scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook ChapterDOI

Consultative Committee For Space Data Systems

Martin Pilgram
- pp 523-531
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The article describes the work of CCSDS till its beginning in the 80s till today, when the committee was incorporated as a subcommittee of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
Abstract
The major space agencies of the world recognize that there are benefits in using standard techniques for handling space data and that, by cooperatively developing these techniques, future data system interoperability will be enhanced. In order to assure that work towards standardization of space-related information technologies provides the maximum benefi t for the interested agencies, both individually and collectively, an international Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) was established in 1982 as a forum for international cooperation in the development of data handling techniques supporting space research, including space science and applications. In 1991, the committee was incorporated as a subcommittee of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The article describs the work of CCSDS till its beginning in the 80s till today (2009).

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems
I. Introduction
e major space agencies of the world recognize that there are bene ts
in using standard techniques for handling space data and that, by coop-
eratively developing these techniques, future data system interoperability
will be enhanced. In order to assure that work towards standardization of
space-related information technologies provides the maximum bene t for
the interested agencies, both individually and collectively, an international
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) was established
in 1982 as a forum for international cooperation in the development of data
handling techniques supporting space research, including space science and
applications. In 1991, the committee was incorporated as a subcommittee of
the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
e original participants in the development and approval of the CCSDS
Charter were CNES (France), DLR (Germany, at that time DFVLR), ESA
(Europe), ISRO (India), INPE (Brazil), NASA (USA), JAXA (Japan, at that
time NASDA).  e Charter was updated in May 1999 and again in Septem-
ber 2004. It should be noted that the revisions of the charter were essentially
re-organizations of the working methods and not changes to topics to be
addressed.
II. Origins and Development
As the space age evolved in the 1960s and 1970s, there was increasing inter-
est in stimulating international cooperation as a way to enhance space explo-
ration. In particular, since many space agencies had invested large sums of
money in the development of space mission support infrastructure on the
ground, the concept of ‘cross support’ emerged whereby one agency could
o er its data handling services to another and thus enhance the opportuni-
ties for conducting international missions. During those early days, in the
absence of any internationally agreed space data standards, cross support
was generally handled by the introduction of ‘black box’ adapters to forge
compatibility at the interfaces between agencies.  ese black boxes were
uniquely con gured for each individual case.
TIETJE_F5_493-634.indd 515TIETJE_F5_493-634.indd 515 7/3/2009 8:29:21 PM7/3/2009 8:29:21 PM

As space exploration moved along into the 1980s, technological advances
in spacecra computation, memory, and communications capabilities made
it feasible to start standardizing the ways in which spacecra and ground
data systems exchanged information. At the same time, the costs of imple-
menting and operating these more capable space missions were increasing
signi cantly. To take advantage of the opportunities presented by the tech-
nological advances and to meet the  scal challenges, some initial steps were
taken which ultimately lead to the
formation of the CCSDS. In March 1981, the NASA-ESA Working Group
(NEWG) held its  rst meeting to address cooperative development of space
data standards, initially in the areas of spacecra ‘packet telemetry’ (tech-
nology that allows the remote measurement and receipt of information)
and then in ‘packet telecommand’ (technology that allows a system to be
remotely operated by sending information and instructions to it). In January
1982, at an International Workshop on Space Data Systems held in Wash-
ington, D.C., this bilateral activity was broadened and many of the world’s
space agencies met to begin discussing common problems relative to space
information and data systems. At that meeting, the  nal steps were taken to
formalize international space data standardization activities by creating the
CCSDS, which then had its inaugural meeting at CNES in Toulouse, France
on 4–8 October 1982.
e CCSDS was chartered to study the problems of cross support and,
through the collective e orts of its international experts, to develop advanced
standardized solutions to these challenges of exchanging space mission data.
ese solutions, called CCSDS Recommendations, were the primary prod-
ucts of the CCSDS for most of its  rst 20 years. Dra CCSDS Recommend-
ations were created, reviewed by CCSDS participating agencies and were
subsequently adopted by the CCSDS participating agencies as  nal CCSDS
Recommendations that served to guide the internal development of stan-
dards by each of the members.  ese early CCSDS activities signi cantly
enhanced the planning and execution of cooperative space missions  own
by the participating agencies.
e initial structure of CCSDS, adopted in 1982, centred around technical
‘panels’ to develop standard Recommendations in various space data system
areas.  e initial structure was:
Panel 1: Telemetry, Tracking, and Command;
Panel 2: Information Interchange Processes;
Panel 3: Cross Support Operations; and
Panel 4: Radio-metric and Orbit Data.
516 Martin Pilgram
TIETJE_F5_493-634.indd 516TIETJE_F5_493-634.indd 516 7/3/2009 8:29:22 PM7/3/2009 8:29:22 PM

e space-to-ground data link was the  rst part of the data system to be
addressed by CCSDS, primarily because it is unique to space missions and
is constrained by the stressed communications environment. Based on the
precursor work by NASA and ESA, CCSDS Panel 1 soon presented concrete
results in the form of two  nal CCSDS Recommendations, one for ‘Packet
Telemetry’ and one for ‘Telemetry Channel Coding’. Panel 1 quickly followed
through with standards for space channel modulation, packet telecommand,
time code formats and – by the end of the 1980s – with the ‘advanced orbit-
ing systems’ standards that became the data communications baseline for the
International Space Station. Meanwhile, Panel 2 rapidly developed new stan-
dards for exchanging information among scienti c and engineering users;
Panel 3 began developing the ‘space link extension’ standards that could
allow one agency’s control centre to connect to another agency’s ground
station; and Panel 4 developed standards for exchanging radio-metric infor-
mation.
In 1991, the CCSDS entered into a cooperative arrangement with the
International Organization for Standardization. Under this arrangement,
CCSDS Recommendations were advanced to Subcommittee 13 within Tech-
nical Committee 20 (Aircra and Space Vehicles) where, via the normal ISO
procedures of review and voting, they are progressed into full International
Standards.
III. Membership
Four types of participation exist within the CCSDS: Members (11); Observ-
ers (26); Liaisons (12); and Associates (>100). While within CCSDS space
agencies are the building blocks, in ISO the speci c countries are the voting
bodies. At  rst sight this might seem to be problematic, but apart from ESA,
the representatives of the national space agencies are also the national rep-
resentatives of the standardization bodies in ISO.
Member Agencies
A CCSDS Member Agency is a governmental or quasi-governmental organ-
ization that fully participates in all CCSDS activities and provides a com-
mensurate level of support. Only one agency representing a given country
or multinational organization may participate as a Member Agency of the
CCSDS. A Member Agency adopts the Charter and must ensure that their
agency enforces internal standards to the applicable CCSDS Recommended
Standards.
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems 517
TIETJE_F5_493-634.indd 517TIETJE_F5_493-634.indd 517 7/3/2009 8:29:22 PM7/3/2009 8:29:22 PM

Member Agencies have CCSDS voting rights, which are exercised through
Member Agency Representatives. Member Agency Representatives make up
the CCSDS Management Council (CMC), where decisions on the business
and direction of the CCSDS are taken.
In 2009, the following 11 agencies were members of CCSDS: ASI (Italy),
BNSC (Great Britain), CNSA (China National Space Administration), CSA
(Canada), CNES (France), DLR (Germany), ESA (Europe), FSA (Russia),
INPE (Brazil), JAXA (Japan), and NASA (USA).
Observer Agencies
26 governmental or quasi-governmental organizations participate in CCSDS
activities at a reduced level as Observer Agencies.  ey are encouraged but
not expected to make best e orts to ensure the adherence of their agency’s
internal standards to the applicable CCSDS Recommended Standards.  ere
is no limit on the number of national or multinational agencies that may
participate as Observer Agencies.
Liaisons
Liaison organizations are governmental or private entities with developmen-
tal programmes in the areas of space-related data and information systems.
When Liaison participation occurs, it is usually focused on a particular sub-
ject of interest to the Liaison organization. In 2008, the organizations with
agreements or pending agreements with CCSDS were:
American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics;
– CEOS;
– COSPAR;
European Committee for Space Standardization (ECSS);
Interagency Operations Advisory Group (IOAG);
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing;
ISO/IEC JTC 1 SC 2;
National Archives and Records Administration;
National Information Standards Organization;
Norwegian Technology Standards Institution;
Object Management Group Inc.; and
World Meteorological Organization.
Associates
Associates include more than 100 scienti c and industrial entities that aim to
more closely monitor and possibly in uence the technical document devel-
opment process in CCSDS.
518 Martin Pilgram
TIETJE_F5_493-634.indd 518TIETJE_F5_493-634.indd 518 7/3/2009 8:29:22 PM7/3/2009 8:29:22 PM

IV. Organizational Structure
In 2003, a er more than 20 years of success, and recognizing the need to
streamline and broaden its processes, the CCSDS went through a structural
re-organization based on a model that was used successfully by the Internet
Engineering Task Force (IETF) to develop the terrestrial Internet. Within the
new CCSDS organization, six broad discipline ‘Areas’ were created:
– System Engineering Services;
Mission Operations and Information Management Services;
– Cross Support Services;
– Spacecra Onboard Interface Services;
Space Link Services; and
– Space Internetworking Services
Within each of these Areas, specialized Working Groups were created to
develop ‘Recommended Standards’ which are normally transferred into ISO
standards. Additional categories of ‘Recommended Practices’ and ‘Experi-
mental’ standards were also added to the speci cation hierarchy.
Management Structure
As outlined above, the CCSDS consists of Member Agencies, Observer Agen-
cies, Associates and Liaisons.  e CCSDS Management Council (CMC) is
the executive management oversight group of the organization.  e CMC
is comprised of the Member Agencies who each appoint one Principal Del-
egate.  ese Members select the CMC chairman on a rotating basis, although
in practice, the rotation is activated less frequently than it should be.  e
CMC is responsible for staying technically and politically informed about
important long-term issues in the  eld of international space mission cross
support and for keeping an eye on the ‘big picture’ of the CCSDS pro-
gramme of work. It therefore focuses on long-range planning and coordina-
tion among the various CCSDS discipline-oriented domains, on making sure
that adequate resources exist to do work, and that customer requirements are
satis ed in a timely manner.
e CCSDS Engineering Steering Group (CESG) is the forum in which the
Area Directors synchronize the overall technical programme of work.  e
CESG reports to the CMC, and is divided into three ‘domains’ – space tele-
matics; space systems; and space informatics.  e space telematics domain
covers three areas: spacecra onboard interface services; space link services;
and space internetworking services.  e space systems domain is concerned
with systems engineering, while the space informatics domain deals with
mission operations and information management, as well as cross support
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems 519
TIETJE_F5_493-634.indd 519TIETJE_F5_493-634.indd 519 7/3/2009 8:29:22 PM7/3/2009 8:29:22 PM

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data

TL;DR: The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Plato: a service oriented decision support system for preservation planning

TL;DR: This paper presents a service-oriented architecture and decision support tool that implements a solid preservation planning process and integrates services for content characterisation, preservation action and automatic object comparison to provide maximum support for preservation planning endeavours.
Journal ArticleDOI

A new Digital Dark Age? Collaborative web tools, social media and long-term preservation

Stuart Jeffrey
- 05 Dec 2012 - 
TL;DR: Examination of the impact of exciting new approaches to open data sharing, collaborative web tools and social media on the sustainability of archaeological data examines potential changes in the nature of archaeological dialogue and information sharing and proposes solutions that might mitigate a second ‘Digital Dark Age’.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Delay/Disruption-Tolerant Networking: Flight test results from the international space station

TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the design and features of the DTN-on-ISS implementation as well as reporting initial results from the experimental deployment, and describe DTN's performance on the International Space Station.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pairwise Orthogonal Transform for Spectral Image Coding

TL;DR: A novel transform based on the Karhunen-Loêve transform is introduced, which, while obtaining a better coding performance than the wavelets, does not have the mentioned disadvantages of the KLT.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Integrated services digital network

TL;DR: This chapter reviews the concept of an integrated services digital network or ISDN, which is the first network-based standard for simultaneous integrated voice, data, and image signal transmission and allows users to achieve convenience, flexibility, and economy.

Data type

TL;DR: A data type is an interpretation applied to a string of bits that combines real, integer, double precision, logical, logical ("Boolean"), character, pointer, and label.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Consultative committee for space data systems" ?

The International Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems ( CCSDS ) was established in 1982 as a forum for international cooperation in the development of data handling techniques supporting space research, including space science and applications this paper. 

Commercial development and technology advances are also predicted to drive the need for new space standards; for example, the increasing capability of small satellites allied to micro systems technology and a potential paradigm shift in the development of low cost systems. 

Within the new CCSDS organization, six broad discipline ‘Areas’ were created:– System Engineering Services; – Mission Operations and Information Management Services; – Cross Support Services; – Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services; – Space Link Services; and – Space Internetworking ServicesWithin each of these Areas, specialized Working Groups were created to develop ‘Recommended Standards’ which are normally transferred into ISO standards. 

Associates include more than 100 scientifi c and industrial entities that aim to more closely monitor and possibly infl uence the technical document development process in CCSDS. 

All of the secretarial, administrative, technical, and infrastructural support is funded by the Agency that holds the CCSDS chair in a given year. 

Protocols for the data links that unite the space elements, the ground elements and the users (SC-13); and – Design, test, operations, and ground support for space vehicles and their attendant systems (SC-14). 

Responding to the needs of an increasingly commercial and global space business these subcommittees have established a signifi cant portfolio of standards. 

ISO also off ers the Industry Technical Agreement (ITA) as a deliverable that aims to bridge the gap between the activities of consortia and the formal process of standardization represented by ISO and its national members. 

Th e CMC is responsible for staying technically and politically informed about important long-term issues in the fi eld of international space mission cross support and for keeping an eye on the ‘big picture’ of the CCSDS programme of work. 

Within the scope of the Technical Committee for Aircraft and Space Vehicles (TC-20), two subcommittees were formed with responsibility for all ISO work in the area of standards for space systems. 

To better align a growing work programme with business needs and trends and to manage an expanding portfolio of standards both subcommittees have introduced major internal organizational processes. 

A Member Agency adopts the Charter and must ensure that their agency enforces internal standards to the applicable CCSDS Recommended Standards.