Institution
Toledo Hospital
Healthcare•Toledo, Ohio, United States•
About: Toledo Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in Toledo, Ohio, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Medicine & Venous thrombosis. The organization has 540 authors who have published 474 publications receiving 8546 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The results of immunohistochemical staining and electromicroscopy support the hypothesis that the tumor originates from pleuripotential embryonic stem cells, and pancreatic embryonic tumors seems preferable to papillary cystic and solid tumor of the pancreas to delineate the origin of the tumor and to reflect some of its biologic characteristics.
306 citations
••
TL;DR: The results of this survey indicate that there is considerable room for improvement in the beliefs, attitudes, and practices of family physicians regarding obese patients.
261 citations
••
TL;DR: Severe discordance is more frequent and has greater morbidity in monochorionic than dichorionic twins and the most frequent findings in the placentas of severely discordant twins were small placental weight and umbilical cord abnormalities.
224 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report the longer-term efficacy of supervised exercise compared with stent revascularization (ST) for aortoiliac peripheral artery disease (PAD).
188 citations
••
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center1, Henry Ford Health System2, Hartford Hospital3, Toledo Hospital4, Analogic Corporation5, Medical University of South Carolina6, State University of New York Upstate Medical University7, Henry Ford Hospital8, Duke University9, University of Texas at Austin10
TL;DR: A standard indicator which reflects the radiation exposure that is incident on a detector after every exposure event and that reflects the noise levels present in the image data is recommended to facilitate the production of consistent, high quality digital radiographic images at acceptable patient doses.
Abstract: Digital radiographic imaging systems, such as those using photostimulable storage phosphor, amorphous selenium, amorphous silicon, CCD, and MOSFET technology, can produce adequate image quality over a much broader range of exposure levels than that of screen/film imaging systems. In screen/film imaging, the final image brightness and contrast are indicative of over- and underexposure. In digital imaging, brightness and contrast are often determined entirely by digital postprocessing of the acquired image data. Overexposure and underexposures are not readily recognizable. As a result, patient dose has a tendency to gradually increase over time after a department converts from screen/film-based imaging to digital radiographic imaging. The purpose of this report is to recommend a standard indicator which reflects the radiation exposure that is incident on a detector after every exposure event and that reflects the noise levels present in the image data. The intent is to facilitate the production of consistent, high quality digital radiographic images at acceptable patient doses. This should be based not on image optical density or brightness but on feedback regarding the detector exposure provided and actively monitored by the imaging system. A standard beam calibration condition is recommended that is based on RQA5 but uses filtration materials that are commonly available and simple to use. Recommendations on clinical implementation of the indices to control image quality and patient dose are derived from historical tolerance limits and presented as guidelines.
142 citations
Authors
Showing all 543 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
James C. Stanley | 76 | 395 | 26187 |
Louis M. Messina | 58 | 210 | 11610 |
Manuela Mollejo | 52 | 162 | 7602 |
Anthony J. Comerota | 49 | 191 | 16874 |
Andre Konski | 47 | 239 | 10309 |
Isaac J. Powell | 39 | 106 | 5167 |
Robert E. McCullumsmith | 35 | 129 | 3986 |
John M. Howard | 33 | 228 | 4125 |
Theodore H. Welling | 31 | 74 | 7172 |
Fedor Lurie | 29 | 139 | 3836 |
Robert Topp | 29 | 128 | 3298 |
Angel F. Remacha | 27 | 100 | 1966 |
Milo Engoren | 26 | 127 | 2276 |
Mohammed M. Moursi | 24 | 63 | 1741 |
Sharon M. Desmond | 24 | 46 | 1709 |