scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Contours of diversity management and triple loop learning

Robert L. Flood, +1 more
- 01 Oct 1996 - 
- Vol. 25, pp 154-163
TLDR
This book introduces diversity management as managing the increased diversity of issues that confront humankind in contemporary organizational and societal affairs and provides a “quickmap” of the contours of diversity management and triple loop learning.
Abstract
Introduces diversity management as managing the increased diversity of issues that confront humankind in contemporary organizational and societal affairs. Defines triple loop learning as being about the increase in the fullness and deepness of learning about the diversity of issues and dilemmas faced. Presents the contours of diversity management and triple loop learning. Sees the latter as the denouement of single loop learning and of double loop learning. Provides a “quickmap” of the contours of diversity management and triple loop learning.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes

TL;DR: In this article, the authors develop a conceptual framework addressing the dynamics and adaptive capacity of resource governance regimes as multi-level learning processes, where the influence of formal and informal institutions, the role of state and non-state actors, the nature of multilevel interactions and the relative importance of bureaucratic hierarchies, markets and networks are identified as major structural characteristics of governance regimes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine five dimensions of the learning paradox in the context of adaptive co-management, where the learning and linking functions of governance are stressed: (i) definitions of learning, (ii) learning goals and expectations; (iii) mechanisms by which learning takes place; (iv) questions regarding who is involved in the process of learning; and (v) the risks and ethical ambiguities faced by different actors expected to willingly participate in a learning process, whether formal or informal.
Book

Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education

Anne Brockbank, +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of learning theories and requirements for reflection and reflective practice is presented.Acknowledgements to second edition Acknowledgements to first edition Part I Learning and reflection Our themes Learning philosophies and principles What is learning? - A review of Learning theories Requirements for reflection Reflection and reflective practices Part II Facilitating learning and reflective learning Academic practice and learning Methods of reflection for tutors Methods and assessment of reflective learning Becoming a facilitator: Enabling reflective learning Facilitation in practice: Basic skills Facilitation and further skills Part III Exemplars Action learning (learning sets
Journal ArticleDOI

Problem Structuring Methods in Action

TL;DR: A review and evaluation of the use of problem structuring methods (PSMs) in practice and some possible future developments are suggested, especially through productive interactions with similar or related practices.
Journal ArticleDOI

The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: A critical review

TL;DR: In the organizational learning literature, a variety of concepts exist denoting some third order of organizational learning, notably that of "triple-loop" learning as mentioned in this paper, but despite this there has been no systematic study of these concepts.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The case for methodological pluralism

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that all the aspects of complex systems can only be understood through multiple methodologies and that the agreement on a correct method within economics, however, seems to reflect stronger pressures within the discipline for conformity than for truth relative to ecology.
Journal ArticleDOI

In Defence of Paradigm Incommensurability

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a rigorous defence of paradigm incommensurability as con ceptualized by Burrell and Morgan, arguing that it is a necessary defence against scientistic authoritarianism.