scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’

Vivien A. Schmidt
- 01 Mar 2013 - 
- Vol. 61, Iss: 1, pp 2-22
TLDR
In this article, the authors argue that the EU's legitimacy is mainly defined by output effectiveness for the people and input participation by the people, and they define and discuss this third normative criterion as well as the interaction effects of all three normative criteria.
Abstract
Scholars of the European Union have analyzed the EU's legitimacy mainly in terms of two normative criteria: output effectiveness for the people and input participation by the people. This article argues that missing from this theorization is what goes on in the ‘black box’ of governance between input and output, or ‘throughput’. Throughput consists of governance processes with the people, analyzed in terms of their efficacy, accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness to interest consultation. This article defines and discusses this third normative criterion as well as the interaction effects of all three normative criteria. It does so by considering EU scholars' institutional and constructivist analyses of EU legitimacy as well as empirical cases of and proposed solutions to the EU's democracy problems. The article also suggests that unlike input and output, which affect public perceptions of legitimacy both when they are increased or decreased, throughput tends to be most salient when negat...

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report








KFG 
KFG Working Paper Series
Edited by the Kolleg-Forschergruppe
            Kolleg-Forschergruppe   







Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) “










Germany











             
   






r

         





KFG 
Contents
 

 
3.1 Instuonal Regulatory Output 
3.2 Construcve Discursive Output 
 
4.1 Instuonal Representave Input 
4.2 Construcve Deliberave Input 
 
5.1 Instuonal Pluralist Throughput 
5.2 Instuonal Rules-Based Throughput 
5.3 Construcve Deliberave Throughput 

 
 


 
1







demos

              
output 
for  input
byof
throughput 

with 






forby and ofwith 
            




             


    


 
jour xe




Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Organizing for Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy

TL;DR: In this article, an organization theory-based approach is used to study the performance of a well-functioning governmental crisis management system, and how this can be studied using an organization theoretic approach.
Journal ArticleDOI

Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond

TL;DR: The Marrakesh Partnership for Global Climate Action (GCA) initiative was launched on the second day of the 22nd Conference of the Parties (COP21) as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: introduction and framework

TL;DR: In this paper, legitimacy is defined as the belief that an authority is appropriately exercised, and legitimacy and delegitimation as processes of justification and contestation intended to shape such beliefs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government:

TL;DR: For instance, this article found that people with more education and higher levels of skills trust government more than those educational and occupational groups that have benefited less from European integration, while the unemployed lost faith in government to a greater degree than other parts of the population.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors sketch an alternative strategy based on the question: What kinds of problems do a political system need to solve to count as "democratic" and suggest three general kinds: it should empower inclusions, form collective agendas and wills, and have capacities to make collective decisions.
References
More filters
Posted Content

Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that by thinking beyond traditional conceptions of the EU's international role and examining the case study of its international pursuit of the abolition of the death penalty, we may best conceive of the European Union as a "normative power Europe".
Journal ArticleDOI

Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse

TL;DR: The discursive institutionalism of as discussed by the authors is a more dynamic approach to institutional change than the older three new institutionalisms, which can be categorized into two types, cognitive and normative, and it comes in two forms: coordinative discourse among policy actors and communicative discourse between political actors and the public.
Book

Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research

TL;DR: In the face of complexity, policy research in the Face of Complexity as mentioned in this paper has been studied in the context of actor-centered institutionalism and actor-constellations.
Frequently Asked Questions (10)
Q1. What is the way out of the trilemma?

The only way out of this aspect of the trilemma toward a more virtuous circle is not just more and better output discourse and narratives as well as greater representative input to lengthen the“shadow of politics” but also remedies involving throughput, to change the institutional rules that putregulatory output beyond the reach of representative and deliberative input or pluralist and deliberative throughput. 

The continued use of the unanimity rule for treaties, in which the ability of any member-state to veto any agreement can lead to treaty delays, dilution or deadlock, means that even incremental change in an everenlarging Union may be stymied in the future – to the detriment not only of throughput legitimacy but also output, since new policies will not be agreed, and input, since a couple of veto-imposing member states can frustrate the desires of the large majority (Schmidt 2009a: 26-8). 

But national governments would need also to improve the national level inputs by bringing civil society into national formulation processes focused on EU decision-making. 

Increasing pluralist throughput could therefore improve output acceptance at the same time that reforming the unanimity and uniformity rules might help with input as well, by enabling the majority demands to work their way through the process. 

Politicians are reluctant to expend their scarce political resources on the EU, given political incentive structures and institutional rewards that push national politicians to tout their national level successes and to turn popular EU policies into national ones, since national politicians are elected by national electorates. 

This is important not only for the EU to continue to be a democratizing and socializing force in its neighborhood but also to ensure that the policy decisions are thereby the most legitimate (in input terms) and most effective (in output terms) – not only for countries on the periphery but also for countries like Norway and Switzerland, which have a major national democratic deficit as a result of the lack of institutional engagement. 

Beyond this, greater parliamentarization is imperative, for example, by facilitating greater EP input at the beginning stages of policy formulation, by more fully connecting the EP to national parliaments – now facilitated by the Lisbon Treaty – and by ensuring greater citizen access to the EP. 

The second is the normative discourse about the EU as a bordered values-based community, most identified with France and Germany, which is also most likely to build the thickest of identities, since it most closely approximates the kind found in nation-states based on common values, solidarity and clear borders. 

The failures of constructive input legitimacy, thus, result from the primacy of national political ideas and discourse and the paucity of ideas and discourse about the EU. 

There are also problems with regard to the EP’s role, since it has little influence over initiation, no connection to comitology and so far also little connection to national parliaments – although this could change for the better, given that a procedure for consultation was written into the Lisbon Treaty. 

Trending Questions (1)
What is the difference between input and output democracy?

Input democracy refers to the participation of the people in decision-making processes, while output democracy refers to the effectiveness of policies and outcomes for the people.