scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.

Maxine S. Jochelson, +1 more
- 02 Mar 2021 - 
- Vol. 299, Iss: 1, pp 36-48
TLDR
Contrastenhanced mammography (CEM) has emerged as a viable alternative to contrast-enhanced breast MRI, and it may increase access to vascular imaging while reducing examination cost as discussed by the authors.
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has emerged as a viable alternative to contrast-enhanced breast MRI, and it may increase access to vascular imaging while reducing examination cost. Intravenous iodinated contrast materials are used in CEM to enhance the visualization of tumor neovascularity. After injection, imaging is performed with dual-energy digital mammography, which helps provide a low-energy image and a recombined or iodine image that depict enhancing lesions in the breast. CEM has been demonstrated to help improve accuracy compared with digital mammography and US in women with abnormal screening mammographic findings or symptoms of breast cancer. It has also been demonstrated to approach the accuracy of breast MRI in preoperative staging of patients with breast cancer and in monitoring response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are early encouraging results from trials evaluating CEM in the screening of women who are at an increased risk of breast cancer. Although CEM is a promising tool, it slightly increases radiation dose and carries a small risk of adverse reactions to contrast materials. This review details the CEM technique, diagnostic and screening uses, and future applications, including artificial intelligence and radiomics.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance

- 01 Mar 2022 - 
TL;DR: A systematic review and meta-analysis of CEM diagnostic performance considering different interpretation methods and clinical settings was performed by Bahl et al. as mentioned in this paper , who found that CEM demonstrated high performance in breast cancer detection, especially with joint interpretation of low-energy and recombined images.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

TL;DR: Comparison of CEM and CE-MRI regarding sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value in detecting breast cancer, involving all publicly available studies in the English language found Contrast-enhanced MRI had superior sensitivity and negative likelihood ratios with higher pretest probabilities to rule out malignancy compared with contrast-enhancing mammography.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for staging of breast cancer: The pro CEM perspective.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider the combination of contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) and US as a single appointment imaging strategy for preoperative staging of breast cancer, and conclude that there is only limited room for an additional benefit of breast MRI.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contrast-enhanced mammography: what the radiologist needs to know

TL;DR: This comprehensive review provides a practical overview of C EM technique, including CEM-guided biopsy; reading, interpretation and structured reporting of CEM images, including the accompanying learning curve, CEM artefacts and interpretation pitfalls; indications for CEM; disadvantages of Cem; and future developments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mammography-based Radiomics in Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review of Current Knowledge and Future Needs.

TL;DR: The potential role of mammography-based radiomics appears promising but more efforts are required to further evaluate its reliability as a routine clinical tool as discussed by the authors, and the role of integrating radiomics with other information is discussed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

TL;DR: The accuracy of screening mammography is best in older women and in women with fatty breasts, and the individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and HRT use on mammographic accuracy are examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.

TL;DR: The pathophysiologic basis of breast MR and the effects on acquisition technique and diagnostic accuracy, the diverging demands of high spatial and temporal resolution, and the different approaches that exist for image acquisition are reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.

TL;DR: Bilateral dual-energy contrast agent-enhanced digital mammography was feasible and easily accomplished and was used to detect known primary tumors at a rate comparable to that of MR imaging and higher than that of conventionaldigital mammography.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prevalence of Mammographically Dense Breasts in the United States

TL;DR: The prevalence of dense breasts among US women of common breast cancer screening ages exceeds 25 million and policymakers and healthcare providers should consider this large prevalence when debating breast density notification legislation and designing strategies to ensure that women who are notified have opportunities to evaluate breast cancer risk.