scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Excitation and decay of solar-wind driven flows in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system

Stanley W. H. Cowley, +1 more
- 01 Feb 1992 - 
- Vol. 10, pp 103-115
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors considered the high-latitude ionospheric flows and their excitation and decay and proposed a flow-free equilibrium configuration for a magnetosphere which contains a given (arbitrary) amount of open flux.
Abstract
Basic concepts of the form of high-latitude ionospheric flows and their excitation and decay are discussed in the light of recent high time-resolution measurements made by ground-based radars. It is first pointed out that it is in principle impossible to adequately parameterize these flows by any single quantity derived from concurrent interplanetary conditions. Rather, even at its simplest, the flow must be considered to consist of two basic time-dependent components. The first is the flow driven by magnetopause coupling processes alone, principally by dayside reconnection. These flows may indeed be reasonably parameterized in terms of concurrent near-Earth interplanetary conditions, principally by the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) vector. The second is the flow driven by tail reconnection alone. As a first approximation these flows may also be parameterized in terms of interplanetary conditions, principally the north-south component of the IMF, but with a delay in the flow response of around 30-60 min relative to the IMF. A delay in the tail response of this order must be present due to the finite speed of information propagation in the system, and we show how "growth" and "decay" of the field and flow configuration then follow as natural consequences. To discuss the excitation and decay of the two reconnection-driven components of the flow we introduce that concept of a flow-free equilibrium configuration for a magnetosphere which contains a given (arbitrary) amount of open flux. Reconnection events act either to create or destroy open flux, thus causing departures of the system from the equilibrium configuration. Flow is then excited which moves the system back towards equilibrium with the changed amount of open flux. We estimate that the overall time scale associated with the excitation and decay of the flow is about 15 min. The response of the system to both impulsive (flux transfer event) and continuous reconnection is discussed in these terms.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Response of the Polar Cap Ionosphere to Changes in (Solar Wind) IMF

TL;DR: The character of the polar ionosphere is dominated by the component of the solar wind IMF (Interplanetary Magnetic Field) that is parallel/anti-parallel to earth's magnetic field.
Book ChapterDOI

Coupling the Solar-Wind/IMF to the Ionosphere Through the high Latitude Cusps

TL;DR: In this article, all-sky photometer observations of 557.7 nm emissions in the cusp region provide a "television picture" of the merging process and may be used to infer the temporal and spatial variability of magnetic merging, tied to variations in the IMF.
Journal ArticleDOI

A MHD mechanism for the generation of the meridional current system during substorm expansion phase

TL;DR: In this article, the upward field-aligned current (FAC) intensifies as the dawn-dusk plasma pressure gradient enhances in the Harang region during the substorm expansion phase (EP).
Journal ArticleDOI

Tailward Propagation of Magnetic Energy Density Variations With Respect to Substorm Onset Times

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the variation in the magnetotail magnetic energy density with respect to substorm onset for 541 isolated onsets and deduced that energy in the near-tail region is released first during the substorm expansion phase, with energy conversion propagating away from the Earth with time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comment on “By fluctuations in the magnetosheath and azimuthal flow velocity transients in the dayside ionosphere” by Newell and Sibeck

TL;DR: Newell and Sibeck as mentioned in this paper presented an alternative explanation in terms of steady reconnection and fluctuations in the magnitude of the By component of the magnetosheath field, which was only overlooked in so far as it fails to explain the observations.
Related Papers (5)