scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

A Survey on Multimodal Disinformation Detection

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The state-of-the-art on multimodal disinformation detection covers various combinations of modalities: text, images, audio, video, network structure, and temporal information.
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed the proliferation of fake news, propaganda, misinformation, and disinformation online. While initially this was mostly about textual content, over time images and videos gained popularity, as they are much easier to consume, attract much more attention, and spread further than simple text. As a result, researchers started targeting different modalities and combinations thereof. As different modalities are studied in different research communities, with insufficient interaction, here we offer a survey that explores the state-of-the-art on multimodal disinformation detection covering various combinations of modalities: text, images, audio, video, network structure, and temporal information. Moreover, while some studies focused on factuality, others investigated how harmful the content is. While these two components in the definition of disinformation -- (i) factuality and (ii) harmfulness, are equally important, they are typically studied in isolation. Thus, we argue for the need to tackle disinformation detection by taking into account multiple modalities as well as both factuality and harmfulness, in the same framework. Finally, we discuss current challenges and future research directions.

read more

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking.

Abstract: Fact-checking has become increasingly important due to the speed with which both information and misinformation can spread in the modern media ecosystem. Therefore, researchers have been exploring how fact-checking can be automated, using techniques based on natural language processing, machine learning, knowledge representation, and databases to automatically predict the veracity of claims. In this paper, we survey automated fact-checking stemming from natural language processing, and discuss its connections to related tasks and disciplines. In this process, we present an overview of existing datasets and models, aiming to unify the various definitions given and identify common concepts. Finally, we highlight challenges for future research.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Detecting Harmful Memes and Their Targets

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present HarMeme, the first benchmark dataset containing 3,544 memes related to COVID-19, and annotate the type of target each harmful meme points to: individual, organization, community, or society/general public/other.
Posted Content

Automated Fact-Checking for Assisting Human Fact-Checkers

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors survey the available intelligent technologies that can support the human expert in different steps of her fact-checking endeavor, such as identifying claims worth fact checking, detecting relevant previously fact-checked claims, retrieving relevant evidence to fact-check a claim, and actually verifying a claim.
Posted Content

Detecting Harmful Memes and Their Targets.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present HarMeme, the first benchmark dataset containing 3,544 memes related to COVID-19, and annotate the type of target each harmful meme points to: individual, organization, community, or society/general public/other.
Posted Content

Dataset of Fake News Detection and Fact Verification: A Survey.

Taichi Murayama
- 05 Nov 2021 - 
TL;DR: Li et al. as mentioned in this paper surveyed 118 datasets related to fake news research on a large scale from three perspectives: (1) fake news detection, (2) fact verification, and (3) other tasks; for example, the analysis of fake news and satire detection.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The spread of true and false news online

TL;DR: A large-scale analysis of tweets reveals that false rumors spread further and faster than the truth, and false news was more novel than true news, which suggests that people were more likely to share novel information.
Posted Content

VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Language.

TL;DR: Analysis demonstrates that VisualBERT can ground elements of language to image regions without any explicit supervision and is even sensitive to syntactic relationships, tracking, for example, associations between verbs and image regions corresponding to their arguments.
Proceedings Article

ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Tasks

TL;DR: The ViLBERT model as mentioned in this paper extends the BERT architecture to a multi-modal two-stream model, processing both visual and textual inputs in separate streams that interact through co-attentional transformer layers.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

A Survey on Hate Speech Detection using Natural Language Processing

TL;DR: A survey on hate speech detection describes key areas that have been explored to automatically recognize these types of utterances using natural language processing and discusses limits of those approaches.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Survey on Automatic Detection of Hate Speech in Text

TL;DR: This survey organizes and describes the current state of the field, providing a structured overview of previous approaches, including core algorithms, methods, and main features used, and provides a unifying definition of hate speech.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (3)
Is textual false information research prevalent over images and videos?

The paper does not explicitly state whether textual false information research is more prevalent than research on images and videos.