scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A systematic review of prospective cohort studies in low back pain this article found that psychological factors (notably distress, depressive mood, and somatization) are implicated in the transition from an acute presentation to chronicity.
Abstract
Study Design. A systematic review of prospective cohort studies in low back pain. Objectives. To evaluate the evidence implicating psychological factors in the development of chronicity in low back pain. Summary of Background Data. The biopsychosocial model is gaining acceptance in low back pain, and has provided a basis for screening measurements, guidelines and interventions; however, to date, the unique contribution of psychological factors in the transition from an acute presentation to chronicity has not been rigorously assessed. Methods. A systematic literature search was followed by the application of three sets of criteria to each study: methodologic quality, quality of measurement of psychological factors, and quality of statistical analysis. Two reviewers blindly coded each study, followed by independent assessment by a statistician. Studies were divided into three environments: primary care settings, pain clinics, and workplace. Results. Twenty-five publications (18 cohorts) included psychological factors at baseline. Six of these met acceptability criteria for methodology, psychological measurement, and statistical analysis. Increased risk of chronicity (persisting symptoms and/or disability) from psychological distress/depressive mood and, to a lesser extent, somatization emerged as the main findings. Acceptable evidence generally was not found for other psychological factors, although weak support emerged for the role of catastrophizing as a coping strategy. Conclusion. Psychological factors (notably distress, depressive mood, and somatization) are implicated in the transition to chronic low back pain. The development and testing of clinical interventions specifically targeting these factors is indicated. In view of the importance attributed to other psychological factors (particularly coping strategies and fear avoidance) there is a need to clarify their role in back-related disability through rigorous prospective studies

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society

TL;DR: This guideline is to present the available evidence for evaluation and management of acute and chronic low back pain in primary care settings and grades its recommendations by using the ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system.
Journal ArticleDOI

The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence.

TL;DR: The current state of scientific evidence for the individual components of the fear-avoidance model: pain severity, pain catastrophizing, attention to pain, escape/avoidance behavior, disability, disuse, and vulnerabilities is reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Epidemiology of low back pain.

TL;DR: There is substantial information on low back pain prevalence and estimates of the point prevalence range from 1.0% to 58.1% (mean: 18.1%; median: 15.0%), and 1 year prevalence from 0.8% to 82.5% ( mean: 38.1; median: 37.4%).
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.

TL;DR: A review of reviews to describe methods used to assess the quality of prognosis studies and to describe how well current practices assess potential biases is to develop recommendations to guide future quality appraisal.
References
More filters
Book

Using multivariate statistics

TL;DR: In this Section: 1. Multivariate Statistics: Why? and 2. A Guide to Statistical Techniques: Using the Book Research Questions and Associated Techniques.
Journal ArticleDOI

A power primer.

TL;DR: A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is providedHere the sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests.
Journal ArticleDOI

An inventory for measuring depression

TL;DR: The difficulties inherent in obtaining consistent and adequate diagnoses for the purposes of research and therapy have been pointed out and a wide variety of psychiatric rating scales have been developed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.

TL;DR: In this paper, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was administered to 425 undergraduates and a three component solution comprising (a) rumination, (b) magnification, and (c) helplessness.
Book

Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM

TL;DR: This chapter discusses how to ask clinical questions you can answer and critically assess the evidence for evidence-based medicine, as well as 7 Rapid Reference Cards used in clinical practice.
Related Papers (5)