use these findings along with some anthropological observations to support several philosophical theories: first, I argue that sentimentalism is true: to judge that something is wrong is to have a sentiment of disapprobation towards it. Second, I argue that moral facts are response-dependent: the bad just is that which cases disapprobation in a community of moralizers. Third, I argue that a form of motivational internalism is true: ordinary moral judgments are intrinsically motivating, and all non-motivating moral judgments are parasitic on these. read more read less

Topics:

Moral psychology (68%)68% related to the paper, Moral disengagement (66%)66% related to the paper, Social cognitive theory of morality (63%)63% related to the paper, Moral reasoning (63%)63% related to the paper, Internalism and externalism (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
306 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/138697903600815756
Conceivability and possibility

Abstract:

We often decide whether a state of affairs is possible (impossible) by trying to mentally depict a scenario (using words, images, etc.) where the state in question obtains (or fails to obtain). These mental acts (broadly thought of as ‘conceiving’) seem to provide us with an epistemic route to the space of possibilities. The ... We often decide whether a state of affairs is possible (impossible) by trying to mentally depict a scenario (using words, images, etc.) where the state in question obtains (or fails to obtain). These mental acts (broadly thought of as ‘conceiving’) seem to provide us with an epistemic route to the space of possibilities. The problem this raises is whether conceivability judgments provide justification-conferring grounds for the ensuing possibility-claims (call this the ‘conceivability thesis’). Although the question has a long history, contemporary interest in it was, to a large extent, prompted by Kripke's utilization of modal intuitions in the course of propounding certain influential theses in the philosophy of language and mind. The interest has been given a further boost by the recent two-dimensional approach to the Kripkean framework. In this paper, I begin by providing a detailed examination of a most recent attempt (due to Chalmers) to defend the thesis and argue that it is unsuccessful. This is f... read more read less

Topics:

Two-dimensionalism (55%)55% related to the paper, State of affairs (53%)53% related to the paper
278 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13869790701305871
The rise and fall of experimental philosophy
Antti Kauppinen1

Abstract:

In disputes about conceptual analysis, each side typically appeals to pre-theoretical ‘intuitions’ about particular cases. Recently, many naturalistically oriented philosophers have suggested that these appeals should be understood as empirical hypotheses about what people would say when presented with descriptions of situati... In disputes about conceptual analysis, each side typically appeals to pre-theoretical ‘intuitions’ about particular cases. Recently, many naturalistically oriented philosophers have suggested that these appeals should be understood as empirical hypotheses about what people would say when presented with descriptions of situations, and have consequently conducted surveys on non-specialists. I argue that this philosophical research programme, a key branch of what is known as ‘experimental philosophy’, rests on mistaken assumptions about the relation between people's concepts and their linguistic behaviour. The conceptual claims that philosophers make imply predictions about the folk's responses only under certain demanding, counterfactual conditions. Because of the nature of these conditions, the claims cannot be tested with methods of positivist social science. We are, however, entitled to appeal to intuitions about folk concepts in virtue of possessing implicit normative knowledge acquired through reflecti... read more read less

Topics:

Experimental philosophy (62%)62% related to the paper, Counterfactual thinking (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
222 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/10002003098538748
The Logic of Team Reasoning

Abstract:

Orthodox decision theory presupposes that agency is invested in individuals. An opposing literature allows team agency to be invested in teams whose members use distinctive modes of team reasoning. This paper offers a new conceptual framework, inspired by David Lewis's analysis of common reasons for belief, within which team ... Orthodox decision theory presupposes that agency is invested in individuals. An opposing literature allows team agency to be invested in teams whose members use distinctive modes of team reasoning. This paper offers a new conceptual framework, inspired by David Lewis's analysis of common reasons for belief, within which team reasoning can be represented. It shows how individuals can independently endorse a principle of team reasoning which prescribes acting as a team member conditional on assurance that others have endorsed the same principle. It argues that there can be such assurance even when no individual has an obligation to act on team reasoning. *This paper originated in a lecture that I gave at a Colloquium on Collective Intentions at Erasmus University Rotterdam. I thank participants, and particularly Govert den Hartogh, for comments. The analysis presented in this paper is an offshoot of a larger project, which uses David Lewis's work as the starting point for a reconstruction of the fo... read more read less

Topics:

Agency (sociology) (52%)52% related to the paper
211 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13869790008523332
The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgement
Luc Boltanski1, Laurent Thévenot1

Abstract:

The paper offers a modelling of the sense of justice as it is displayed in ordinary situated disputes. While this model accounts for a plurality of legitimate forms of evaluation which are used in the process of critique and justification, it escapes a relativism of values by demonstrating that all these forms satisfy a set o... The paper offers a modelling of the sense of justice as it is displayed in ordinary situated disputes. While this model accounts for a plurality of legitimate forms of evaluation which are used in the process of critique and justification, it escapes a relativism of values by demonstrating that all these forms satisfy a set of common requirements. The reasonable character of the everyday sense of justice is also anchored in a reality test involving the engagement of objects which qualify for a certain form of evaluation. The paper discusses this model in relation to competing theories of justice, and models of social action and interaction. read more read less

Topics:

Situated (55%)55% related to the paper, Judgement (55%)55% related to the paper, Relativism (52%)52% related to the paper, Economic Justice (52%)52% related to the paper, Action (philosophy) (51%)51% related to the paper
210 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Philosophical Explorations.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Philosophical Explorations format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Philosophical Explorations in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Philosophical Explorations guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Philosophical Explorations guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Philosophical Explorations guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Philosophical Explorations?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Philosophical Explorations citation style.

4. Can I use the Philosophical Explorations templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Philosophical Explorations.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Philosophical Explorations that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Philosophical Explorations that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Philosophical Explorations?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Philosophical Explorations.

7. Where can I find the template for the Philosophical Explorations?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Philosophical Explorations's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Philosophical Explorations's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Philosophical Explorations an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Philosophical Explorations is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Philosophical Explorations?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Philosophical Explorations?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Philosophical Explorations?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Philosophical Explorations, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Philosophical Explorations's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Philosophical Explorations?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Philosophical Explorations. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Philosophical Explorations?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Philosophical Explorations are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Philosophical Explorations?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Philosophical Explorations's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Philosophical Explorations in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Philosophical Explorations Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Philosophical Explorations formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template