scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessProceedings ArticleDOI

Fan Noise Source Diagnostic Test - Rotor Alone Aerodynamic Performance Results

TLDR
The aerodynamic performance of an isolated fan or rotor alone model was measured in the NASA Glenn Research Center 9- by 15-foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel as part of the Fan Broadband Source Diagnostic Test conducted at NASA Glenn as discussed by the authors.
Abstract
The aerodynamic performance of an isolated fan or rotor alone model was measured in the NASA Glenn Research Center 9- by 15- Foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel as part of the Fan Broadband Source Diagnostic Test conducted at NASA Glenn. The Source Diagnostic Test was conducted to identify the noise sources within a wind tunnel scale model of a turbofan engine and quantify their contribution to the overall system noise level. The fan was part of a 1/5th scale model representation of the bypass stage of a current technology turbofan engine. For the rotor alone testing, the fan and nacelle, including the inlet, external cowl, and fixed area fan exit nozzle, were modeled in the test hardware; the internal outlet guide vanes located behind the fan were removed. Without the outlet guide vanes, the velocity at the nozzle exit changes significantly, thereby affecting the fan performance. As part of the investigation, variations in the fan nozzle area were tested in order to match as closely as possible the rotor alone performance with the fan performance obtained with the outlet guide vanes installed. The fan operating performance was determined using fixed pressure/temperature combination rakes and the corrected weight flow. The performance results indicate that a suitable nozzle exit was achieved to be able to closely match the rotor alone and fan/outlet guide vane configuration performance on the sea level operating line. A small shift in the slope of the sea level operating line was measured, which resulted in a slightly higher rotor alone fan pressure ratio at take-off conditions, matched fan performance at cutback conditions, and a slightly lower rotor alone fan pressure ratio at approach conditions. However, the small differences in fan performance at all fan conditions were considered too small to affect the fan acoustic performance.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Christopher E. Hughes, Robert J. Jeracki, Richard P. Woodward,
and Christopher J. Miller
Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Fan Noise Source Diagnostic Test—Rotor
Alone Aerodynamic Performance Results
NASA/TM—2005-211681
April 2005
AIAA–2002–2426

The NASA STI Program Office . . . in Profile
Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to
the advancement of aeronautics and space
science. The NASA Scientific and Technical
Information (STI) Program Office plays a key part
in helping NASA maintain this important role.
The NASA STI Program Office is operated by
Langley Research Center, the Lead Center for
NASA’s scientific and technical information. The
NASA STI Program Office provides access to the
NASA STI Database, the largest collection of
aeronautical and space science STI in the world.
The Program Office is also NASA’s institutional
mechanism for disseminating the results of its
research and development activities. These results
are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report
Series, which includes the following report types:
TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of
completed research or a major significant
phase of research that present the results of
NASA programs and include extensive data
or theoretical analysis. Includes compilations
of significant scientific and technical data and
information deemed to be of continuing
reference value. NASA’s counterpart of peer-
reviewed formal professional papers but
has less stringent limitations on manuscript
length and extent of graphic presentations.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientific
and technical findings that are preliminary or
of specialized interest, e.g., quick release
reports, working papers, and bibliographies
that contain minimal annotation. Does not
contain extensive analysis.
CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and
technical findings by NASA-sponsored
contractors and grantees.
CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected
papers from scientific and technical
conferences, symposia, seminars, or other
meetings sponsored or cosponsored by
NASA.
SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific,
technical, or historical information from
NASA programs, projects, and missions,
often concerned with subjects having
substantial public interest.
TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English-
language translations of foreign scientific
and technical material pertinent to NASA’s
mission.
Specialized services that complement the STI
Program Office’s diverse offerings include
creating custom thesauri, building customized
data bases, organizing and publishing research
results . . . even providing videos.
For more information about the NASA STI
Program Office, see the following:
Access the NASA STI Program Home Page
at http://www.sti.nasa.gov
E-mail your question via the Internet to
help@sti.nasa.gov
Fax your question to the NASA Access
Help Desk at 301–621–0134
Telephone the NASA Access Help Desk at
301–621–0390
Write to:
NASA Access Help Desk
NASA Center for AeroSpace Information
7121 Standard Drive
Hanover, MD 21076

Fan Noise Source Diagnostic Test—Rotor
Alone Aerodynamic Performance Results
NASA/TM—2005-211681
April 2005
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration
Glenn Research Center
Prepared for the
Eighth Aeroacoustics Conference
cosponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
and the Confederation of European Aerospace Societies
Breckenridge, Colorado, June 17–19, 2002
AIAA–2002–2426
Christopher E. Hughes, Robert J. Jeracki, Richard P. Woodward,
and Christopher J. Miller
Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Acknowledgments
Acknowledgment is given to General Electric Aircraft Engines for designing the R4 model fan and providing it to
NASA as the current technology high bypass fan baseline for this test. Also, GEAE designed and fabricated the
three model OGV configurations and model nacelle used in this test under NASA Contract NAS3–26617,
Task Order 63 and NAS3–98004, Task Order 7. Acknowledgment is also given to the Boeing Aircraft
Company for their earlier fan noise research with and without the presence of downstream
stators. Those Boeing results provided insight and focus for the current
NASA rotor alone noise research program.
Available from
NASA Center for Aerospace Information
7121 Standard Drive
Hanover, MD 21076
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22100
Available electronically at http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/GLTRS

NASA/TM—2005-211681
1
Fan Noise Source Diagnostic Test—Rotor Alone
Aerodynamic Performance Results
Christopher E. Hughes, Robert J. Jeracki,
Richard P. Woodward, and Christopher J. Miller
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Glenn Research Center
Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Abstract
The aerodynamic performance of an isolated
fan, or rotor alone, model was measured in the
NASA Glenn Research Center 9- by 15-Foot Low
Speed Wind Tunnel as part of the Fan
Broadband Source Diagnostic Test conducted at
NASA Glenn. The Source Diagnostic Test was
conducted to identify the noise sources within a
wind tunnel scale model of a turbofan engine and
quantify their contribution to the overall system
noise level. The fan was part of a 1/5th scale
model representation of the bypass stage of a
current technology turbofan engine. For the rotor
alone testing, the fan and nacelle, including the
inlet, external cowl and fixed area fan exit nozzle,
were modeled in the test hardware; the internal
outlet guide vanes located behind the fan were
removed. Without the outlet guide vanes, the
velocity at the nozzle exit changes significantly,
thereby affecting the fan performance. As part of
the investigation, variations in the fan nozzle area
were tested in order to match as closely as
possible the rotor alone performance with the fan
performance obtained with the outlet guide vanes
installed. The fan operating performance was
determined using fixed pressure/temperature
combination rakes and the corrected weight flow.
The performance results indicate that a suitable
nozzle exit was achieved to be able to closely
match the rotor alone and fan/outlet guide vane
configuration performance on the sea level
operating line. A small shift in the slope of the sea
level operating line was measured, which
resulted in a slightly higher rotor alone fan
pressure ratio at take-off conditions, matched fan
performance at cutback conditions, and a slightly
lower rotor alone fan pressure ratio at approach
conditions. However, the small differences in fan
performance at all fan conditions were
considered too small to affect the fan acoustic
performance.
Introduction
Recent aircraft engine noise research by NASA
and the aerospace industry
1-5
has focused on
identifying the composition of the noise sources in a
modern turbofan aircraft engine, their generation
mechanisms, and the level of contribution to the
total aircraft system noise level. A test was
conducted in the NASA Glenn Research Center 9-
by 15-Foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel (9x15 LSWT),
called the Source Diagnostic Test. The objectives
of the test were to investigate the aerodynamic and
acoustic performance of the bypass stage portion
of a scale model high bypass ratio turbofan engine
and three Outlet Guide Vane (OGV) configurations
that were designed to reduce turbofan noise. The
turbofan model design was representative of a
current technology high bypass turbofan engine in
service today. As part of this test, detailed acoustic
and aerodynamic flowfield surveys were conducted
using a variety of research techniques.
One of the
techniques used to determine the fan only
component of the system noise was eliminating the
rotor/stator interaction by removing the OGVs.
Since the OGVs are the structural supporting
component for the model nacelle, an externally
supported nacelle was used during testing.
However, without the OGVs, the swirl component of
the bypass nozzle exit flow was not removed,
resulting in a higher fan exit velocity and lower fan
exit pressure. Therefore, the fan nozzle exit area
needed to be modified to produce the same fan
operating conditions compared to a fan with OGVs
installed at the same fan speed. This paper
presents the process used in determining the
correct nozzle exit area for the rotor alone nacelle,
and compares the fan aerodynamic performance
obtained without OGVs, or rotor alone
performance, to the fan performance obtained with
OGVs installed.

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Large Eddy Simulation of a scale-model turbofan for fan noise source diagnostic

TL;DR: In this paper, a wall-modelled statistically converged Large Eddy Simulation (LES) of the turbulent flow in the NASA Source Diagnostic Test turbofan has been successfully performed for the first time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unsteady Simulations of a Fan/Outlet-Guide-Vane System: Aerodynamics and Turbulence

TL;DR: In this paper, the aerodynamic and turbulent aspects of a project devoted to creating and validating a high-fidelity computational-fluid-dynamics-based system for the prediction of the performance of the performa
Journal ArticleDOI

The acoustic analogy in an annular duct with swirling mean flow

TL;DR: In this paper, an acoustic analogy was developed to predict sound generation in a swirling and sheared base flow in an annular duct, including the presence of moving solid surfaces to account for blade rows.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unsteady Simulations of a Fan/Outlet-Guide-Vane System: Broadband-Noise Computation

TL;DR: The fan broadband noise of a rotor–stator system representing a turbofan aeroengine is investigated using the improved delayed detached-eddy-simulation approach.
Related Papers (5)