scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The authors examined the use of seven mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders, including shareholdings of insiders, institutions, and large blockholders, use of outside directors, debt policy, managerial labor market, and market for corporate control.
Abstract
This paper examines the use of seven mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. These mechanisms are: shareholdings of insiders, institutions, and large blockholders; use of outside directors; debt policy; the managerial labor market; and the market for corporate control. We present direct empirical evidence of interdependence among these mechanisms in a large sample of firms. This finding suggests that crosssectional OLS regressions of firm performance on single mechanisms may be misleading. Indeed, we find relationships between firm performance and four of the mechanisms when each is included in a separate OLS regression. These are insider shareholdings, outside directors, debt, and corporate control activity. Importantly, the effect of insider shareholdings disappears when all of the mechanisms are included in a single OLS regression, and the effects of debt and corporate control activity also disappear when estimations are made in a simultaneous systems framework. Together, these findings are consistent with optimal use of each control mechanism except outside directors.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Are Debt and Incentive Compensation Substitutes in Controlling the Free Cash Flow Agency Problem

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the governance implications of a firm s capital structure and managerial incentive compensation in controlling the free cash flow agency problem, and found that debt and executive stock options act as substitutes in attenuating a firm's free cashflow problem; failure to incorporate the substitutability and endogeneity leads to underestimates of the magnitude and economic implication of both mechanisms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Board Composition and Social & Environmental Accountability: A Dynamic Model Analysis of Chinese Firms

TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper investigated the impact of corporate governance mechanisms (board independence, board size, CEO duality, and board gender diversity) on Chinese firms' environmental performance, sustainability performance, and environmental information disclosures (EID).
Dissertation

A comparison of corporate governance and firm performance in developing (Malaysia) and developed (Australia) financial markets

Kashif Rashid
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the relationship between corporate governance and the value of a firm in developing and developed financial markets due to disparate corporate governance structures in these markets resulting from the dissimilar social, economic and regulatory conditions in these countries.
Journal ArticleDOI

Access, Common Agency, and Board Size

TL;DR: In this article, the authors study the impact of the size of a firm's board of directors on managerial incentives and find that the number of social objectives (community, diversity, environment, etc.) that a firm pursues is positively related to board size.
Journal ArticleDOI

Corporate boards and voluntary implementation of best disclosure practices in emerging markets: Evidence from the UAE listed companies in the Middle East

TL;DR: In this article, an empirical study was conducted to investigate the corporate board variables that are related to the practice of voluntary disclosure in listed companies in the Middle East, with a particular focus on the United Arab Emirates (UAE), given its unique corporate governance environment.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis

TL;DR: This article investigated the relationship between management ownership and market valuation of the firm, as measured by Tobin's Q. In a 1980 cross-section of 371 Fortune 500 firms, they found evidence of a significant nonmonotonic relationship.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the structure of corporate ownership varies systematically in ways that are consistent with value maximization, and they find no significant relationship between ownership concentration and accounting profit rates for a set of firms.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice

TL;DR: In this paper, the explanatory power of some of the recent theories of optimal capital structure is analyzed empirically and a factor-analytic technique is used to mitigate the measurement problems encountered when working with proxy variables.
Journal ArticleDOI

Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value

TL;DR: The authors investigated the relation between Tobin's Q and the structure of equity ownership for a sample of 1,173 firms for 1976 and 1,093 firms for 1986 and found a significant curvilinear relation between Q and common stock owned by corporate insiders.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the existence of an optimal capital structure: theory and evidence

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that if there are significant "leverage-related" costs, such as bankruptcy costs, agency costs of debt, and loss of non-debt tax shields, then the marginal bondholder's tax rate will be less than the corporate rate and there will be a positive net tax advantage to corporate debt financing.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
Do controlling shareholder firms engage in strategic decision-making?

Controlling shareholder firms engage in strategic decision-making through mechanisms like insider shareholdings, outside directors, debt policy, and corporate control activities, as per the paper's findings.