scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Construct validity of two categories of assessment center dimension ratings

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The construct validity of assessment center final dimension ratings was examined within a nomologicai network of cognitive and personality measures as mentioned in this paper, and it was found that several cognitive ability measures related more strongly to performance-s tyle dimension ratings than to interpersonal-style dimension ratings.
Abstract
The construct validity of assessment center final dimension ratings was examined within a nomologicai network of cognitive and personality measures. Four hundred forty-one employees of a large mid-western petroleum company were assessed on 11 dimensions in two broad categories and completed four tests. Results showed that several cognitive ability measures related more strongly to performance-s tyle dimension ratings than to interpersonal -style dimension ratings, providing evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Correlation analysis and factor analysis support the two a priori interpersonal- and performance-style categories. The results suggest that final dimension ratings possess construct validity and that assessors can differentiate between two broad categories of assessment dimensions.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book

Psychological Testing : An Introduction

TL;DR: The history of psychological testing can be found in this paper, where the authors discuss the nature of tests, reliability and validity of tests and their application in a wide range of settings.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Ratings: A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Methodological Factors

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a systematic review of the assessment center literature with respect to specific design and methodological characteristics that potentially moderate the construct-related validity of assessment center ratings.
Journal ArticleDOI

A new frame for frame-of-reference training: enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers.

TL;DR: Results from 58 assessees and 122 assessors suggested that FOR training was effective at improving the reliability, accuracy, convergent and discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity of assessment center ratings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: a meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings.

TL;DR: The results indicate that the 7 summary AC dimensions postulated by W. Edens (2003) are distinguishable from popular individual difference constructs and explain a sizeable proportion of variance in job performance beyond cognitive ability and personality.
Journal ArticleDOI

A meta-analytic evaluation of the impact of dimension and exercise factors on assessment center ratings.

TL;DR: The authors recoded and combined past matrices into a single MTMM matrix, comprised of 6 dimensions each measured by 6 exercises, providing a more generalizable set of results.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

TL;DR: This transmutability of the validation matrix argues for the comparisons within the heteromethod block as the most generally relevant validation data, and illustrates the potential interchangeability of trait and method components.
Journal ArticleDOI

Construct validity in psychological tests.

TL;DR: The present interpretation of construct validity is not "official" and deals with some areas where the Committee would probably not be unanimous, but the present writers are solely responsible for this attempt to explain the concept and elaborate its implications.
Book

Essentials of psychological testing

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the use of tests and test interpretation for various purposes, e.g., personality measurement through self-report, personality test interpretation, and personnel selection.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance

TL;DR: In this article, a meta-analysis of the cumulative research on various predictors of job performance shows that for entry-level jobs there is no predictor with validity equal to that of ability, which has a mean validity of.53.
Related Papers (5)