Institution
University of Canterbury
Education•Christchurch, New Zealand•
About: University of Canterbury is a education organization based out in Christchurch, New Zealand. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Large Hadron Collider. The organization has 11100 authors who have published 29846 publications receiving 893232 citations. The organization is also known as: Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha & Canterbury College.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
•
31 Jul 2014
288 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, a serie de coordinats bidentes et tridentes, heterocycliques azotes are discussed, together with a discussion of the relation between them.
288 citations
••
287 citations
••
Christopher J L Murray1, Charlton S K H Callender1, Xie Rachel Kulikoff1, Vinay Srinivasan1 +1092 more•Institutions (424)
TL;DR: This work estimated population in 195 locations by single year of age and single calendar year from 1950 to 2017 with standardised and replicable methods and used the cohort-component method of population projection, with inputs of fertility, mortality, population, and migration data.
287 citations
••
TL;DR: A thorough independent benchmark comparing state-of-the-art metagenome analysis tools is presented, showing that the most widely used tools are not necessarily the most accurate, that themost accurate tool is not always the most time consuming, and that there is a high degree of variability between available tools.
Abstract: Metagenome studies are becoming increasingly widespread, yielding important insights into microbial communities covering diverse environments from terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to human skin and gut. With the advent of high-throughput sequencing platforms, the use of large scale shotgun sequencing approaches is now commonplace. However, a thorough independent benchmark comparing state-of-the-art metagenome analysis tools is lacking. Here, we present a benchmark where the most widely used tools are tested on complex, realistic data sets. Our results clearly show that the most widely used tools are not necessarily the most accurate, that the most accurate tool is not necessarily the most time consuming, and that there is a high degree of variability between available tools. These findings are important as the conclusions of any metagenomics study are affected by errors in the predicted community composition and functional capacity. Data sets and results are freely available from http://www.ucbioinformatics.org/metabenchmark.html.
287 citations
Authors
Showing all 11248 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Carlo Rovelli | 146 | 1502 | 103550 |
Kenneth A. Dodge | 138 | 468 | 79640 |
John D. Potter | 137 | 795 | 75310 |
David A. Jackson | 136 | 1095 | 68352 |
Wajid Ali Khan | 128 | 1272 | 79308 |
David Krofcheck | 128 | 1043 | 77143 |
Hafeez R Hoorani | 128 | 1208 | 80646 |
Muhammad Ahmad | 128 | 1187 | 79758 |
David M. Fergusson | 127 | 474 | 55992 |
Philip H Butler | 125 | 970 | 71999 |
Paul Lujan | 123 | 1255 | 76799 |
W. Dominik | 122 | 669 | 64410 |
A. J. Bell | 119 | 498 | 55643 |
Cynthia M. Bulik | 107 | 714 | 41562 |
David A. Boas | 106 | 631 | 38003 |