Institution
Alabama State University
Education•Montgomery, Alabama, United States•
About: Alabama State University is a education organization based out in Montgomery, Alabama, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Immune system. The organization has 453 authors who have published 862 publications receiving 17260 citations.
Topics: Population, Immune system, Dissociation (chemistry), Gene, Cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: This review is an amalgamation of recent advances in the field of functionalization of gold nanoparticles and their potential applications in the fields of medicine and biology.
Abstract: Metal nanoparticles are being extensively used in various biomedical applications due to their small size to volume ratio and extensive thermal stability. Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are an obvious choice due to their amenability of synthesis and functionalization, less toxicity and ease of detection. The present review focuses on various methods of functionalization of GNPs and their applications in biomedical research. Functionalization facilitates targeted delivery of these nanoparticles to various cell types, bioimaging, gene delivery, drug delivery and other therapeutic and diagnostic applications. This review is an amalgamation of recent advances in the field of functionalization of gold nanoparticles and their potential applications in the field of medicine and biology.
670 citations
••
TL;DR: The present review focuses on providing an overview of advances in the field of tissue engineered skin substitute development, the availability of various types, and their application.
Abstract: Tissue engineered skin substitutes for wound healing have evolved tremendously over the last couple of years. New advances have been made toward developing skin substitutes made up of artificial and natural materials. Engineered skin substitutes are developed from acellular materials or can be synthesized from autologous, allograft, xenogenic, or synthetic sources. Each of these engineered skin substitutes has their advantages and disadvantages. However, to this date, a complete functional skin substitute is not available, and research is continuing to develop a competent full thickness skin substitute product that can vascularize rapidly. There is also a need to redesign the currently available substitutes to make them user friendly, commercially affordable, and viable with longer shelf life. The present review focuses on providing an overview of advances in the field of tissue engineered skin substitute development, the availability of various types, and their application.
423 citations
••
TL;DR: Future research endeavors in biofuels production should be placed on the search of novel biofuel production species, optimization and improvement of culture conditions, genetic engineering of biofuel-producing species, and effective techniques for mass cultivation of microorganisms.
421 citations
••
TL;DR: The functionalization of CNTs improves their solubility and biocompatibility and alters their cellular interaction pathways, resulting in much-reduced cytotoxic effects.
Abstract: Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are emerging as novel nanomaterials for various biomedical applications. CNTs can be used to deliver a variety of therapeutic agents, including biomolecules, to the target disease sites. In addition, their unparalleled optical and electrical properties make them excellent candidates for bioimaging and other biomedical applications. However, the high cytotoxicity of CNTs limits their use in humans and many biological systems. The biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity of CNTs are attributed to size, dose, duration, testing systems, and surface functionalization. The functionalization of CNTs improves their solubility and biocompatibility and alters their cellular interaction pathways, resulting in much-reduced cytotoxic effects. Functionalized CNTs are promising novel materials for a variety of biomedical applications. These potential applications are particularly enhanced by their ability to penetrate biological membranes with relatively low cytotoxicity. This review is directed towards the overview of CNTs and their functionalization for biomedical applications with minimal cytotoxicity.
406 citations
••
TL;DR: Various types of scaffolding approaches and biomaterials used in the field of skin tissue engineering are discussed and more importantly their future prospects in skin tissue regeneration efforts are discussed.
Abstract: Over centuries, the field of regenerative skin tissue engineering has had several advancements to facilitate faster wound healing and thereby restoration of skin. Skin tissue regeneration is mainly based on the use of suitable scaffold matrices. There are several scaffold types, such as porous, fibrous, microsphere, hydrogel, composite and acellular, etc., with discrete advantages and disadvantages. These scaffolds are either made up of highly biocompatible natural biomaterials, such as collagen, chitosan, etc., or synthetic materials, such as polycaprolactone (PCL), and poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG), etc. Composite scaffolds, which are a combination of natural or synthetic biomaterials, are highly biocompatible with improved tensile strength for effective skin tissue regeneration. Appropriate knowledge of the properties, advantages and disadvantages of various biomaterials and scaffolds will accelerate the production of suitable scaffolds for skin tissue regeneration applications. At the same time, emphasis on some of the leading challenges in the field of skin tissue engineering, such as cell interaction with scaffolds, faster cellular proliferation/differentiation, and vascularization of engineered tissues, is inevitable. In this review, we discuss various types of scaffolding approaches and biomaterials used in the field of skin tissue engineering and more importantly their future prospects in skin tissue regeneration efforts.
384 citations
Authors
Showing all 462 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Muhammad Saleem | 60 | 1017 | 18396 |
Yi Hong | 40 | 134 | 5173 |
Susan L. Davies | 38 | 106 | 6400 |
Upender Manne | 38 | 156 | 4172 |
Jagjit S. Yadav | 37 | 116 | 5859 |
M. Kim Oh | 34 | 53 | 3991 |
Derrick Dean | 33 | 70 | 4531 |
Vida A. Dennis | 32 | 92 | 3633 |
Shree R. Singh | 30 | 104 | 3572 |
Omar A. Oyarzabal | 28 | 74 | 2250 |
Peter A. Noble | 27 | 63 | 2250 |
Sanjay Kumar | 26 | 128 | 2815 |
Shreekumar R. Pillai | 22 | 42 | 2257 |
Ki Hang Kim | 21 | 94 | 1484 |
Atul A. Chaudhari | 20 | 45 | 1489 |