scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias.

Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben, +1 more
- 01 Jun 2013 - 
- Vol. 48, Iss: 3, pp 913-930
TLDR
It is important that the quality of survey data be considered to assess the relative contribution to the literature of a given study and the potential effects of nonresponse bias should be considered both before and after survey administration.
Abstract
Objective: To address the issue of nonresponse as problematic and offer appropriate strategies for assessing nonresponse bias. Study Design: A review of current strategies used to assess the quality of survey data and the challenges associated with these strategies is provided along with appropriate post-data collection techniques that researchers should consider. Principal Findings: Response rates are an incomplete assessment of survey data quality and quick reactions to response rate should be avoided. Based on a five-question decision making framework we offer potential ways to assess nonresponse bias along with a description of the advantages and disadvantages to each. Conclusions: It is important that the quality of survey data be considered to assess the relative contribution to the literature of a given study. Authors and funding agencies should consider the potential effects of nonresponse bias both before and after survey administration and report the results of assessments of nonresponse bias in addition to response rates.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality and Impact of Survey Research Among Anesthesiologists: A Systematic Review.

TL;DR: The impact of published research based on surveys of anesthesiologists, as measured by citation scores and Altmetrics, may be driven primarily by the novel data or questions raised using survey methodology, but does not appear to be associated with response rates.
Dissertation

Using pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system data to investigate prescription drug use during pregnancy in Hawai`i

TL;DR: It is suggested that within the context of a large-scale experiment using a simple, scalable, and scalable method, the results should be considered to be satisfactory.

Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in Europe

K. Brück
TL;DR: A surprisingly large variation in CKD prevalence across European countries despite using age and sex standardization is observed, and it is hypothesized that the variation can be contributed to both true variation and to methodological differences.
Journal ArticleDOI

A cross-sectional observational study of health-related quality of life in adults with multiple myeloma

TL;DR: Better socioeconomic status, higher comorbidities, not being in remission, and past receipt of radiation therapy were significantly associated with worse HRQoL, while treatment status and time since diagnosis were not associated with HRZoL outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Barriers and reliability of patient experience evaluation in Ontario: perspectives of healthcare providers, managers, and policymakers

TL;DR: This paper reveals that many healthcare providers, managers and policymakers do not see a tangible value in PE evaluation, regardless of Ontario's patient-centeredness and “patient first” rhetoric, and improvement in evaluation methods and a cultural change in the healthcare system regarding the value of PE are required.
References
More filters
Posted Content

Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys

TL;DR: Valid predictions for the direction of nonresponse bias were obtained from subjective estimates and extrapolations in an analysis of mail survey data from published studies and the use of extrapolation led to substantial improvements over a strategy of not using extrapolation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys

TL;DR: The authors showed that nonresponse bias can be translated into causal models to guide hypotheses about when nonresponse causes bias, but the linkage between nonresponse rates and nonresponse biases is absent.
Journal ArticleDOI

Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.

TL;DR: Although several mail survey techniques are associated with higher response rates, response rates to published mail surveys tend to be moderate, and investigators, journal editors, and readers should devote more attention to assessments of bias, and less to specific response rate thresholds.
Related Papers (5)