scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Psychological Review in 1965"


Journal Article•DOI•

1,028 citations



Journal Article•DOI•

302 citations




Journal Article•DOI•
TL;DR: The results show that in the absence of good proprioceptive information, the presence or absence of "outflow" information makes a difference in accuracy of localizing an object in space.
Abstract: An experiment was designed to determine whether or not the human organism possessed \"outflow\" information derived from monitoring nerve impulses in motor pathways. The experiment focused on the extraocular muscles since proprioceptive input to the central nervous system from these muscles is poor. The results show that in the absence of good proprioceptive information, the presence or absence of \"outflow\" information makes a difference in accuracy of localizing an object in space.

131 citations


Journal Article•DOI•
Harlan Lane1•

126 citations






Journal Article•DOI•
Edwin Martin1•








Journal Article•DOI•
Howard R. Flock1•
TL;DR: The contention that perceived slant is a function primarily of linear perspective is shown to be oversimplified and hardly adequate to cope with the facts.
Abstract: Experiments critical of the effectiveness of variables of optical texture in evoking accurate judgments of slant are shown to be inappropriate, inadequate, or deficient. Experiments supporting linear perspective as a stimulus for slant are evaluated. The contention that perceived slant is a function primarily of linear perspective is shown to be oversimplified and hardly adequate to cope with the facts. Some aspects of Flock's theoretical model specifying optical stimuli for slant are discussed.



Journal Article•DOI•


Journal Article•DOI•
Michael C. Corballis1•


Journal Article•DOI•
TL;DR: The alternative hypothesis is proposed that monocular visual slant is a function primarily of contour perspective which varies with the size, shape, and viewing distance, as well as slant, of plane surfaces.
Abstract: Flock's \"A Possible Optical Basis for Monocular Slant Perception\" is criticized as being a theory of stimuli rather than a theory of perception. To account for accurate monocular slant perception, the theory requires 9 assumptions, including the unproved ability of the eye to register random texture density. The alternative hypothesis is proposed that monocular visual slant is a function primarily of contour perspective which varies with the size, shape, and viewing distance, as well as slant, of plane surfaces.



Journal Article•DOI•