scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Deleting edges to restrict the size of an epidemic in temporal networks

TLDR
This paper introduces two natural deletion problems for temporal graphs (for deletion of edges and of edge availabilities, respectively) and provides positive and negative results on their computational complexity, both in the traditional and the parameterized sense, subject to various natural parameters.
About
This article is published in Journal of Computer and System Sciences.The article was published on 2021-08-01 and is currently open access. It has received 18 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Path (graph theory) & Vertex (geometry).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Influence blocking maximization on networks: Models, methods and applications

TL;DR: In this article , a comprehensive survey and analysis of the theory and applications of influence blocking maximization is provided, which not only advances the theoretical understanding of the influence maximization problem, but will be a point of reference for future researches.
Book ChapterDOI

On Finding Separators in Temporal Split and Permutation Graphs

TL;DR: The (s, z)-separation problem is well-known to be polynomial solvable and serves as an important primitive in many applications related to network connectivity.
Posted Content

On Finding Separators in Temporal Split and Permutation Graphs

TL;DR: In this article, the authors study the problem of removing all connections between two vertices s and z in a graph by removing a minimum number of vertices is a fundamental problem in algorithmic graph theory.
Posted Content

The Complexity of Growing a Graph.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider the problem of constructing a growing graph in polynomial time and show that the optimal number of time slots to construct a given target graph with zero-waste (i.e., no edge deletions allowed), is hard even to approximate within Ω(n−1-\varepsilon) unless P=NP.
Book ChapterDOI

The Complexity of Growing a Graph

TL;DR: In this paper , the problem of finding the minimum number of slots required to grow a graph with zero excess edges is shown to be NP-complete and cannot be approximated within a factor of 2.
References
More filters

Combinatorial optimization. Polyhedra and efficiency.

TL;DR: This book shows the combinatorial optimization polyhedra and efficiency as your friend in spending the time in reading a book.
Journal ArticleDOI

Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters

TL;DR: In this paper, a new graph generator based on a forest fire spreading process was proposed, which has a simple, intuitive justification, requires very few parameters (like the flammability of nodes), and produces graphs exhibiting the full range of properties observed both in prior work and in the present study.
Book

Parameterized complexity theory

Jörg Flum, +1 more
TL;DR: Fixed-Parameter Tractability.
Book

Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks

TL;DR: A new and recent account presents a comprehensive explanation of the effect of complex connectivity patterns on dynamical phenomena in a vast number of everyday systems that can be represented as large complex networks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Complexity of finding embeddings in a k -tree

TL;DR: This work determines the complexity status of two problems related to finding the smallest number k such that a given graph is a partial k-tree and presents an algorithm with polynomially bounded (but exponential in k) worst case time complexity.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (11)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Deleting edges to restrict the size of an epidemic in temporal networks" ?

Here, the authors consider temporal graphs in which edges are available at specified timesteps, and study the problem of deleting edges from a given temporal graph in order to reduce the number of vertices ( temporally ) reachable from a given starting point. The authors introduce a natural deletion problem for temporal graphs and they provide positive and negative results on its computational complexity, both in the traditional and the parameterised sense ( subject to various natural parameters ), as well as addressing the approximability of this problem. 

There are three special vertices in an xi-gadget: xi and xi, which the authors call literal vertices, and vxi which the authors call the head vertex of the xi-gadget. 

the total number of iterations of the while loop is bounded by the number of edges in G, so the authors see that the algorithm will terminate in polynomial time. 

An edge between two vertices u and v of G is denoted by uv, and in this case u and v are said to be adjacent in G. Given a temporal graph (G,λ), where G = (V,E), the maximum label assigned by λ to an edge of G, called the lifetime of (G,λ), is denoted by T (G,λ), or simply by T when no confusion arises. 

The cutwidth of a graph G = (V,E) is the minimum integer c such that the vertices of G can be arranged in a linear order v1, . . . , vn, called a layout, such that for every i with 1 ≤ i < n the number of edges with one endpoint in v1, ..., vi and one in vi+1, ..., vn is at most c. Given a layout v1, v2, . . . , vn, the authors say that edges with one endpoint in v1, ..., vi and one in vi+1, ..., vn span vi, vi+1, and say that the maximum number of edges spanning a pair of consecutive vertices is the cutwidth of the layout. 

If (G,λ) is a temporal graph and v ∈ V (G), the authors say that T is a reachable subtree for v if T is a subtree of G, v ∈ V (T ) and, for all u ∈ V (T )\\{v}, there is a temporal path from v to u in (T, λ′), where λ′ is the restriction of λ to the edges of T . 

The authors claim that the following algorithm returns a c-approximation to Min TR Edge Deletion in polynomial time:1. Initialise E′ := ∅. 2. Initialise i := 0. 3. While (G,λ) has reachability greater than h:a. 

Every clause vertex can reach only the corresponding literal vertices, their neighbours incident to the literal edges, and its own satellite vertex. 

At every iteration, the algorithm removes exactly h edges, while the optimum deletion set Eopt must remove at least one of these h edges. 

Add all edges that span vj , vj+1 to E′, and and update (G,λ)← (G,λ) \\ E′. c. Update i← j + 1 4. Return E′. JFor any fixed cutwidth c, using the layout generation algorithm given by Thilikos et al. [45] and the algorithm described above, the authors can give a cutwidth-approximation to Min TR Edge Deletion for graphs with cutwidth c.I Corollary 11. 

It is worth noting here that the (similarly-flavored) deletion problem for finding small separators in temporal graphs was studied recently, namely the problem of removing a small number of vertices from a given temporal graph such that two fixed vertices become temporally disconnected [26,51].3