Showing papers in "arXiv: Logic in 2016"

Unified Correspondence as a Proof-Theoretic Tool

Abstract: The present paper aims at establishing formal connections between correspondence phenomena, well known from the area of modal logic, and the theory of display calculi, originated by Belnap. These connections have been seminally observed and exploited by Marcus Kracht, in the context of his characterization of the modal axioms (which he calls primitive formulas) which can be effectively transformed into `analytic' structural rules of display calculi. In this context, a rule is `analytic' if adding it to a display calculus preserves Belnap's cut-elimination theorem. In recent years, the state-of-the-art in correspondence theory has been uniformly extended from classical modal logic to diverse families of nonclassical logics, ranging from (bi-)intuitionistic (modal) logics, linear, relevant and other substructural logics, to hybrid logics and mu-calculi. This generalization has given rise to a theory called unified correspondence, the most important technical tools of which are the algorithm ALBA, and the syntactic characterization of Sahlqvist-type classes of formulas and inequalities which is uniform in the setting of normal DLE-logics (logics the algebraic semantics of which is based on bounded distributive lattices). We apply unified correspondence theory, with its tools and insights, to extend Kracht's results and prove his claims in the setting of DLE-logics. The results of the present paper characterize the space of properly displayable DLE-logics.

Martin's conjecture, arithmetic equivalence, and countable Borel equivalence relations

Abstract: Introduction. There is a fascinating interplay and overlap between recursion theory and descriptive set theory. A particularly beautiful source of such interaction has been Martin's conjecture on Turing invariant functions. This longstanding open problem in recursion theory has connected to many problems in descriptive set theory, particularly in the theory of countable Borel equivalence relations. In this paper, we shall give an overview of some work that has been done on Martin's conjecture, and applications that it has had in descriptive set theory. We will present a long unpublished result of Slaman and Steel that arithmetic equivalence is a universal countable Borel equivalence relation. This theorem has interesting corollaries for the theory of universal countable Borel equivalence relations in general. We end with some open problems, and directions for future research. Martin's conjecture. Martin's conjecture on Turing invariant functions is one of the oldest and deepest open problems on the global structure of the Turing degrees. Inspired by Sacks’ question on the existence of a degree-invariant solution to Post's problem [Sac66], Martin made a sweeping conjecture that says in essence, the only nontrivial definable Turing invariant functions are the Turing jump and its iterates through the transfinite. Our basic references for descriptive set theory and effective descriptive set theory are the books of Kechris [Kec95] and Sacks [Sac90]. Let ≤T be Turing reducibility on the Cantor space ^ω2, and let ≡T be Turing equivalence. Given x ∈^ω2, let x′ be the Turing jump of x. The Turing degree of a real x∈^ω2 is the ≡T equivalence class of x. A Turing invariant function is a function such that for all reals x, y ∈ ^ω2, if x ≡T y, then f(x) ≡T f(y). The Turing invariant functions are those which induce functions on the Turing degrees. With the axiom of choice, we can construct many pathological Turing invariant functions. Martin's conjecture is set in the context of ZF+DC+AD, where AD is the axiom of determinacy. We assume ZF+DC+AD for the rest of this section. The results we will discuss all “localize” so that the assumption of AD essentially amounts to studying definable functions assuming definable determinacy, for instance, Borel functions using Borel determinacy.

Multi-type Sequent Calculi

Abstract: Display calculi are generalized sequent calculi which enjoy a `canonical' cut elimination strategy. That is, their cut elimination is uniformly obtained by verifying the assumptions of a meta-theorem, and is preserved by adding or removing structural rules. In the present paper, we discuss a proof-theoretic setting, inspired both to Belnap's Display Logic and to Sambin's Basic Logic, which generalises these calculi in two directions: by explicitly allowing different types, and by weakening the so-called display and visibility properties. The generalisation to a multi-type environment makes it possible to introduce specific tools enhancing expressivity, which have proved useful e.g. for a smooth proof-theoretic treatment of multi-modal and dynamic logics. The generalisation to a setting in which full display property is not required makes it possible to account for logics which admit connectives which are neither adjoints nor residuals, or logics that are not closed under uniform substitution. In the present paper, we give a general overview of the calculi which we refer to as multi-type calculi, and we discuss their canonical cut elimination meta-theorem.

The Model Theory of Nuclear $\mathrm{C}^*$-algebras

Abstract: We begin the model theoretic study of nuclear $\mathrm{C}^*$-algebras using the tools of continuous logic.

Destruction or Preservation As You Like It

Abstract: The Gap Forcing Theorem, a key contribution of this paper, implies essentially that after any reverse Easton iteration of closed forcing, such as the Laver preparation, every supercompactness measure on a supercompact cardinal extends a measure from the ground model. Thus, such forcing can create no new supercompact cardinals, and, if the GCH holds, neither can it increase the degree of supercompactness of any cardinal; in particular, it can create no new measurable cardinals. In a crescendo of what I call exact preservation theorems, I use this new technology to perform a kind of partial Laver preparation, and thereby finely control the class of posets which preserve a supercompact cardinal. Eventually, I prove the `As You Like It' Theorem, which asserts that the class of ${<}\kappa$-directed closed posets which preserve a supercompact cardinal $\kappa$ can be made by forcing to conform with any pre-selected local definition which respects the equivalence of forcing. Along the way I separate completely the levels of the superdestructibility hierarchy, and, in an epilogue, prove that the notions of fragility and superdestructibility are orthogonal---all four combinations are possible.

Categories: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Two Sorts

Abstract: RS-frames were introduced by Gehrke as relational semantics for substructural logics. They are two-sorted structures, based on RS-polarities with additional relations used to interpret modalities. We propose an intuitive, epistemic interpretation of RS-frames for modal logic, in terms of categorization systems and agents' subjective interpretations of these systems. Categorization systems are a key to any decision-making process and are widely studied in the social and management sciences. A set of objects together with a set of properties and an incidence relation connecting objects with their properties forms a polarity which can be `pruned' into an RS-polarity. Potential categories emerge as the Galois-stable sets of this polarity, just like the concepts of Formal Concept Analysis. An agent's beliefs about objects and their properties (which might be partial) is modelled by a relation which gives rise to a normal modal operator expressing the agent's beliefs about category membership. Fixed-points of the iterations of the belief modalities of all agents are used to model categories constructed through social interaction.

Division by zero

Abstract: For any sufficiently strong theory of arithmetic, the set of Diophantine equations provably unsolvable in the theory is algorithmically undecidable, as a consequence of the MRDP theorem. In contrast, we show decidability of Diophantine equations provably unsolvable in Robinson's arithmetic Q. The argument hinges on an analysis of a particular class of equations, hitherto unexplored in Diophantine literature. We also axiomatize the universal fragment of Q in the process.

Definable regularity lemmas for NIP hypergraphs

Abstract: We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the results from [L. Lovasz, B. Szegedy, "Regularity partitions and the topology of graphons", An irregular mind, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, 415-446]. Besides, we revise the two extremal cases of regularity for stable and distal hypergraphs, improving and generalizing the results from [A. Chernikov, S. Starchenko, "Regularity lemma for distal structures", J. Eur. Math. Soc. 20 (2018), 2437-2466] and [M. Malliaris, S. Shelah, "Regularity lemmas for stable graphs", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 366.3, 2014, 1551-1585]. Finally, we consider a related question of the existence of large (approximately) homogeneous definable subsets of NIP hypergraphs and provide some positive results and counterexamples.

Linear Logic Properly Displayed

Abstract: We introduce proper display calculi for intuitionistic, bi-intuitionistic and classical linear logics with exponentials, which are sound, complete, conservative, and enjoy cut-elimination and subformula property. Based on the same design, we introduce a variant of Lambek calculus with exponentials, aimed at capturing the controlled application of exchange and associativity. Properness (i.e. closure under uniform substitution of all parametric parts in rules) is the main interest and added value of the present proposal, and allows for the smoothest proof of cut-elimination. Our proposal builds on an algebraic and order-theoretic analysis of linear logic, and applies the guidelines of the multi-type methodology in the design of display calculi.

Can you take Toernquist's inaccessible away?

Abstract: We prove that ZF + DC + ”There are no mad families” is equiconsistent with ZFC.

Constructive Canonicity of Inductive Inequalities

Abstract: We prove the canonicity of inductive inequalities in a constructive meta-theory, for classes of logics algebraically captured by varieties of normal and regular lattice expansions. This result encompasses Ghilardi-Meloni's and Suzuki's constructive canonicity results for Sahlqvist formulas and inequalities, and is based on an application of the tools of unified correspondence theory. Specifically, we provide an alternative interpretation of the language of the algorithm ALBA for lattice expansions: nominal and conominal variables are respectively interpreted as closed and open elements of canonical extensions of normal/regular lattice expansions, rather than as completely join-irreducible and meet-irreducible elements of perfect normal/regular lattice expansions. We show the correctness of ALBA with respect to this interpretation. From this fact, the constructive canonicity of the inequalities on which ALBA succeeds follows by an adaptation of the standard argument. The claimed result then follows as a consequence of the success of ALBA on inductive inequalities.

The reverse mathematics of Ramsey-type theorems

Abstract: In this thesis, we investigate the computational content and the logical strength of Ramsey's theorem and its consequences. For this, we use the frameworks of reverse mathematics and of computable reducibility. We proceed to a systematic study of various Ramsey-type statements under a unified and minimalistic framework and obtain a precise analysis of their interrelations. We clarify the role of the number of colors in Ramsey's theorem. In particular, we show that the hierarchy of Ramsey's theorem induced by the number of colors is strictly increasing over computable reducibility, and exhibit in reverse mathematics an infinite decreasing hiearchy of Ramsey-type theorems by weakening the homogeneity constraints. These results tend to show that the Ramsey-type statements are not robust, that is, slight variations of the statements lead to strictly different subsystems. Finally, we pursuit the analysis of the links between Ramsey's theorems and compacity arguments, by extending Liu's theorem to several Ramsey-type statements and by proving its optimality under various aspects.

Closures and generating sets related to combinations of structures

Abstract: We investigate closure operators and describe their properties for $E$-combinations and $P$-combinations of structures and their theories. We prove, for $E$-combinations, that the existence of a minimal generating set of theories is equivalent to the existence of the least generating set, and characterize syntactically and semantically the property of the existence of the least generating set. For the class of linearly ordered language uniform theories we solve the problem of the existence of least generating set with respect to $E$-combinations and characterize that existence in terms of orders.

Undecidability of the Lambek calculus with a relevant modality

Abstract: Morrill and Valentin in the paper "Computational coverage of TLG: Nonlinearity" considered an extension of the Lambek calculus enriched by a so-called "exponential" modality. This modality behaves in the "relevant" style, that is, it allows contraction and permutation, but not weakening. Morrill and Valentin stated an open problem whether this system is decidable. Here we show its undecidability. Our result remains valid if we consider the fragment where all division operations have one direction. We also show that the derivability problem in a restricted case, where the modality can be applied only to variables (primitive types), is decidable and belongs to the NP class.

Slow and Ordinary Provability for Peano Arithmetic

Abstract: The notion of slow provability for Peano Arithmetic ($\mathsf{PA}$) was introduced by S.D. Friedman, M. Rathjen, and A. Weiermann. They studied the slow consistency statement $\mathrm{Con}_{\mathsf{s}}$ that asserts that a contradiction is not slow provable in $\mathsf{PA}$. They showed that the logical strength of $\mathsf{PA}+\mathrm{Con}_{\mathsf{s}}$ lies strictly between that of $\mathsf{PA}$ and $\mathsf{PA}$ together with its ordinary consistency: $\mathsf{PA}\subsetneq \mathsf{PA}+\mathrm{Con}_{\mathsf{s}}\subsetneq \mathsf{PA}+\mathrm{Con}$. This paper is a further investigation into slow provability and its interplay with ordinary provability in $\mathsf{PA}$. We study three variants of slow provability. The associated consistency statement of each of these yields a theory that lies strictly between $\mathsf{PA}$ and $\mathsf{PA}+\mathrm{Con}$ in terms of logical strength. We investigate Turing-Feferman progressions based on these variants of slow provability. We show that for our three notions, the Turing-Feferman progression reaches $\mathsf{PA}+\mathrm{Con}$ in a different numbers of steps, namely $\varepsilon_0$, $\omega$, and $2$. For each of the three slow provability predicates, we also determine its joint provability logic with ordinary $\mathsf{PA}$-provability.

Brooks's theorem for measurable colorings

Abstract: We generalize Brooks's theorem to show that if $G$ is a Borel graph on a standard Borel space $X$ of degree bounded by $d \geq 3$ which contains no $(d+1)$-cliques, then $G$ admits a $\mu$-measurable $d$-coloring with respect to any Borel probability measure $\mu$ on $X$, and a Baire measurable $d$-coloring with respect to any compatible Polish topology on $X$. The proof of this theorem uses a new technique for constructing one-ended spanning subforests of Borel graphs, as well as ideas from the study of list colorings. We apply the theorem to graphs arising from group actions to obtain factor of IID $d$-colorings of Cayley graphs of degree $d$, except in two exceptional cases.

Reducts of finitely bounded homogeneous structures, and lifting tractability from finite-domain constraint satisfaction

Abstract: Many natural decision problems can be formulated as constraint satisfaction problems for reducts of finitely bounded homogeneous structures. This class of problems is a large generalisation of the class of CSPs over finite domains. Our first result is a general polynomial-time reduction from such infinite-domain CSPs to finite-domain CSPs. We use this reduction to obtain new powerful polynomial-time tractability conditions that can be expressed in terms of topological polymorphism clones. Moreover, we study the subclass C of CSPs for structures that are first-order definable over equality with parameters. Also this class C properly extends the class of all finite-domain CSPs. We formulate a tractability conjecture for C and show that it is equivalent to the finite-domain tractability conjecture. In our proof we develop new algebraic techniques that help to prove continuity for certain clone homomorphisms needed for showing hardness.

Logic Blog 2015f

Abstract: The blog focusses on algorithmic randomness and its connections to quantum information theory, group theory and its connections to logic, and computability analogs of cardinal characteristics.

Cutting lemma and Zarankiewicz's problem in distal structures

Abstract: We establish a cutting lemma for definable families of sets in distal structures, as well as the optimality of the distal cell decomposition for definable families of sets on the plane in $o$-minimal expansions of fields. Using it, we generalize the results in [J. Fox, J. Pach, A. Sheffer, A. Suk, and J. Zahl. "A semi-algebraic version of Zarankiewicz's problem"] on the semialgebraic planar Zarankiewicz problem to arbitrary $o$-minimal structures, in particular obtaining an $o$-minimal generalization of the Szemeredi-Trotter theorem.

Constructive canonicity for lattice-based fixed point logics

Abstract: We prove the algorithmic canonicity of two classes of $\mu$-inequalities in a constructive meta-theory of normal lattice expansions. This result simultaneously generalizes Conradie and Craig's canonicity for $\mu$-inequalities based on a bi-intuitionistic bi-modal language, and Conradie and Palmigiano's constructive canonicity for inductive inequalities (restricted to normal lattice expansions to keep the page limit). Besides the greater generality, the unification of these strands smoothes the existing treatments for the canonicity of $\mu$-formulas and inequalities. In particular, the rules of the algorithm ALBA used for this result have exactly the same formulation as those of Conradie and Palmigiano, with no additional rule added specifically to handle the fixed point binders. Rather, fixed points are accounted for by certain restrictions on the application of the rules, concerning the order-theoretic properties of the term functions associated with the formulas to which the rules are applied.

Cichon's Diagram for uncountable cardinals

Abstract: We develop a version of Cichon's diagram for cardinal invariants on the generalized Cantor space 2^kappa or the generalized Baire space kappa^kappa where kappa is an uncountable regular cardinal. For strongly inaccessible kappa, many of the ZFC-results about the order relationship of the cardinal invariants which hold for omega generalize; for example we obtain a natural generalization of the Bartoszynski-Raisonnier-Stern Theorem. We also prove a number of independence results, both with

Model theory of $\mathrm{C}^*$-algebras

Abstract: We begin the systematic model theoretic study of $\mathrm{C}^*$-algebras using the tools of continuous logic.

A Borel maximal eventually different family

Abstract: We construct a Borel maximal eventually different family.

Algorithmic correspondence and canonicity for non-distributive logics

Abstract: We extend the theory of unified correspondence to a very broad class of logics with algebraic semantics given by varieties of normal lattice expansions (LEs), also known as `lattices with operators'. Specifically, we introduce a very general syntactic definition of the class of Sahlqvist formulas and inequalities, which applies uniformly to each LE-signature and is given purely in terms of the order-theoretic properties of the algebraic interpretations of the logical connectives. Together with this, we introduce a variant of the algorithm ALBA, specific to the setting of LEs, which effectively computes first-order correspondents of LE-inequalities, and is guaranteed to succeed on a wide class of inequalities (the so-called inductive inequalities) which significantly extend the Sahlqvist class. Further, we show that every inequality on which ALBA succeeds is canonical. The projection of these results yields state-of-the-art correspondence theory for many well known substructural logics, such as the Lambek calculus and its extensions, the Lambek-Grishin calculus, the logic of (not necessarily distributive) de Morgan lattices, and the multiplicative-additive fragment of linear logic.

Logics for Propositional Determinacy and Independence

Abstract: This paper investigates formal logics for reasoning about determinacy and independence. Propositional Dependence Logic D and Propositional Independence Logic I are recently developed logical systems, based on team semantics, that provide a framework for such reasoning tasks. We introduce two new logics L_D and L_I, based on Kripke semantics, and propose them as alternatives for D and I, respectively. We analyze the relative expressive powers of these four logics and discuss the way these systems relate to natural language. We argue that L_D and L_I naturally resolve a range of interpretational problems that arise in D and I. We also obtain sound and complete axiomatizations for L_D and L_I.

A Borel maximal cofinitary group

Abstract: We construct a Borel maximal cofinitary group.

Sahlqvist via Translation

Abstract: In recent years, unified correspondence has been developed as a generalized Sahlqvist theory which applies uniformly to all signatures of normal and regular (distributive) lattice expansions. This includes a general definition of the Sahlqvist and inductive formulas and inequalities in every such signature, based on order theory. This definition covers in particular all (bi-)intuitionistic modal logics. The theory of these logics has been intensively studied over the past seventy years in connection with classical polyadic modal logics, using suitable versions of Goedel-McKinsey-Tarski translations as main tools. It is therefore natural to ask (1) whether a general perspective on Goedel-McKinsey-Tarski translations can be attained, also based on order-theoretic principles like those underlying the general definition of Sahlqvist and inductive formulas and inequalities, which accounts for the known Goedel-McKinsey-Tarski translations and applies uniformly to all signatures of normal (distributive) lattice expansions; (2) whether this general perspective can be used to transfer correspondence and canonicity theorems for Sahlqvist and inductive formulas and inequalities in all signatures described above under Goedel-McKinsey-Tarski translations. In the present paper, we set out to answer these questions. We answer (1) in the affirmative; as to (2), we prove the transfer of the correspondence theorem for inductive inequalities of arbitrary signatures of normal distributive lattice expansions. We also prove the transfer of canonicity for inductive inequalities, but only restricted to arbitrary normal modal expansions of bi-intuitionistic logic. We also analyze the difficulties involved in obtaining the transfer of canonicity outside this setting, and indicate a route to extend the transfer of canonicity to all signatures of normal distributive lattice expansions.

Borel Functors and Infinitary Interpretations

Abstract: We introduce the notion of infinitary interpretation of structures. In general, an interpretation between structures induces a continuous homomorphism between their automorphism groups, and furthermore, it induces a functor between the categories of copies of each structure. We show that for the case of infinitary interpretation the reversals are also true: Every Baire-measurable homomorphism between the automorphism groups of two countable structures is induced by an infinitary interpretation, and every Baire-measurable functor between the set of copies of two countable structures is induced by an infinitary interpretation. Furthermore, we show the complexities are maintained in the sense that if the functor is $\mathbf{\Delta}^0_\alpha$, then the interpretation that induces it is $\Delta^{\mathtt{in}}_\alpha$ up to $\mathbf{\Delta}^0_\alpha$ equivalence.

Randomized feasible interpolation and monotone circuits with a local oracle

Abstract: We generalize the feasible interpolation theorem for semantic derivations from K.(1997) by allowing randomized protocols (protocols in the sense of K.(1997). We also introduce an extension of the monotone circuit model, monotone circuits with a local oracle (CLOs), that does correspond to communication protocols for the monotone Karchmer-Wigderson multi-function $KW^m[U,V]$ making errors. The new randomized feasible interpolation thus shows that a short semantic derivation (from a certain class of derivations larger than in the original method) of the disjointness of $U, V$, $U$ closed upwards, yields a small randomized protocol for and hence a small monotone CLO separating the sets. To establish a lower bound for monotone CLOs separating two NP sets, one closed upwards, is an open problem. This research is motivated by the open problem to establish a lower bound for proof system $R(LIN)$ operating with clauses formed by linear Boolean functions over the 2-element field. The new randomized feasible interpolation applies to this proof system and also to the semantic versions of the cutting planes proof system CP (as randomized protocols efficiently simulate protocols with small real communication complexity of K.(1998)), to small width resolution over CP, R(CP), and to random resolution RR of Buss, Kolodziejczyk and Thapen (2014).

On the consistency of local and global versions of Chang's Conjecture

Abstract: We show that for many pairs of infinite cardinals $\kappa > \mu^+ > \mu$, $(\kappa^{+}, \kappa)\twoheadrightarrow (\mu^+, \mu)$ is consistent relative to the consistency of a supercompact cardinal. We also show that it is consistent, relative to a huge cardinal that $(\kappa^{+}, \kappa)\twoheadrightarrow (\mu^+, \mu)$ for every successor cardinal $\kappa$ and every $\mu < \kappa$, answering a question of Foreman.