scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Decentralized Finance: Regulating Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors propose formal registration obligations for cryptocurrency intermediaries, i.e., the exchange platforms that provide a marketplace for secondary market trading, to protect investors from fraud, theft, misconduct, and manipulation; enforcing accountability; preserving market integrity; and addressing enterprise and systemic risk management concerns.
Abstract
Global financial markets are in the midst of a transformative movement. The creation of Bitcoin and Facebook’s proposed distribution of Diem mark a watershed moment in the evolution of the financial markets ecosystem. Purportedly, peer-to-peer distributed digital ledger technology eliminates legacy financial market intermediaries such as investment banks, depository banks, exchanges, clearinghouses, and broker-dealers. Yet careful examination reveals that cryptocurrency issuers and the firms that offer secondary market cryptocurrency trading services have not quite lived up to their promise. Notwithstanding cryptoenthusiasts’ calls for disintermediation, evidence reveals that platforms that facilitate cryptocurrency trading frequently employ the long-adopted intermediation practices of their traditional counterparts. In fact, when emerging technologies fail, cryptocoin and token trading platforms partner with and rely on traditional financial services firms. As a result, these platforms face many of the risk-management threats that have plagued conventional financial institutions as well as a host of underexplored threats. Automated or algorithmic trading strategies, accelerated high frequency trading tactics, and sophisticated Ocean’s Eleven-style cyberheists leave crypto investors vulnerable to predatory practices. Early responses to fraud, misconduct, and manipulation emphasize intervention when originators first distribute cryptocurrencies— the initial coin offerings. This Article rejects the dominant regulatory narrative that prioritizes oversight of primary market transactions. Instead, this Article proposes that regulators introduce formal registration obligations for cryptocurrency intermediaries —the exchange platforms that provide a marketplace for secondary market trading. This approach recognizes the dynamic nature of cryptocurrency secondary market actors seeking to achieve disintermediation yet balances the potential benefits of trading intermediaries with normative regulatory goals—protecting investors from fraud, theft, misconduct, and manipulation; enforcing accountability; preserving market integrity; and addressing enterprise and systemic risk management concerns

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Economic estimation of Bitcoin mining’s climate damages demonstrates closer resemblance to digital crude than digital gold

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors provide economic estimates of the energy-related climate damages of mining Bitcoin, the dominant proof-of-work cryptocurrency, and provide three sustainability criteria for signaling when the climate damages may be unsustainable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Research contributions and challenges in DLT-based cryptocurrency regulation: a systematic mapping study

TL;DR: In this article , the authors identify research that has been carried out about cryptocurrency regulation contributions and the current challenges that need to be addressed in future studies and report the findings using systematic mapping.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of the key challenges of non-fungible tokens

TL;DR: The non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace spiked in the recent past as discussed by the authors , where the trading of NFTs has heavily influenced the growth of the decentralized application (dApp) marketplace, as exponential returns (thousand folds from their original value) on its ever-expanding market are being observed, leading to worldwide attention.
Posted Content

Securities Underwriters in Public Capital Markets: The Existence, Parameters and Consequences of the Fiduciary Obligation to Avoid Conflicts

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider whether an investment bank, when acting as underwriter of a public securities offering, owes the issuing company the fiduciary obligation to avoid conflicts of interest.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

License to Deal: Mandatory Approval of Complex Financial Products

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the first comprehensive analysis of one particular method of ex ante regulation, namely mandatory pre-market product approval, and its potential applicability to complex financial instruments, including derivatives, asset-backed securities, and other structured products.
Journal ArticleDOI

Macroprudential Regulation: A Sustainable Approach to Regulating Financial Markets

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the culture of financial institutions may lead board to govern these businesses less effectively than boards in non-financial sectors, and they challenge assumptions that conventional regulatory or corporate governance mechanisms will conclusively address systemic risk concerns in the financial sector.
Posted Content

Securities Underwriters in Public Capital Markets: The Existence, Parameters and Consequences of the Fiduciary Obligation to Avoid Conflicts

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider whether an investment bank, when acting as underwriter of a public securities offering, owes the issuing company the fiduciary obligation to avoid conflicts of interest.
Journal ArticleDOI

Securities Underwriters in Public Capital Markets: The Existence, Parameters and Consequences of the Fiduciary Obligation to Avoid Conflicts

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider whether an investment bank, when acting as underwriter of a public securities offering, owes the issuing company the fiduciary obligation to avoid conflicts of interest.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
Issuing coins to crypto exchanges versus decentralized exchange

The paper discusses the need for regulation of cryptocurrency exchanges, including both centralized exchanges that issue coins and decentralized exchanges.