scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

Beyond Scopes: Why creationism is here to stay.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The persistence of creationist beliefs in a population attests to their cognitive affinity as well as their public availability (cf. as discussed by the authors ), and the persistence is not simply the result of fundamentalist politics and socialization, but rather the propensities of the human mind.
Abstract
Despite more than a century of scientific support, the theory of evolution has not been fully assimilated and embraced in contemporary society. Creationist beliefs continue to be endorsed by many adults (Numbers, 1992) and adherents of creation science now enjoy considerable success at the school district level in the United States, advocating that “intelligent design” theory and evolutionary theory be given equal time (Scott, 1994). Why are creationist beliefs so persistent? In this chapter I shall argue that this persistence is not simply the result of fundamentalist politics and socialization. Rather, these social forces themselves depend on certain propensities of the human mind. On this account, the persistence of creationist beliefs in a population attests to their cognitive affinity as well as their public availability (cf. Evans, 1994/1995; Shore, 1996; Sperber, 1996). This chapter offers a broad look at the nature and genesis of beliefs about the origins of species. Recent evidence on the development of children's thinking on this subject is presented in the larger context of an examination of the nature and distribution of creationist and evolutionary beliefs in contemporary society. The chapter begins with a look at the current ideological debate between proponents of evolution versus creation “science.” The case is made that their differences are better understood in terms of dissimilarity in ontological commitment rather than in the capacity to reason scientifically. The next section reviews what is known about the distribution of beliefs about origins among ordinary adults in the population at large.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Are Children “Intuitive Theists”? Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature

TL;DR: This article draws together recent findings from various areas of cognitive developmental research to address the following question: Rather than being “artificialists” in Piagetian terms, are children “intuitive theists’—disposed to view natural phenomena as resulting from nonhuman design?
Journal ArticleDOI

Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: creation versus evolution

TL;DR: Children's natural-history knowledge and religious interest predicted their evolutionist and creationist beliefs, respectively, independently of parent beliefs, and it is argued that this divergent developmental pattern is optimally explained with a model of constructive interactionism.
Journal ArticleDOI

Trust in Testimony: How Children Learn About Science and Religion

TL;DR: Children's understanding of God's special powers and the afterlife shows that their acceptance of others' testimony extends beyond the empirical domain, and children appear to conceptualize unobservable scientific and religious entities similarly.
Journal ArticleDOI

Learning from Others: Children's Construction of Concepts

TL;DR: These findings argue against the simple notion that conceptual development is either supplied by the environment or innately specified, and instead demonstrate how the two work together.
Journal ArticleDOI

Religion is natural

TL;DR: There has been an emerging body of research exploring children's grasp of certain universal religious ideas, suggesting that two foundational aspects of religious belief - belief in mind-body dualism, and belief in divine agents -- come naturally to young children.