scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Effects of a family intervention on the quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family caregivers

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Patients with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers, who participated in a family based intervention, report better quality of life and other psychosocial outcomes than dyads who received standard care alone.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers, who participated in a family based intervention, report better quality of life and other psychosocial outcomes than dyads who received standard care alone. Methods: Using a randomized clinical trial, 134 patients and their family caregivers were assigned to usual care (control) or to usual care plus the family intervention (experimental condition). Dyads were assessed at baseline, three- and six-months later. The intervention consisted of five sessions and addressed family involvement, optimistic attitude, coping effectiveness, uncertainty reduction, and symptom management. Results: Patients in the family intervention reported significantly less hopelessness and less negative appraisal of illness than controls; their family caregivers reported significantly less negative appraisal of caregiving. Intervention effects were evident at three-months, but were not sustained at six-months. No difference was found in the quality of life of dyads in experimental or control conditions. Conclusions: Although the family intervention had positive effects initially, these effects were not sustained over time. Future studies need to consider program dose and duration of effect, outcome measures that are more sensitive to change, and realistic end-points for patients with advanced cancer. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness†‡

TL;DR: The Chronic Care Model is presented as a model of care that oncology practices can use to enable and empower patients and families to engage in self‐management in order to build strong relationships with their patients and formulate mutually agreed upon care plans.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interventions with Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials†‡§

TL;DR: Meta‐analysis indicated that although these interventions had small to medium effects, they significantly reduced caregiver burden, improved caregivers' ability to cope, increased their self‐efficacy, and improved aspects of their quality of life.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality of life of family caregivers of cancer survivors: across the trajectory of the illness.

TL;DR: The authors reviewed literature on the QOL of family caregivers at the acute and middle‐ to long‐term survivorship phases as well as the bereavement phase to assess the impact on various aspects of the family caregivers' QOL.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychosocial Concerns and Interventions for Cancer Survivors

TL;DR: The goals of this article are to document the need for attention to psychosocial domains, and highlight recent examples of randomized, controlled psychossocial intervention trials directed toward cancer survivors after the completion of primary medical treatments.
References
More filters
Book

Stress, appraisal, and coping

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a detailed theory of psychological stress, building on the concepts of cognitive appraisal and coping, which have become major themes of theory and investigation in psychology.
Journal ArticleDOI

You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE.

TL;DR: A brief form of a previously published measure of coping assessing several responses known to be relevant to effective and ineffective coping called the COPE inventory is presented, which has proven to be useful in health-related research.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure.

TL;DR: The FACT-G meets or exceeds all requirements for use in oncology clinical trials, including ease of administration, brevity, reliability, validity, and responsiveness to clinical change.
Journal ArticleDOI

The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale.

TL;DR: A scale designed to quantify hopelessness was administered to several diverse samples of patients to assess its psychometric properties and was found to have a high degree of internal consistency and showed a relatively high correlation with the clinical ratings of hopelessness and other self-administered measures of despair.
Related Papers (5)