scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

An investigation into the current peri-operative nutritional management of oesophageal carcinoma patients in major carcinoma centres in England.

TLDR
The nutritional management of patients following surgery for upper gastrointestinal carcinoma is not uniform with practice varying considerably between centres, and those centres with a dedicated dietitian are more likely to assess patients' nutritional status and provide nutritional support.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with oesophageal carcinoma are at high risk of malnutrition. The aim of this study was to assess current practice for the nutritional management of patients following surgery for oesophageal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS A postal questionnaire was sent to 82 dietetic departments of those hospitals in England identified as major centres for upper gastrointestinal surgery. RESULTS Of the 66 (80%) responses received, 22 (33%) centres routinely perform pre-operative nutritional screening/assessment on oesophageal carcinoma patients. Centres with dietetic support dedicated to these patients are more likely to perform a pre-operative nutritional assessment (n = 17; 55%) than those without (n = 5; 14%; P < 0.001; χ 2 = 12.17). Pre-operative nutritional support is routinely provided in only 11 (17%) centres with the majority of centres (n = 50; 75%), providing it if patients are considered malnourished only. A total of 47 (70%) centres routinely provide postoperative nutritional support with jejunal feeding being the most commonly chosen route. Dedicated dietetic support is provided at 31 (47%) centres. Those centres with a dedicated dietitian are more likely to provide early postoperative nutritional support (n = 27; 87%) than those without (n = 20; 57%; P = 0.007; χ 2 = 7.195) and more likely to review patients routinely following discharge from hospital (n = 25 [81%] with a dietitian versus n = 17 [49%] without; P = 0.007; χ 2 = 7.2). CONCLUSIONS The nutritional management of patients following surgery for upper gastrointestinal carcinoma is not uniform with practice varying considerably between centres. Those centres with a dedicated dietitian are more likely to assess patients’ nutritional status and provide nutritional support.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme.

TL;DR: Postoperative outcomes were studied in relation to adverse nutritional risk, advanced age and co‐morbidity in patients undergoing colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nutritional management during neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer.

TL;DR: Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer are at a high risk for malnutrition due to the effects of chemoradiation, dysphagia, and malignancy induced cachexia, and adequate supplementation as indicated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nutrition Therapy Issues in Esophageal Cancer

TL;DR: The purpose of this article is to review the current literature surrounding the etiology, treatment, and role of nutrition support in improving outcomes in esophageal cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

TL;DR: This randomized pilot and feasibility study will provide preliminary information on the routine use of jejunostomy feeding after hospital discharge in terms of clinical benefits and QoL and inform a multi-centre randomized controlled trial.
Dissertation

A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of early enteral nutrition versus standard management in patients undergoing major resection for gastrointestinal cancer

TL;DR: The present study focused on the management of upper Gastrointestinal Cancers andNutritional Support in Surgical Patients, which involves a combination of parenteral and enteral nutrition, as well as on the design of Clinical Trials and Meta-analysis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Prognostic effect of weight loss prior tochemotherapy in cancer patients

TL;DR: The prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy was analyzed using data from 3,047 patients enrolled in 12 chemotherapy protocols of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and increased with increasing number of anatomic sites involved with metastases, but within categories of Anatomic involvement, weight loss was associated with decreased median survival.
Journal ArticleDOI

Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials

TL;DR: There seems to be no clear advantage to keeping patients nil by mouth after elective gastrointestinal resection, and theoretically, early enteral feeding improves tissue healing and reduces septic complications after gastrointestinal surgery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial

TL;DR: It is concluded that early enteral nutrition significantly reduces the complication rate and duration of postoperative stay compared with parenteral nutrition, although parenTERal nutrition is better tolerated than enteral Nutrition.
Journal ArticleDOI

A randomized controlled trial of preoperative oral supplementation with a specialized diet in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

TL;DR: Preoperative supplementation is as effective as perioperative administration in improving outcome and both strategies seem superior to the conventional approach.
Related Papers (3)