Open AccessJournal Article
Excitation and decay of solar-wind driven flows in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors considered the high-latitude ionospheric flows and their excitation and decay and proposed a flow-free equilibrium configuration for a magnetosphere which contains a given (arbitrary) amount of open flux.Abstract:
Basic concepts of the form of high-latitude ionospheric flows and their excitation and decay are discussed in the light of recent high time-resolution measurements made by ground-based radars. It is first pointed out that it is in principle impossible to adequately parameterize these flows by any single quantity derived from concurrent interplanetary conditions. Rather, even at its simplest, the flow must be considered to consist of two basic time-dependent components. The first is the flow driven by magnetopause coupling processes alone, principally by dayside reconnection. These flows may indeed be reasonably parameterized in terms of concurrent near-Earth interplanetary conditions, principally by the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) vector. The second is the flow driven by tail reconnection alone. As a first approximation these flows may also be parameterized in terms of interplanetary conditions, principally the north-south component of the IMF, but with a delay in the flow response of around 30-60 min relative to the IMF. A delay in the tail response of this order must be present due to the finite speed of information propagation in the system, and we show how "growth" and "decay" of the field and flow configuration then follow as natural consequences. To discuss the excitation and decay of the two reconnection-driven components of the flow we introduce that concept of a flow-free equilibrium configuration for a magnetosphere which contains a given (arbitrary) amount of open flux. Reconnection events act either to create or destroy open flux, thus causing departures of the system from the equilibrium configuration. Flow is then excited which moves the system back towards equilibrium with the changed amount of open flux. We estimate that the overall time scale associated with the excitation and decay of the flow is about 15 min. The response of the system to both impulsive (flux transfer event) and continuous reconnection is discussed in these terms.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
An Explicit IMF B Dependence on Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling
Journal ArticleDOI
Timescales of Birkeland currents driven by the IMF
John C. Coxon,Robert Shore,Mervyn P. Freeman,Robert Fear,S. D. Browett,A. W. Smith,Daniel Whiter,Brian J. Anderson +7 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors obtain current densities from the Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment (AMPERE), alongside By and Bz from the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) for March 2010.
Journal ArticleDOI
The coherence between the IMF and high-latitude ionospheric flows: The dayside magnetosphere–ionosphere low-pass filter
D.L. Murr,W. J. Hughes +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a low-pass filter function through which interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) fluctuations are processed as they are communicated from the magnetopause to the high-latitude ionosphere near local noon was established.
Journal ArticleDOI
Pulsed flows observed during an interval of prolonged northward IMF
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors observed the ionospheric signatures of flux transfer events (FTEs) in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, occurring with a periodicity of ~15min.
Journal ArticleDOI
Testing nowcasts of the ionospheric convection from the expanding and contracting polar cap model
TL;DR: The expanding/contracting polar cap (ECPC) model, or the time-dependent Dungey cycle, provides a theoretical framework for understanding solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling.
Related Papers (5)
DARN/SUPERDARN : A global view of the dynamics of high-latitude convection
Large-scale imaging of high-latitude convection with Super Dual Auroral Radar Network HF radar observations
J. M. Ruohoniemi,K. B. Baker +1 more