Showing papers in "Psychological Review in 1965"
••
1,028Â citations
••
544Â citations
••
269Â citations
••
194Â citations
••
TL;DR: The results show that in the absence of good proprioceptive information, the presence or absence of "outflow" information makes a difference in accuracy of localizing an object in space.
Abstract: An experiment was designed to determine whether or not the human organism possessed \"outflow\" information derived from monitoring nerve impulses in motor pathways. The experiment focused on the extraocular muscles since proprioceptive input to the central nervous system from these muscles is poor. The results show that in the absence of good proprioceptive information, the presence or absence of \"outflow\" information makes a difference in accuracy of localizing an object in space.
131Â citations
••
126Â citations
••
125Â citations
••
123Â citations
••
93Â citations
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
TL;DR: The contention that perceived slant is a function primarily of linear perspective is shown to be oversimplified and hardly adequate to cope with the facts.
Abstract: Experiments critical of the effectiveness of variables of optical texture in evoking accurate judgments of slant are shown to be inappropriate, inadequate, or deficient. Experiments supporting linear perspective as a stimulus for slant are evaluated. The contention that perceived slant is a function primarily of linear perspective is shown to be oversimplified and hardly adequate to cope with the facts. Some aspects of Flock's theoretical model specifying optical stimuli for slant are discussed.
••
••
••
••
TL;DR: The alternative hypothesis is proposed that monocular visual slant is a function primarily of contour perspective which varies with the size, shape, and viewing distance, as well as slant, of plane surfaces.
Abstract: Flock's \"A Possible Optical Basis for Monocular Slant Perception\" is criticized as being a theory of stimuli rather than a theory of perception. To account for accurate monocular slant perception, the theory requires 9 assumptions, including the unproved ability of the eye to register random texture density. The alternative hypothesis is proposed that monocular visual slant is a function primarily of contour perspective which varies with the size, shape, and viewing distance, as well as slant, of plane surfaces.
••
••