scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing

TLDR
In this article, the authors derived an expression for the general difference-in-differences estimator and showed that it is a weighted average of all possible two-group/two-period estimators in the data.
Abstract
The canonical difference-in-differences (DD) model contains two time periods, “pre” and “post”, and two groups, “treatment” and “control”. Most DD applications, however, exploit variation across groups of units that receive treatment at different times. This paper derives an expression for this general DD estimator, and shows that it is a weighted average of all possible two-group/two-period DD estimators in the data. This result provides detailed guidance about how to use regression DD in practice. I define the DD estimand and show how it averages treatment effect heterogeneity and that it is biased when effects change over time. I propose a new balance test derived from a unified definition of common trends. I show how to decompose the difference between two specifications, and I apply it to models that drop untreated units, weight, disaggregate time fixed effects, control for unit-specific time trends, or exploit a third difference.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

National and Global Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops

TL;DR: In this article , the authors estimate the impact of genetically modified (GM) crops on countrywide yields, harvested area, and trade using a triple-differences rollout design that exploits variation in the availability of GM seeds across crops, countries, and time.
Journal ArticleDOI

The adverse effects of the visa exemption policy: evidence of immigration violations in Indonesia

TL;DR: The government of Indonesia recently introduced an extensive visa exemption policy to 169 countries as discussed by the authors, which may impose extra costs on the economy and may not be beneficial to the tourists in the long run.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unmet Need: Evaluating Pell as a Lever for Equitable Dual Enrollment Participation and Outcomes

TL;DR: This paper used a difference-in-differences design to evaluate a unique federal pilot program that allowed high school students to access Pell Grants to fund their dual enrollment and found a negative effect of the pilot program on dual enrollment participation, with no effect on subsequent college attendance.
Related Papers (5)