scispace - formally typeset
MonographDOI

A History of Political Science

TLDR
The history of political science is less one of scholars testing and improving theories by reference to data than of their appropriating and transforming ideas, often obscuring or obliterating former meanings, to serve new purposes in shifting political contexts as mentioned in this paper .
Abstract
This Element denaturalises political science, stressing the contestability and contingency of ideas, traditions, subfields, and even the discipline itself. The history of political science is less one of scholars testing and improving theories by reference to data than of their appropriating and transforming ideas, often obscuring or obliterating former meanings, to serve new purposes in shifting political contexts. Political science arose in the late nineteenth century as part of a wider modernism that replaced earlier developmental narratives with more formal explanations. It changed as some scholars yoked together behavioural topics, quantitative techniques, and positivist theory, and as other scholars rejected their doing so. Subfields such as International Relations remained semi-detached and focused on policy as much as theory. Furthermore, the shifting fashions within political science – modernism, behaviouralism, realism, neoliberalism, the new institutionalism – have informed the policies by which governments have tried to tame contingency and govern people.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
MonographDOI

Historians' Virtues

Hermann Paul
TL;DR: The Element identifies major discontinuities in how and why historians talked about the marks of a good scholar and draws attention to long-term legacies that last until today as discussed by the authors .
MonographDOI

A History of Political Science

TL;DR: The history of political science is less one of scholars testing and improving theories by reference to data than of their appropriating and transforming ideas, often obscuring or obliterating former meanings, to serve new purposes in shifting political contexts as mentioned in this paper .
MonographDOI

Confronting Evil in History

Daniel Little
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors highlight the importance of careful, truthful historical investigation of the complicated realities of dark periods in human history, and the possibility of improving our civilization's resilience in the face of the impulses towards cruelty to other human beings.
MonographDOI

Progress and the Scale of History

Tyson Retz
TL;DR: The idea of progress is a product of historical thinking as mentioned in this paper and it is a bold interpretation of history that combines understandings of the past, perceptions of the present and expectations of the future.
MonographDOI

The Transformation of Historical Research in the Digital Age

Ian Milligan
TL;DR: The Transformation of Historical Research in the Digital Age as mentioned in this paper equips historians to be self-conscious practitioners by making these shifts explicit and exploring their long-term impact on their longterm impact.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

TL;DR: The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail, becuase of the nature of these problems as discussed by the authors, whereas science has developed to deal with tame problems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms

TL;DR: The term "New Institutionalism" is a term that now appears with growing frequency in political science as mentioned in this paper, and there is considerable confusion about just what the new institutionalism is, how it differs from other approaches, and what sort of promise or problems it displays.
Journal ArticleDOI

The New Economics of Organization

TL;DR: The work of as discussed by the authors provides political scientists with an overview of the "new economics of organization" and explores its implications for the study of public bureaucracy, which is perhaps best characterized by three elements: a contractual perspective on organizational relationships, a theoretical focus on hierarchical control, and formal analysis via principal-agent models.
Journal ArticleDOI

Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on three aspects of organization: (1) a division-of-labor arrangement called a committee system, (2) a specialization-oflabor system called a jurisdictional arrangement, and (3) a monitoring mechanism by which a parent organization constrains the autonomy of its subunits called an amendment control rule.
BookDOI

The road from Mont Pèlerin : the making of the neoliberal thought collective

TL;DR: The Road from Mont Pelerin this paper is a seminal work in the history of economic thought, focusing on the formation and evolution of modern neoliberalism in the early 1970s.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (3)
What is the Political History?

Political history is characterized by the evolution of ideas, subfields, and the discipline itself, adapting to changing political contexts and theories such as modernism, behaviouralism, realism, and neoliberalism.

What is the history of Saoms in political science?

The provided paper does not mention anything about "Saoms" in political science.

What is the role of history and political science in social development?

The provided paper does not directly address the role of history and political science in social development.