Conservation and peak power: cost and demand

TLDR: More jobs can be created and money saved by maximizing energy efficiency than by producing more energy as discussed by the authors, and California, without curtailing economic growth or sacrificing jobs, can supply enough nonnuclear energy with mandated conservation, demonstration, and incentive programs.

Abstract: More jobs can be created and money saved by maximizing energy efficiency than by producing more energy. California, without curtailing economic growth or sacrificing jobs, can supply enough nonnuclear energy with mandated conservation, demonstration, and incentive programs. Projected increases in demand, historically based on declining rates and increasing substitution of electricity for other fuels, are no longer appropriate. Options include raising the efficiency of equipment and structures and shifting demand from peak periods. Quarter horsepower engines, for example, have less than half the efficiency in 1975 as some comparable 1940 models. State policies could be instrumental in directing efficient end uses for each fuel. Comparisons with other countries reveal that the U.S. uses about twice as much energy per capita as several developed countries without a higher per capita income. (DCK)