Central dynamics of multimass rotating star clusters
read more
Citations
The Intrinsic Shapes of Stellar Systems
Asymmetrical tidal tails of open star clusters: stars crossing their cluster's prah challenge Newtonian gravitation
Long-term evolution of multi-mass rotating star clusters
The impact of stellar evolution on rotating star clusters: the gravothermal-gravogyro catastrophe and the formation of a bar of black holes
A numerical study of stellar discs in galactic nuclei
References
Gravitational N-Body Simulations
Related Papers (5)
On various approaches to investigating the instability of stellar systems with highly elongated stellar orbits
Secular Dynamics in Hierarchical Three-body Systems with Mass Loss and Mass Transfer
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. What is the effect of the massive core in the R100 model?
The massive core in the Rh model is exchanging angular momentum with the non-rotating lower mass particles, which, in turn, reduce the flattening effect slightly; this does not happen in the R100 model.
Q3. What is the radial segregation of the N-body model?
The authors find that N -body models with some isotropic primordial mass segregation develop flatter cores (i.e., higher ∆mz−∆mx), implying that systems that are initially more radially segregated can also reach higher levels of anisotropic mass segregation.
Q4. How long does the model take to reach equilibrium?
Within approximately one half-mass relaxation time, this model goes from spherical to increasingly oblate until equilibrium is reached and the model reaches an ellipticity profile that does not change much over a few relaxation times close to the end of the simulation.
Q5. What is the angular momentum of the initial segregated model?
On the other hand, in the initially segregated models the heavy particles in the centre maintain their angular momentum, therefore increasing the pressure gradient and allowing for further flattening in comparison.
Q6. What is the expected result of the initial non-segregated model?
This is expectedaccording to the dynamical interpretation the authors have presented so far: in the initially non-segregated models, heavy particles in the outer regions must lose angular momentum to move toward the core via mass segregation in the radial direction.
Q7. What is the resulting variation in the pressure gradient scales?
The resulting variation in the pressure gradient scales as −ρ(r)σ2, where ρ(r) is the volume density (see, e.g., Binney & Tremaine 2008).
Q8. What is the role of the oblateness of astronomical bodies?
4.1 The Role of Velocity AnisotropyThe rotation-induced oblateness of astronomical bodies is a classical problem in Newtonian and celestial mechanics (e.g., see Chandrasekhar & Lee 1968, Chandrasekhar 1987, Binney 1978 and most recently Kireeva & Kondratyev 2019).
Q9. What is the reference time scale for the initial half-mass relaxation time?
A reference time scale that the authors have adopted in all their analyses is the initial half-mass relaxation time defined astrh,i = 0.138N1/2r 3/2 h〈m〉1/2G1/2 log(0.11N) (2)where 〈m〉 is the mean stellar mass, and rh is the 3D halfmass radius, the radius enclosing half the mass of the cluster (see e.g. Heggie & Hut 2003).
Q10. What is the role of anisotropy in the rotation of a solid body?
In the following sections, the authors examine the effect of increased velocity anisotropy creating a negative pressure gradient and flattening the rotating core of the cluster.
Q11. What is the difference between the inclination orbits of the heaviest particles?
The figure shows that, in the beginning of the simulation, the inclinations of the heaviest particles are distributed uniformly, but, after some evolution, there are more lower inclination orbits (where cos i = 1 would be the lowest) than higher inclination orbits among the heaviest particles.
Q12. What is the resulting ratio of the heaviest star to the average stellar mass?
For the mass spectrum, the authors adopted a power-law distribution with a slope of -2 and the mass ratio of the heaviest star to the lightest star set to 100 (the resulting ratio of the heaviest star mass to the average stellar mass is ≈ 21).