scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Derivation & validation of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA 1c ) cut-off value as a diagnostic test for type 2 diabetes in south Indian population.

TLDR
HbA1c >6.3 per cent appears to be the optimal cut-off value for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes applicable to the ethnic population of Rayalaseema area of Andhra Pradesh state in south India.
Abstract
Background & Objectives: Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA 1c ) has been in use for more than a decade, as a diagnostic test for type 2 diabetes. Validity of HbA 1c needs to be established in the ethnic population in which it is intended to be used. The objective of this study was to derive and validate a HbA 1c cut-off value for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in the ethnic population of Rayalaseema area of south India. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, consecutive patients suspected to have type 2 diabetes underwent fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2 h post-load plasma glucose (2 h-PG) measurements after a 75 g glucose load and HbA 1c estimation. They were classified as having diabetes as per the American Diabetes Association criteria [(FPG ≥7 mmol/l (≥126 mg/dl) and/or 2 h-PG ≥11.1 mmol/l (≥200 mg/dl)]. In the training data set (n = 342), optimum cut-off value of HbA 1c for defining type 2 diabetes was derived by receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve method using oral glucose tolerance test results as gold standard. This cut-off was validated in a validation data set (n = 341). Results: On applying HbA 1c cut-off value of >6.3 per cent (45 mmol/mol) to the training data set,sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosing type 2 diabetes were calculated to be 90.6, 85.2, 80.8 and 93.0 per cent, respectively. When the same cut-off value was applied to the validation data set, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 88.8 , 81.9, 74.0 and 92.7 per cent, respectively, although the latter were consistently smaller than the proportions for the training data set, the differences being not significant. Interpretation & conclusions: HbA 1c >6.3 per cent (45 mmol/mol) appears to be the optimal cut-off value for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes applicable to the ethnic population of Rayalaseema area of Andhra Pradesh state in south India.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of Hemoglobin A1c with Fasting and 2-h Plasma Glucose Tests for Diagnosis of Diabetes and Prediabetes among High-risk South Indians.

TL;DR: HbA1c ≥6.5% is a convenient and reliable alternative to plasma glucose tests to diagnose diabetes among high-risk South Indians and 0.6% had 100% negative predictive value to exclude prediabetes/diabetes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Choice of criterion used in the receiver operating characteristic analysis.

TL;DR: It is believed that in selecting the criterion used to derive the most appropriate test cut-off value in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the author should also consider other important contributing factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intermediate hyperglycaemia and 10-year mortality in resource-constrained settings: the PERU MIGRANT Study.

TL;DR: To determine whether intermediate hyperglycaemia, defined by fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c criteria, is associated with mortality in a 10‐year cohort of people in a Latin American country, a cohort study is conducted.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Utility of Glycated Hemoglobin in Diagnosing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Community-Based Study

TL;DR: A HbA1c cut point of 6.1% has an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 81% and can be used as a screening test, and a cut pointof 6.5% has optimal specificity of 88% for diagnosis of diabetes.
Journal ArticleDOI

A1C Cut Points to Define Various Glucose Intolerance Groups in Asian Indians

TL;DR: In Asian Indians, A1C cut points of 6.1 and 6.4% defined diabetes by 2-h postload plasma glucose or FPG criteria, respectively, while a value of 5.6% optimally identified IGT or IFG but was <70% accurate.
Journal ArticleDOI

A1C: does one size fit all?

Robert M. Cohen
- 01 Oct 2007 - 
TL;DR: A “high glycator–low glycator” hypothesis is proposed to explain how apparently equivalent glycemic control could result in differing A1C values, based on the observation that while most individuals in a population with a given mean blood glucose will have A 1C within a fairly narrow expected range, there are subsets who have a consistently higher or consistently lower value.
Journal ArticleDOI

HbA1c of 6.5% to diagnose diabetes mellitus -- does it work for us? -- the Bellville South Africa study

TL;DR: A cut off of 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) is a good diagnostic tool with its high specificity; however the low sensitivity limits its use, which emphasizes the need for evidenced based values to be established in various population groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

HbA1c values for defining diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Asian Indians

TL;DR: In this study population from north and south regions of India, the HbA(1c) cut-point that defines NDD was much lower than that proposed by an international expert committee and the American Diabetes Association (≥6.8%) and was slightly lower than the ≥5.7% for high risk proposed, but accuracy was less than 70%.
Related Papers (5)