Institution
St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences
Education•Sankt Pölten, Austria•
About: St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences is a education organization based out in Sankt Pölten, Austria. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Computer science & Coercivity. The organization has 223 authors who have published 394 publications receiving 4087 citations. The organization is also known as: St. Pölten UAS.
Topics: Computer science, Coercivity, The Internet, Micromagnetics, Gait (human)
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, the grain boundary diffusion process using an Nd70Cu30 eutectic alloy has been applied to hot-deformed anisotropic Nd-Fe-B magnets, resulting in a substantial enhancement of coercivity, at the expense of remanence.
246 citations
••
TL;DR: A combination of high resolution characterization, molecular dynamics and micromagnetic simulations and model thick film systems has been used to gain valuable new insights into the coercivity mechanisms in R-Fe-B magnets as discussed by the authors.
201 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the microstructure of hot-deformed permanent magnets with different Nd contents was investigated in order to correlate them with the hard magnetic properties and found a clear correlation between the Nd concentration in the grain boundary (GB) layer and the coercivity.
194 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors demonstrate that the local demagnetization factor decreases as the grain size is reduced, which explains the higher coercivity and lower temperature dependence of magnetization in magnetization reversals with smaller grain sizes.
160 citations
••
TL;DR: The main goal of this survey is to analyze the effectiveness of different classes of software obfuscation against the continuously improving deobfuscation techniques and off-the-shelf code analysis tools.
Abstract: Software obfuscation has always been a controversially discussed research area. While theoretical results indicate that provably secure obfuscation in general is impossible, its widespread application in malware and commercial software shows that it is nevertheless popular in practice. Still, it remains largely unexplored to what extent today’s software obfuscations keep up with state-of-the-art code analysis and where we stand in the arms race between software developers and code analysts. The main goal of this survey is to analyze the effectiveness of different classes of software obfuscation against the continuously improving deobfuscation techniques and off-the-shelf code analysis tools. The answer very much depends on the goals of the analyst and the available resources. On the one hand, many forms of lightweight static analysis have difficulties with even basic obfuscation schemes, which explains the unbroken popularity of obfuscation among malware writers. On the other hand, more expensive analysis techniques, in particular when used interactively by a human analyst, can easily defeat many obfuscations. As a result, software obfuscation for the purpose of intellectual property protection remains highly challenging.
133 citations
Authors
Showing all 240 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Thomas Schrefl | 50 | 403 | 10867 |
Josef Fidler | 43 | 290 | 7921 |
Edgar Weippl | 37 | 309 | 5174 |
Dieter Suess | 36 | 327 | 5945 |
Wolfgang Aigner | 30 | 121 | 3646 |
Markus Wagner | 29 | 199 | 2686 |
Simon Bance | 20 | 53 | 896 |
Matthias Zeppelzauer | 19 | 99 | 1202 |
Peter Kieseberg | 19 | 87 | 1341 |
Alexander Rind | 18 | 49 | 957 |
Markus Huber | 17 | 38 | 1479 |
Sebastian Schrittwieser | 16 | 79 | 1305 |
Simon Tjoa | 16 | 49 | 782 |
Lukas Exl | 14 | 48 | 723 |
Johann Fischbacher | 14 | 52 | 608 |