Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.
Maxine S. Jochelson,D. David Dershaw,Janice S. Sung,Alexandra S. Heerdt,Cynthia M Thornton,Chaya S. Moskowitz,Jessica Ferrara,Elizabeth A. Morris +7 more
TLDR
Bilateral dual-energy contrast agent-enhanced digital mammography was feasible and easily accomplished and was used to detect known primary tumors at a rate comparable to that of MR imaging and higher than that of conventionaldigital mammography.Abstract:
Bilateral dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography was feasible, easily accomplished, and depicted known primary tumors at a rate comparable to that of MR imaging and higher than that of conventional digital mammography.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size.
E. M. Fallenberg,Clarisse Dromain,Felix Diekmann,F. Engelken,M. Krohn,J. M. Singh,Barbara Ingold-Heppner,Klaus-Jürgen Winzer,Ulrich Bick,Diane M. Renz +9 more
TL;DR: Initial results show a better sensitivity of CESM and MRI in breast cancer detection than MG and a good correlation with postoperative histology in size assessment, compared with histopathology.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effects of Age on the Detection and Management of Breast Cancer
TL;DR: The effects of age as a factor in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment relating it to factors such as genetic status, breast cancer subtype, hormone factors and nodal status are examined and the observed correlations are examined.
Journal ArticleDOI
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI – clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation
Eva M. Fallenberg,Florian F. Schmitzberger,Heba Amer,Barbara Ingold-Heppner,Corinne Balleyguier,Felix Diekmann,F. Engelken,Ritse M. Mann,Diane M. Renz,Ulrich Bick,Bernd Hamm,Clarisse Dromain +11 more
TL;DR: CESM, alone and in combination with MG, is as accurate as MRI but is superior to MG for lesion detection and MRI and CESM and MRI are significantly superior toMG, particularly in dense breasts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme.
Marc B. I. Lobbes,Ulrich Lalji,Janneke B. Houwers,Estelle C. Nijssen,Patty J. Nelemans,Lori M. van Roozendaal,Marjolein L. Smidt,Esther M. Heuts,Joachim E. Wildberger +8 more
TL;DR: CESM increases diagnostic performance of conventional mammography, even in lower prevalence patient populations such as referrals from breast cancer screening, and is feasible in the workflow of referrals from routine breast screening.
Journal ArticleDOI
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI): Patient preferences and tolerance
TL;DR: The aim of this study is to compare patient experience of CESM against CEMRI during preoperative breast cancer staging and to determine which of these modalities is preferable.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Global cancer statistics
TL;DR: A substantial proportion of the worldwide burden of cancer could be prevented through the application of existing cancer control knowledge and by implementing programs for tobacco control, vaccination, and early detection and treatment, as well as public health campaigns promoting physical activity and a healthier dietary intake.
Book
The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
TL;DR: A comparison of Binary Tests and Regression Analysis and the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve shows that Binary Tests are more accurate than Ordinal Tests when the Receiver operating characteristic curve is considered.
Journal ArticleDOI
Efficacy of MRI and Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening in Women with a Familial or Genetic Predisposition
Mieke Kriege,Cecile T. M. Brekelmans,Carla Boetes,Peter E. Besnard,H. M. Zonderland,Inge Marie Obdeijn,Radu A. Manoliu,Theo Kok,Hans Peterse,Madeleine M.A. Tilanus-Linthorst,Sara H. Muller,Sybren L. Meijer,Jan C. Oosterwijk,Louk V.A.M. Beex,Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar,Harry J. de Koning,Emiel J. Th. Rutgers,Jan G. M. Klijn +17 more
TL;DR: MRI appears to be more sensitive than mammography in detecting tumors in women with an inherited susceptibility to breast cancer.
Journal Article
Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with familial or genetic predisposition
Mieke Kriege,C.T.M. Brekelmans,Carla Boetes,Steve Latosinsky,Geoffrey A. Porter,Todd M Tuttle +5 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared mammography to MRI in detecting breast cancer in women with a familial or genetic predisposition to breast cancer, and found that MRI appears to be more sensitive than mammography.
Journal ArticleDOI
Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.
Ellen Warner,Donald B. Plewes,Kimberley Hill,Petrina A. Causer,Judit Zubovits,Roberta A. Jong,Margaret R. Cutrara,Gerrit DeBoer,Martin J. Yaffe,Sandra J. Messner,Wendy S. Meschino,Cameron Piron,Steven A. Narod +12 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the sensitivity and specificity of four methods of breast cancer surveillance (mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and CBE) in women with hereditary susceptibility to breast cancer due to a BRCA1 or BRCa2 mutation.