scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Accountability Agreements in Ontario Hospitals: Are They Fair?

TLDR
A case analysis is conducted of priority setting in a government health care context in Ontario, Canada, assessing how implementation of hospital accountability agreements meets the conditions of a leading international ethical framework for priority setting, A4R.
Abstract
Governments can be accountable for improving the fairness of their priority setting through enhanced transparency and stakeholder engagement. A case analysis is conducted of priority setting in a government health care context in Ontario, Canada, assessing how implementation of hospital accountability agreements meets the conditions of a leading international ethical framework for priority setting, “accountability for reasonableness” (A4R). Hospital accountability agreements provide a mechanism for government to ensure that public funding achieves desired performance in hospitals. A key goal of priority setting is fairness. A4R links priority setting, legitimacy, and fairness to theories of democratic deliberation, making a claim for fairness if the four conditions of relevance, publicity, revision/appeals, and enforcement are satisfied. Regarding the relevance condition, this analysis suggests that government only partially met the relevance condition providing limited stakeholder engagement but with evidence of policy learning and movement toward the establishment of inclusive stakeholder arrangements. Evidence suggests that government eventually progressed toward meeting the publicity condition. Government only partially met the revision/appeals condition and did not meet the enforcement condition, as the other conditions were only partially met. It is our view that regional governance structures in Ontario (i.e., Local Health Integration Networks or LHINs) provide an opportunity for the province to improve the fairness of their accountability agreement processes through enhancing transparency and stakeholder engagement. More broadly, this case study provides a guide for government to enhance accountability by focusing on A4R to improve the fairness of its priority setting.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting

TL;DR: This paper synthesizes the findings from three studies into a framework of ten separate but interconnected elements germane to successful priority setting: stakeholder understanding, shifted priorities/reallocation of resources, decision making quality, stakeholder acceptance and satisfaction, positive externalities, stakeholders engagement, and revision or appeals mechanism.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enhancing measurement of primary health care indicators using an equity lens: An ethnographic study

TL;DR: The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the discourse regarding what ought to be considered a PHC indicator and to provide some concrete examples illustrating the need for modification and development of new indicators given the goal of PHC achieving health equity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Acute care hospitals' accountability to provincial funders.

TL;DR: Examination of accountability documents used in Ontario at the government, regional and acute care hospital levels reveals three trends: the number of performance measures being used in the acute carehospital sector has increased significantly; the focus of the health system has expanded from accountability for funding and service volumes to include accountability for quality and patient safety.
References
More filters
Book

Case Study Research: Design and Methods

Robert K. Yin
TL;DR: In this article, buku ini mencakup lebih dari 50 studi kasus, memberikan perhatian untuk analisis kuantitatif, membahas lebah lengkap penggunaan desain metode campuran penelitian, and termasuk wawasan metodologi baru.
Journal ArticleDOI

Handbook of Qualitative Research

TL;DR: The discipline and practice of qualitative research have been extensively studied in the literature as discussed by the authors, including the work of Denzin and Denzin, and their history in sociology and anthropology, as well as the role of women in qualitative research.
BookDOI

Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research

TL;DR: For instance, King, Keohane, Verba, and Verba as mentioned in this paper have developed a unified approach to valid descriptive and causal inference in qualitative research, where numerical measurement is either impossible or undesirable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain

Peter A. Hall
- 01 Apr 1993 - 
TL;DR: The authors examined the role of ideas in policy making, based on the concept of policy paradigms, and found that a conventional model of social learning fit some types of changes in policy well but not the movement from Keynesian to monetarist modes of policymaking.
Journal ArticleDOI

Handbook of Qualitative Research

Anne Parry
- 01 Jul 2002 - 
Related Papers (5)