scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted ContentDOI

ClearSpeechTogether: a rater blinded, single, controlled feasibility study of speech intervention for people with progressive ataxia

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
ClearSpeechTogether as mentioned in this paper is a peer-led group intervention for people with progressive ataxia and mild-moderate speech and gross motor impairment, which consists of four individual sessions over two weeks followed by 20 patient-driven group sessions over four weeks.
Abstract
Abstract Background Progressive ataxias frequently lead to speech disorders and consequently impact on communication participation and psychosocial wellbeing. Whilst recent studies demonstrate the potential for improvements in these areas, these treatments generally require intensive input which can reduce acceptability of the approach. A new model of care – ClearSpeechTogether – is proposed which maximises treatment intensity whilst minimising demands on clinician. This study aimed to establish feasibility and accessibility of this approach and at the same time determine the potential benefits and adverse effects on people with progressive ataxias. Method The study targeted people with progressive ataxia and mild-moderate speech and gross motor impairment. ClearSpeechTogether consisted of four individual sessions over two weeks followed by 20 patient-led group sessions over four weeks. All sessions were provided online. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected for evaluation. Results Nine participants completed treatment. Feasibility and acceptability were high and no adverse effects were reported. Statistical tests found significantly reduced vocal strain, improved intelligibility for reading, and increased participation and confidence. Participant interviews highlighted the value of group support, from psychosocial perspectives and in supporting speech strategy internalisation and generalisation. Discussion ClearSpeechTogether presented an effective intervention in a small group of people with progressive ataxia. It matched or exceeded the outcomes previously reported for intensive, individual therapy while minimising clinician time demands. Furthermore, its unique peer led group intervention design appeared effective in addressing intractable psychosocial issues. ClearSpeechTogether is potentially cost-effective, providing intensive delivery with few clinician sessions, thus maximising the input available from health care providers.

read more

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring the Functional Impact of Fatigue: Initial Validation of the Fatigue Impact Scale

TL;DR: This initial validation study indicates that the FIS has considerable merit as a measure of patient's attribution of functional limitations to symptoms of fatigue.
Journal ArticleDOI

Maximum performance tests of speech production

TL;DR: The published normative data is summarized, the adequacy of these data for clinical application is discussed, and interpretive guidelines to enhance the usefulness of maximum performance tests are recommended.
Journal ArticleDOI

The natural history of degenerative ataxia: a retrospective study in 466 patients.

TL;DR: In FRDA, the time until confinement to wheelchair was shorter in patients with earlier disease onset, suggesting that patients with long GAA repeats and early disease onset have a poor prognosis, and in MSA, later age of onset increased the risk of rapid progression and death.
Journal ArticleDOI

Life with communication changes in Parkinson’s disease

TL;DR: Speech and language changes in PD impact upon individual and family life long before frank impairment of intelligibility is apparent, and the role of early referral to speech and language therapy is therefore worthy of detailed investigation.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB): Item Bank Calibration and Development of a Disorder-Generic Short Form

TL;DR: The CPIB provides speech-language pathologists with a unidimensional, self-report outcomes measurement instrument dedicated to the construct of communicative participation and this instrument may be useful to clinicians and researchers wanting to implement measures of Communicative participation in their work.
Related Papers (4)