scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal Article•DOI•

A simple mechanism for the efficient provision of public goods - experimental evidence

Josef Falkinger1, Ernst Fehr2, Simon Gächter2, Rudolf Winter-Ebmer3•
University of Regensburg1, University of Zurich2, Johannes Kepler University of Linz3
01 Mar 2000-The American Economic Review (American Economic Association)-Vol. 90, Iss: 1, pp 247-264
TL;DR: In this paper, a series of experiments designed to investigate the factor of incentive mechanisms in the case of private provisions of public goods is presented. But the results showed that the proposed incentive mechanism is very promising.
Abstract: The author reports on a series of experiments designed to investigate the factor of incentive mechanisms in the case of private provisions of public goods. In the Control treatment, there was no mechanism so that subjects faced strong free-riding incentives. In the so-called Falkinger mechanism treatment, the author implemented the Falkinger mechanism. The studies explored the impact of the mechanism in different economic environments. Results showed that the proposed incentive mechanism is very promising. Section I of the paper introduces the mechanism to be examined. Section II discusses the experimental design. Empirical results are provided in Section III, and Section IV interprets these results followed by a summary.

Summary (1 min read)

Jump to:  and [Summary]

Summary

  • In the Control treatment, there was no mechanism so that subjects faced strong free-riding incentives.
  • The studies explored the impact of the mechanism in different economic environments.
  • Results showed that the proposed incentive mechanism is very promising.
  • Empirical results are provided in Section III, and Section IV interprets these results followed by a summary.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

University of Zurich
Zurich Open Repository and Archive
Winterthurerstr. 190
CH-8057 Zurich
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Year: 2000
A simple mechanism for the efficient provision of public goods:
experimental evidence
Falkinger, Josef; Fehr, Ernst; Gächter, Simon; Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf
Falkinger, Josef; Fehr, Ernst; Gächter, Simon; Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf. A simple mechanism for the efficient
provision of public goods: experimental evidence. American Economic Review 2000, 90(1):247-264.
Postprint available at:
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich.
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Originally published at:
American Economic Review 2000, 90(1):247-264
Falkinger, Josef; Fehr, Ernst; Gächter, Simon; Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf. A simple mechanism for the efficient
provision of public goods: experimental evidence. American Economic Review 2000, 90(1):247-264.
Postprint available at:
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich.
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Originally published at:
American Economic Review 2000, 90(1):247-264
A simple mechanism for the efficient provision of public goods:
experimental evidence
Abstract
The author reports on a series of experiments designed to investigate the factor of incentive mechanisms
in the case of private provisions of public goods. In the Control treatment, there was no mechanism so
that subjects faced strong free-riding incentives. In the so-called Falkinger mechanism treatment, the
author implemented the Falkinger mechanism. The studies explored the impact of the mechanism in
different economic environments. Results showed that the proposed incentive mechanism is very
promising. Section I of the paper introduces the mechanism to be examined. Section II discusses the
experimental design. Empirical results are provided in Section III, and Section IV interprets these results
followed by a summary.
Citations
More filters
Journal Article•DOI•
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments

[...]

Urs Fischbacher
07 Feb 2007-Experimental Economics
TL;DR: Z-Tree as mentioned in this paper is a toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, which allows programming almost any kind of experiments in a short time and is stable and easy to use.
Abstract: z-Tree (Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments) is a software for developing and conducting economic experiments. The software is stable and allows programming almost any kind of experiments in a short time. In this article, I present the guiding principles behind the software design, its features, and its limitations.

9,760 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation

[...]

Ernst Fehr1, Klaus M. Schmidt2•
University of Zurich1, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich2
01 Aug 1999-Quarterly Journal of Economics
TL;DR: This paper showed that if some people care about equity, the puzzles can be resolved and that the economic environment determines whether the fair types or the selesh types dominate equilibrium behavior in cooperative games.
Abstract: There is strong evidence that people exploit their bargaining power in competitivemarkets butnot inbilateral bargainingsituations. Thereisalsostrong evidence that people exploit free-riding opportunities in voluntary cooperation games. Yet, when they are given the opportunity to punish free riders, stable cooperation is maintained, although punishment is costly for those who punish. This paper asks whether there is a simple common principle that can explain this puzzling evidence. We show that if some people care about equity the puzzles can be resolved. It turns out that the economic environment determines whether the fair types or the selesh types dominate equilibrium behavior.

8,783 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation

[...]

Ernst Fehr1•
University of Zurich1
01 Mar 1998-Social Science Research Network
TL;DR: This article showed that if a fraction of the people exhibit inequality aversion, stable cooperation is maintained although punishment is costly for those who punish, and they also showed that when they are given the opportunity to punish free riders, stable cooperations are maintained.
Abstract: There is strong evidence that people exploit their bargaining power in competitive markets but not in bilateral bargaining situations. There is also strong evidence that people exploit free-riding opportunities in voluntary cooperation games. Yet, when they are given the opportunity to punish free riders, stable cooperation is maintained although punishment is costly for those who punish. This paper asks whether there is a simple common principle that can explain this puzzling evidence. We show that if a fraction of the people exhibits inequality aversion the puzzles can be resolved.

6,919 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments

[...]

Ernst Fehr, Simon Gächter
01 Sep 2000-The American Economic Review
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that there is a widespread willingness of the cooperators to punish the free-riders, even if punishment is costly and does not provide any material benefits for the punisher.
Abstract: Casual evidence as well as daily experience suggest that many people have a strong aversion against being the 'sucker' in social dilemma situations. As a consequence, those who cooperate may be willing to punish free-riding, even if this is costly for them and even if they cannot expect future benefits from their punishment activities. A main purpose of this paper is to show experimentally that there is indeed a widespread willingness of the cooperators to punish the free-riders. Our results indicate that this holds true even if punishment is costly and does not provide any material benefits for the punisher. In addition, we provide evidence that free-riders are punished the more heavily the more they deviate from the cooperation levels of the cooperators. Potential free-riders, therefore, can avoid or at least reduce punishment by increasing their cooperation levels. This, in turn, suggests that in the presence of punishment opportunities there will be less free riding. Testing this conjecture is the other major aim of our paper.

3,161 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity

[...]

Ernst Fehr, Simon Gächter
01 Aug 2000-Journal of Economic Perspectives
TL;DR: The authors discusses the economic implications of reciprocity and shows that a substantial fraction of people behave according to this dictum: people repay gifts and take revenge even in interactions with complete strangers and even if it is costly for them and yields neither present nor future material rewards.
Abstract: This article discusses the economic implications of reciprocity. A long-standing tradition in economics views human beings as exclusively self-interested. In most economic accounts of individual behavior and aggregate social phenomena, the vast forces of greed are put at the center of the explanation. However, many people deviate from purely self-interested behavior in a reciprocal manner. Reciprocity means that in response to friendly actions, people are frequently much nicer and much more cooperative than predicted by the self-interest model; conversely, in response to hostile actions they are frequently much more nasty and even brutal. There is considerable evidence that a substantial fraction of people behave according to this dictum: People repay gifts and take revenge even in interactions with complete strangers and even if it is costly for them and yields neither present nor future material rewards. This notion of reciprocity is thus very different from kind or hostile responses in repeated interactions that are solely motivated by future material gains.

2,516 citations

References
More filters
Book•
An introduction to the bootstrap

[...]

Bradley Efron1, Robert Tibshirani•
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology1
01 Jan 1993
TL;DR: This article presents bootstrap methods for estimation, using simple arguments, with Minitab macros for implementing these methods, as well as some examples of how these methods could be used for estimation purposes.
Abstract: This article presents bootstrap methods for estimation, using simple arguments. Minitab macros for implementing these methods are given.

37,183 citations

Book•
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences

[...]

Sidney Siegel
01 Jan 1956
TL;DR: This is the revision of the classic text in the field, adding two new chapters and thoroughly updating all others as discussed by the authors, and the original structure is retained, and the book continues to serve as a combined text/reference.
Abstract: This is the revision of the classic text in the field, adding two new chapters and thoroughly updating all others. The original structure is retained, and the book continues to serve as a combined text/reference.

35,552 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments

[...]

Urs Fischbacher
07 Feb 2007-Experimental Economics
TL;DR: Z-Tree as mentioned in this paper is a toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, which allows programming almost any kind of experiments in a short time and is stable and easy to use.
Abstract: z-Tree (Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments) is a software for developing and conducting economic experiments. The software is stable and allows programming almost any kind of experiments in a short time. In this article, I present the guiding principles behind the software design, its features, and its limitations.

9,760 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation

[...]

Ernst Fehr1, Klaus M. Schmidt2•
University of Zurich1, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich2
01 Aug 1999-Quarterly Journal of Economics
TL;DR: This paper showed that if some people care about equity, the puzzles can be resolved and that the economic environment determines whether the fair types or the selesh types dominate equilibrium behavior in cooperative games.
Abstract: There is strong evidence that people exploit their bargaining power in competitivemarkets butnot inbilateral bargainingsituations. Thereisalsostrong evidence that people exploit free-riding opportunities in voluntary cooperation games. Yet, when they are given the opportunity to punish free riders, stable cooperation is maintained, although punishment is costly for those who punish. This paper asks whether there is a simple common principle that can explain this puzzling evidence. We show that if some people care about equity the puzzles can be resolved. It turns out that the economic environment determines whether the fair types or the selesh types dominate equilibrium behavior.

8,783 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure

[...]

Paul A. Samuelson
01 Nov 1954-The Review of Economics and Statistics
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a method to use the information of the user's interaction with the service provider in order to improve the quality of the service provided to the user.
Abstract: Классическая работа лаурета Нобелевской премии по экономике Пола Самуэльсона, заложившая основу современной теории общественных благ. В статье формулируются условия выбора оптимального объема предоставления общественного блага, ныне присутствующие в любом учебнике микроэкономики и экономики общественного сектора.

6,105 citations

Related Papers (5)
A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation

[...]

01 Aug 1999-Quarterly Journal of Economics
Ernst Fehr, Klaus M. Schmidt
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments

[...]

01 Sep 2000-The American Economic Review
Ernst Fehr, Simon Gächter
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments

[...]

07 Feb 2007-Experimental Economics
Urs Fischbacher
Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research

[...]

31 Dec 1995-Research Papers in Economics
John O. Ledyard
Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms

[...]

01 Nov 1999-Social Science Research Network
Margit Osterloh, Margit Osterloh, Bruno S. Frey