scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
As recall rates increased, sensitivity increased very little beyond a recall rate of 4.8%, and positive predictive value began decreasing significantly at a recall rates of 5.9%.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The performance of screening mammography is measured mainly by its sensitivity, positive predictive value, and cancer detection rate. Recall rates are also suggested as a surrogate measure. The main objective of this study was to measure the effect on sensitivity and positive predictive value as recall rates increase in the community practice of mammography.MATERIALS AND METHODS. Mammography and pathology data are linked in the Carolina Mammography Registry, a population-based registry of screening mammography. Our mammography database is created from prospectively collected data from mammography facilities; the data include information on the woman and the imaging studies. Our pathology database is created from prospectively collected breast pathology data received from pathology sites and the Central Cancer Registry. Women in the registry who were 40 years old and older and who underwent screening mammography between January 1994 and June 1998 were included. “Recall rate” was defined as the p...

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

TL;DR: The accuracy of screening mammography is best in older women and in women with fatty breasts, and the individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and HRT use on mammographic accuracy are examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts.

TL;DR: Screening breast sonography in the population of women with dense breast tissue is useful in detecting small breast cancers that are not detected on mammography or clinical breast examination.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.

TL;DR: Recall and negative open surgical biopsy rates are twice as high in US settings than in the United Kingdom but cancer detection rates are similar; efforts to improve US mammographic screening should target lowering the recall rate without reducing the cancer detection rate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Changes in breast cancer detection and Mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system

TL;DR: The introduction of computer-aided detection into this practice was not associated with statistically significant changes in recall and breast cancer detection rates, both for the entire group of radiologist and for the subset of radiologists who interpreted high volumes of mammograms.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cancer statistics, 2000.

TL;DR: The Surveillance Research Program of the American Cancer Society's Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance Research reports its annual compilation of estimated cancer incidence, mortality, and survival data for the United States in the year 2000.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.

TL;DR: Screening mammography may be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality in women aged 40 to 49 years after 10 to 12 years of follow-up, but the same benefit could probably be achieved by beginning screening at menopause or 50 years of age.
Journal ArticleDOI

Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers

TL;DR: Mammographic breast density appears to be a major risk factor for interval cancer in women participating in mammographic screening from 1988 through 1993.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of Age, Breast Density, and Family History on the Sensitivity of First Screening Mammography

TL;DR: The sensitivity of modern mammography is highest among women aged 50 years and older who have primarily fatty breast density and particularly low when the time between screenings is about 2 years or when women have a family history of breast cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up.

TL;DR: The Swedish Two-County Trial as mentioned in this paper is a randomized controlled trial of invitation to breast cancer screening, with 133,000 women randomized between 1977 and 1979 to regular invitation to screening or to no invitation.
Related Papers (5)